<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" ?>
<rss xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>confucius-list at Yahoo! Groups</title>
    <link>http://groups.yahoo.com/group/confucius-list/</link>
    <description>Confucius List</description>

    <item>
      <title>PRC governmentality</title>
      <pubDate>Tue, 07 Jul 2009 22:46:22 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>David Olson</dc:creator>
      <link>http://groups.yahoo.com/group/confucius-list/message/3080</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://groups.yahoo.com/group/confucius-list/message/3080</guid>
      <description>I received a notice of the following book, but haven&#39;t checked it out for myself. (Too busy to surf for book reviews) (the good ones would all be on JSTOR </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: the Jen ratio</title>
      <pubDate>Tue, 23 Jun 2009 02:38:39 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>Eric S</dc:creator>
      <link>http://groups.yahoo.com/group/confucius-list/message/3079</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://groups.yahoo.com/group/confucius-list/message/3079</guid>
      <description>David,   What intrigued me about Keltner was the linking of jen with evolutionary psychology.  I recognize emotional and social intelligence are valid</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: the Jen ratio</title>
      <pubDate>Tue, 23 Jun 2009 02:37:12 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>Eric S</dc:creator>
      <link>http://groups.yahoo.com/group/confucius-list/message/3078</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://groups.yahoo.com/group/confucius-list/message/3078</guid>
      <description>Robert,   I pretty much agree in general with what you are saying in the first part of my email. See my other post to David.   I&#39;m familar with de Chardin</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: the Jen ratio</title>
      <pubDate>Sun, 21 Jun 2009 00:41:22 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>ROBERT CANRIGHT</dc:creator>
      <link>http://groups.yahoo.com/group/confucius-list/message/3077</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://groups.yahoo.com/group/confucius-list/message/3077</guid>
      <description>You said:  &quot;Perhaps the next religious revival will be composed of such neo-neo-Confucians, primative Christian revivalists and atheists for Jesus.&quot; When I</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: the Jen ratio</title>
      <pubDate>Sun, 21 Jun 2009 00:40:09 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>David Olson</dc:creator>
      <link>http://groups.yahoo.com/group/confucius-list/message/3076</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://groups.yahoo.com/group/confucius-list/message/3076</guid>
      <description>... Daniel Goleman, _Social Intelligence_ is better. &quot;social intelligence&quot; is a good working-translation for &quot;jen&quot; (ren). Dacher Keltner is somewhat loose in</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: the Jen ratio</title>
      <pubDate>Sat, 20 Jun 2009 16:03:50 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>Eric S</dc:creator>
      <link>http://groups.yahoo.com/group/confucius-list/message/3075</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://groups.yahoo.com/group/confucius-list/message/3075</guid>
      <description>Hi David,   Excellent post.  I&#39;m tempted to read this book.     What is interesting to me, of course, is that this emphasis on natural goodness derives </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>the Jen ratio</title>
      <pubDate>Sat, 20 Jun 2009 08:02:29 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>David Olson</dc:creator>
      <link>http://groups.yahoo.com/group/confucius-list/message/3074</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://groups.yahoo.com/group/confucius-list/message/3074</guid>
      <description>A recent book by a psychologist who speaks of &quot;jen science&quot; and &quot;jen ratio&quot;. Dacher Keltner, _Born to be Good: The Science of a Meaningful Life_, Second </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Analects 15.20</title>
      <pubDate>Thu, 18 Jun 2009 01:23:39 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>Thomas</dc:creator>
      <link>http://groups.yahoo.com/group/confucius-list/message/3073</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://groups.yahoo.com/group/confucius-list/message/3073</guid>
      <description>The Master said, &quot;The superior man dislikes the thought of his name not being mentioned after his death.&quot; (Legge 15.19) There is a fine commentary of this</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Roh suicide, politics and Confucianism</title>
      <pubDate>Fri, 29 May 2009 09:49:44 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>yao sugiar</dc:creator>
      <link>http://groups.yahoo.com/group/confucius-list/message/3072</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://groups.yahoo.com/group/confucius-list/message/3072</guid>
      <description>About corruptions have been explained at Daxue XI.22. 长国家而务财用者，必自小人矣。 </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Roh suicide, politics and Confucianism</title>
      <pubDate>Fri, 29 May 2009 07:25:22 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>yewzerble</dc:creator>
      <link>http://groups.yahoo.com/group/confucius-list/message/3071</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://groups.yahoo.com/group/confucius-list/message/3071</guid>
      <description>... Sorry, apparently the glyphs don&#39;t come through...... The source text, with Chinese -- Doctrine of the Mean, XX.10. </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Roh suicide, politics and Confucianism</title>
      <pubDate>Fri, 29 May 2009 03:50:02 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>david@...</dc:creator>
      <link>http://groups.yahoo.com/group/confucius-list/message/3070</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://groups.yahoo.com/group/confucius-list/message/3070</guid>
      <description>... Well I only received 25 hits for this on Google -- and most seemed to be about Roh&#39;s suicide. Did the traditional saying come into existence in the last</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Roh suicide, politics and Confucianism</title>
      <pubDate>Fri, 29 May 2009 02:40:30 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>Todd Cameron Thacker</dc:creator>
      <link>http://groups.yahoo.com/group/confucius-list/message/3069</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://groups.yahoo.com/group/confucius-list/message/3069</guid>
      <description>Roh Moo-hyun?s death evokes sympathy By S.L. Shen UPI Correspondent Published: May 28, 2009 </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Judge quotes Confucius</title>
      <pubDate>Fri, 15 May 2009 08:52:19 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>Peter Lo</dc:creator>
      <link>http://groups.yahoo.com/group/confucius-list/message/3068</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://groups.yahoo.com/group/confucius-list/message/3068</guid>
      <description>david, Would you be supplying a less mysterious answer?  Or has this been dealt with off-list? Peter Lo __________</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>NYT: The Confucian Party</title>
      <pubDate>Tue, 12 May 2009 05:47:20 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>Todd Cameron Thacker</dc:creator>
      <link>http://groups.yahoo.com/group/confucius-list/message/3067</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://groups.yahoo.com/group/confucius-list/message/3067</guid>
      <description>Op/Ed http://www.nytimes.com/2009/05/12/opinion/12iht-edbell.html?src=twr&amp;pagewanted=print By DANIEL A. BELL BEIJING ? Twenty years ago, the biggest</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Judge quotes Confucius</title>
      <pubDate>Mon, 11 May 2009 23:22:42 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>robert matusan - boyler</dc:creator>
      <link>http://groups.yahoo.com/group/confucius-list/message/3066</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://groups.yahoo.com/group/confucius-list/message/3066</guid>
      <description>Hi Todd, david, Peter, ... first ... in ... Sorry, I did not got it :o( Is it really a saying of Master Kong (as I don&#39;t recall I&#39;ve read it, but then again,</description>
    </item>

  </channel>
</rss>
<!-- wr1.grp.sp2.yahoo.com uncompressed/chunked Sat Jul 11 05:44:35 PDT 2009 -->
