<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" ?>
<rss xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>complexquantummechanics at Yahoo! Groups</title>
    <link>http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/complexquantummechanics/</link>
    <description>Complex Quantum Mechanics</description>

    <item>
      <title>SPAM - Warning</title>
      <pubDate>Sat, 06 Feb 2010 01:49:10 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>simplyswitchutilities</dc:creator>
      <link>http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/complexquantummechanics/message/735</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/complexquantummechanics/message/735</guid>
      <description>I just deleted a porn message. It contained a malicious virus. If you disagree with my theory you can say so. Please don&#39;t attack the membership here.</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>R. T. Cahill&#39;s Quantum Foam Theory</title>
      <pubDate>Wed, 03 Feb 2010 23:18:43 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>Fitz</dc:creator>
      <link>http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/complexquantummechanics/message/733</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/complexquantummechanics/message/733</guid>
      <description>R. T. Cahill&#39;s Quantum Foam Theory a bit more light about it (click link) http://www.amperefitz.com/cahill.htm &lt;http://www.amperefitz.com/cahill.htm&gt; Enjoy, </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Get the MOST from Google Groups</title>
      <pubDate>Thu, 07 Jan 2010 20:17:29 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>Fitz</dc:creator>
      <link>http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/complexquantummechanics/message/732</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/complexquantummechanics/message/732</guid>
      <description>Get the MOST from Google Groups I know you will WANT to post in this important Google Group </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>New updates...</title>
      <pubDate>Wed, 06 Jan 2010 19:24:59 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>JeffC</dc:creator>
      <link>http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/complexquantummechanics/message/731</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/complexquantummechanics/message/731</guid>
      <description>Hi, all. There has been one more page added to the New Electrogravity Theory at www.JeffreyNCook.com.  Also, I added a bit more of a description on the notion</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Important update / experiment at JeffreyNCook.com...</title>
      <pubDate>Mon, 28 Dec 2009 20:12:13 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>JeffC</dc:creator>
      <link>http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/complexquantummechanics/message/730</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/complexquantummechanics/message/730</guid>
      <description>Hello, all. It&#39;s interesting, as I&#39;ve only ever had three people asked to be removed from my mailing list in almost two years and both times were after I</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Einstein&#39;s photon</title>
      <pubDate>Sat, 26 Dec 2009 22:00:28 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>Fitz</dc:creator>
      <link>http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/complexquantummechanics/message/729</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/complexquantummechanics/message/729</guid>
      <description>Einstein&#39;s photon To see what Einstein&#39;s photon is and what space and time are read: http://www.amperefitz.com/photon.htm </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Why do we have the principle of equivalence ?</title>
      <pubDate>Thu, 17 Dec 2009 19:49:56 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>Fitz</dc:creator>
      <link>http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/complexquantummechanics/message/728</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/complexquantummechanics/message/728</guid>
      <description>Why do we have the principle of equivalence ? Or why is the gravitational force the same as an apparent acceleration? See:</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Einstein and Jeffrey N Cook</title>
      <pubDate>Sun, 06 Dec 2009 21:37:19 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>JeffC</dc:creator>
      <link>http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/complexquantummechanics/message/727</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/complexquantummechanics/message/727</guid>
      <description>Alex, You speak of your theories.  Where can one read up on them? Also, I really base my work only on literature than can be referenced, perhaps even</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Einstein and Jeffrey N Cook</title>
      <pubDate>Thu, 03 Dec 2009 12:18:46 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>simplyswitchutilities</dc:creator>
      <link>http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/complexquantummechanics/message/726</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/complexquantummechanics/message/726</guid>
      <description>Hello Jeff, I have taken a look at your work. I stumble over the particular knowledge you have about the orbital behaviour of hydrogen! I cannot do your work</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Einstein was mistaken &gt; Charge Pressure</title>
      <pubDate>Sat, 28 Nov 2009 14:47:47 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>simplyswitchutilities</dc:creator>
      <link>http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/complexquantummechanics/message/725</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/complexquantummechanics/message/725</guid>
      <description>Hello Jeff, You certainly have good conceptual idea that I like. &quot;Instead of using air pressure in terms of sound, I have presented charge pressure. Instead of</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Einstein was mistaken...</title>
      <pubDate>Thu, 26 Nov 2009 20:01:36 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>JeffC</dc:creator>
      <link>http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/complexquantummechanics/message/724</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/complexquantummechanics/message/724</guid>
      <description>Hi, All. Couple of updates to www.JeffreyNCook.com. Instead of trying to dig through Einstein&#39;s ideas to find out why he thought nothing could travel faster</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Stern Gerlach experiment and absurdities of modern physics</title>
      <pubDate>Sat, 21 Nov 2009 09:20:55 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>sorincosofret</dc:creator>
      <link>http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/complexquantummechanics/message/723</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/complexquantummechanics/message/723</guid>
      <description>Stern Gerlach experiment and absurdities of modern physics Stern and Gerlach experiment is one of the most representative experiments in quantum mechanic. The</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Manipulating Complex Numbers for mass and energy.</title>
      <pubDate>Fri, 13 Nov 2009 12:11:56 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>simplyswitchutilities</dc:creator>
      <link>http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/complexquantummechanics/message/722</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/complexquantummechanics/message/722</guid>
      <description>Hi Aravind, I think it is possible to do just that. Complex numbers are even more flexible as you can also use the real part to repesent the 3D state and the</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: The real meaning for complex numbers</title>
      <pubDate>Thu, 12 Nov 2009 18:07:02 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>Aravind aravind</dc:creator>
      <link>http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/complexquantummechanics/message/721</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/complexquantummechanics/message/721</guid>
      <description>Dear Alex, Thank you.Your explanation has helped.So, you say,in quantum mechanics that the real part represents matter and imaginary represents energy or wave</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: The real meaning for complex numbers</title>
      <pubDate>Thu, 12 Nov 2009 11:36:45 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>simplyswitchutilities</dc:creator>
      <link>http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/complexquantummechanics/message/720</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/complexquantummechanics/message/720</guid>
      <description>Hello Aravind, Welcome to the group. You are correct that TRADITIONAL QM views complex numbers as describing probability waves. You have taken a professional</description>
    </item>

  </channel>
</rss>
<!-- wr1.grp.sp2.yahoo.com uncompressed/chunked Wed Feb 10 03:16:57 PST 2010 -->
