<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" ?>
<rss xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>comets-ml at Yahoo! Groups</title>
    <link>http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/comets-ml/</link>
    <description>Comets Mailing List</description>

    <item>
      <title>Comet precovery</title>
      <pubDate>Sat, 07 Nov 2009 20:55:04 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>Matson, Robert D.</dc:creator>
      <link>http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/comets-ml/message/16102</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/comets-ml/message/16102</guid>
      <description>Hi Seiichi, ... They were reported right away. Brian Marsden and I exchanged a number of e-mails on the linkage, and ultimately came to the conclusion that the</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>P/2009 U4 and 89P</title>
      <pubDate>Sat, 07 Nov 2009 18:57:54 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>Seiichi Yoshida</dc:creator>
      <link>http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/comets-ml/message/16101</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/comets-ml/message/16101</guid>
      <description>Dear colleagues, I heard that P/2009 U4 (McNaught) was discovered in the course of follow-up observations of C/2009 R1. P/2009 U4 had been bright before</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>comets rendezvous in November</title>
      <pubDate>Sat, 07 Nov 2009 18:56:41 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>Seiichi Yoshida</dc:creator>
      <link>http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/comets-ml/message/16100</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/comets-ml/message/16100</guid>
      <description>Dear colleagues, * Two cometary-asteroids (or asteroidal comets) will be close in mid November. 2009 Nov. 15  19h UT  0.268 deg ( 16.1 arcmin) 107P/(4015)</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Two precoveries</title>
      <pubDate>Sat, 07 Nov 2009 14:39:51 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>Seiichi Yoshida</dc:creator>
      <link>http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/comets-ml/message/16099</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/comets-ml/message/16099</guid>
      <description>Dear Rob Matson, ... Recent M.P.E.C. 2009-V04 announced that the number 228P was assigned to P/2001 YX127 = P/2009 U2 (LINEAR). A permanent number was not </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: DOU MPEC 2009-V10: comet candidate? [NOT]</title>
      <pubDate>Thu, 05 Nov 2009 17:04:00 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>Gareth</dc:creator>
      <link>http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/comets-ml/message/16098</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/comets-ml/message/16098</guid>
      <description>... This appears to be a routine MBA.  There are only two nights of observation and the one-opposition orbit on MPEC V10 has been removed.  The MB Vaisala</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>DOU MPEC 2009-V10: comet candidate?</title>
      <pubDate>Thu, 05 Nov 2009 02:04:27 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>Reiner M. Stoss</dc:creator>
      <link>http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/comets-ml/message/16097</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/comets-ml/message/16097</guid>
      <description>http://www.cfa.harvard.edu/mpec/K09/K09V10.html Only the first two nights are available via MPCOBS. I can therefore not check if the orbit is okay or if it is</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: OT - Help on CCD choice</title>
      <pubDate>Wed, 04 Nov 2009 15:23:10 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>gvnn64@...</dc:creator>
      <link>http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/comets-ml/message/16096</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/comets-ml/message/16096</guid>
      <description>Hello Luca. ... IMHO it&#39;s better to constrain the dynamic range below 70%, or at least this was my esperience with a Starlight Xpress CCD I used for some time</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: OT - Help on CCD choice</title>
      <pubDate>Wed, 04 Nov 2009 13:55:59 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>buzzi_luca</dc:creator>
      <link>http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/comets-ml/message/16095</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/comets-ml/message/16095</guid>
      <description>Hi Giovanni, yes, of course I will set the proper settings in Astrometrica, to avoid to take stars that are under/above a certain limit. But such a CCD can be</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: OT - Help on CCD choice</title>
      <pubDate>Tue, 03 Nov 2009 19:59:34 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>gvnn64@...</dc:creator>
      <link>http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/comets-ml/message/16094</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/comets-ml/message/16094</guid>
      <description>I agree with Juan, a wise use of the &quot;Astrometrica&quot; settings, regards the bright end of the  magnitudes, should mitigate significantly the prpblem. Cheers, </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: OT - Help on CCD choice</title>
      <pubDate>Mon, 02 Nov 2009 15:47:27 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>Juan Lacruz</dc:creator>
      <link>http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/comets-ml/message/16093</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/comets-ml/message/16093</guid>
      <description>Luca, As far as I know, antiblooming works against linearity and is likely to affect the photometry of saturated targets, I don&#39;t think it may have any impact</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>OT - Help on CCD choice</title>
      <pubDate>Mon, 02 Nov 2009 15:22:02 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>luca_buzzi@...</dc:creator>
      <link>http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/comets-ml/message/16092</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/comets-ml/message/16092</guid>
      <description>Dear list, sorry for this off-topic, but on the web I&#39;ve found almost nothing and surely some of you can help me on this. We would like to change our CCD</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: 29P and C/2009 U6</title>
      <pubDate>Mon, 02 Nov 2009 01:19:08 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>P. Edward Murray</dc:creator>
      <link>http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/comets-ml/message/16091</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/comets-ml/message/16091</guid>
      <description>Thank you John:) Your &quot;neighbor&quot; just across the river in Bucks County.. Ed Murray [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: 29P and C/2009 U6</title>
      <pubDate>Mon, 02 Nov 2009 00:24:31 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>ohmegacentauri</dc:creator>
      <link>http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/comets-ml/message/16090</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/comets-ml/message/16090</guid>
      <description>Hi all. The morning Francois Kugel posted the photo of 81P/29P, I also saw the star trail to the right of 29P and dismissed it as an asteroid with a</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: 29P and C/2009 U6</title>
      <pubDate>Sun, 01 Nov 2009 21:28:56 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>Mr Wyatt</dc:creator>
      <link>http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/comets-ml/message/16089</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/comets-ml/message/16089</guid>
      <description>Thanks for your insight guys! It&#39;s a shame that there&#39;s so much conjecture regarding naming of comets discovered through media other than the discoverers own. </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: 29P and C/2009 U6</title>
      <pubDate>Sun, 01 Nov 2009 18:05:09 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>P. Edward Murray</dc:creator>
      <link>http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/comets-ml/message/16088</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/comets-ml/message/16088</guid>
      <description>Kevin, Oh yes I forgot ..and there are a few others too:) Please forgive me..they escaped my memory.. Yes I am all  for giving credit to folks who actually</description>
    </item>

  </channel>
</rss>
<!-- wr1.grp.sp2.yahoo.com uncompressed/chunked Sun Nov  8 03:54:13 PST 2009 -->
