<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" ?>
<rss xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>concatenative at Yahoo! Groups</title>
    <link>http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/concatenative/</link>
    <description>Discuss the concatenative variety of computer languages: Joy, Forth, Postscript</description>

    <item>
      <title>Re: ANN: Concatenative Macro Processor</title>
      <pubDate>Sat, 04 Jul 2009 12:50:03 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>eas lab</dc:creator>
      <link>http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/concatenative/message/4625</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/concatenative/message/4625</guid>
      <description>Just to keep the pipes exercised [I suspected that I&#39;d been cut-off of cat-list [what&#39;s happening in the 1st-world/N-hemisphere &#39;for&#39; no cat-list-traffic ?] ] </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>ANN: Concatenative Macro Processor</title>
      <pubDate>Tue, 23 Jun 2009 01:10:02 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>Mark W. Humphries</dc:creator>
      <link>http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/concatenative/message/4624</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/concatenative/message/4624</guid>
      <description>Minimac (http://freshmeat.net/projects/minimac-macro-processor) is a minimalist, general purpose text macro processor. It uses an explicit argument stack, and</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: proof/examples of productivety increase ?</title>
      <pubDate>Mon, 27 Apr 2009 16:00:32 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>William Tanksley</dc:creator>
      <link>http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/concatenative/message/4623</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/concatenative/message/4623</guid>
      <description>... Yes and no. A language like Joy yes; Joy itself NO. Joy is an academic prototype, not really intended for any specific use. ... Right. The concatenative</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: proof/examples of productivety increase ?</title>
      <pubDate>Mon, 27 Apr 2009 11:41:59 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>Nigel Galloway</dc:creator>
      <link>http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/concatenative/message/4622</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/concatenative/message/4622</guid>
      <description>Should a language like Joy be compared to Java. Java compiles into class files, which consist of bytecodes, which is  assembler like code for the JVM.   Joy</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>list about PL design</title>
      <pubDate>Mon, 20 Apr 2009 17:23:58 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>spir</dc:creator>
      <link>http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/concatenative/message/4621</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/concatenative/message/4621</guid>
      <description>Hello, just started a mailing list about programming language design. It&#39;s called &#39;PiLuD&#39; ;-) For anyone interested. subscribe  :</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>proof/examples of productivety increase ?</title>
      <pubDate>Sun, 12 Apr 2009 15:44:16 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>chris glur</dc:creator>
      <link>http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/concatenative/message/4620</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/concatenative/message/4620</guid>
      <description>On cleaning out archives of Tue, Apr 29, 2008 at 10:20 AM ... I wondered is there a tutorial on &#39;algebra of concatenative programs&#39;, preferably without another</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Motivations to embrace undecidable type systems</title>
      <pubDate>Mon, 06 Apr 2009 12:01:03 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>John Nowak</dc:creator>
      <link>http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/concatenative/message/4619</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/concatenative/message/4619</guid>
      <description>... It seems to me that some of the most interesting work in this field (type systems for compilers) is being done by the Church Project</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Compression: Huffman Coding with Joy</title>
      <pubDate>Sun, 05 Apr 2009 12:40:51 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>icpdesign</dc:creator>
      <link>http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/concatenative/message/4618</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/concatenative/message/4618</guid>
      <description>Dear, You can find the F# code for Huffman coding in http://blogs.msdn.com/lukeh/archive/2008/05/05/huffman-coding-with-f.aspx Kind regards Taoufik</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Compression: Huffman Coding with Joy</title>
      <pubDate>Sun, 05 Apr 2009 12:35:15 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>icpdesign</dc:creator>
      <link>http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/concatenative/message/4617</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/concatenative/message/4617</guid>
      <description>Dear, How do you implement the Huffman Coding with Joy? I would like to compare it with other languages (eg. F#) Kind regards Taoufik</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Motivations to embrace undecidable type systems</title>
      <pubDate>Sun, 05 Apr 2009 09:09:40 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>hallucious</dc:creator>
      <link>http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/concatenative/message/4616</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/concatenative/message/4616</guid>
      <description>Hi John, Thanks for the info and for bearing with me. I do want to move on to type systems that are useful for compilers. I shall clarify the subordinate role</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Motivations to embrace undecidable type systems</title>
      <pubDate>Sun, 05 Apr 2009 06:28:07 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>John Nowak</dc:creator>
      <link>http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/concatenative/message/4615</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/concatenative/message/4615</guid>
      <description>... It&#39;s easy to infer the constraints, but type inference (I believe) also entails checking that those constraints are satisfied and not in contradiction to</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Motivations to embrace decidable type systems</title>
      <pubDate>Sun, 05 Apr 2009 06:18:02 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>John Nowak</dc:creator>
      <link>http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/concatenative/message/4614</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/concatenative/message/4614</guid>
      <description>... You may want to look at Djinn if you haven&#39;t already: http://lambda-the-ultimate.org/node/1178 ... In my opinion, it would be more useful to add types</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Motivations to embrace undecidable type systems</title>
      <pubDate>Sun, 05 Apr 2009 01:42:35 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>hallucious</dc:creator>
      <link>http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/concatenative/message/4613</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/concatenative/message/4613</guid>
      <description>If decidable type inference means that the type of quotations and compositions of functions can be inferred and expressed, then I think that type inference is</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Motivations to embrace undecidable type systems</title>
      <pubDate>Sun, 05 Apr 2009 01:14:21 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>hallucious</dc:creator>
      <link>http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/concatenative/message/4612</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/concatenative/message/4612</guid>
      <description>One motivation for this work was to broaden the range of functions which can be investigated by looking at their type, which can be useful to see their effect.</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Type for row based languages</title>
      <pubDate>Sat, 04 Apr 2009 23:08:38 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>John Nowak</dc:creator>
      <link>http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/concatenative/message/4610</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/concatenative/message/4610</guid>
      <description>One more thing I should&#39;ve mentioned. You state that your type system is compositional. I should note that you can get this quite easy by extending HM with row</description>
    </item>

  </channel>
</rss>
<!-- wr2.grp.sp2.yahoo.com uncompressed/chunked Sun Jul  5 03:41:40 PDT 2009 -->
