<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" ?>
<rss xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>covenantedreformationclub at Yahoo! Groups</title>
    <link>http://groups.yahoo.com/group/covenantedreformationclub/</link>
    <description>The Covenanted Reformation Club</description>

    <item>
      <title>Re: Was the Mosiac Covenant a NEW Covenant of Works?</title>
      <pubDate>Wed, 20 Jan 2010 12:04:12 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>Ben Rochester</dc:creator>
      <link>http://groups.yahoo.com/group/covenantedreformationclub/message/16896</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://groups.yahoo.com/group/covenantedreformationclub/message/16896</guid>
      <description>Yes, Murray did not agree with the typical formulation of the CoW. However, his view is not a denial of a works principle in the Garden (See his Romans</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Was the Mosiac Covenant a NEW Covenant of Works?</title>
      <pubDate>Tue, 19 Jan 2010 20:51:50 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>bob_suden</dc:creator>
      <link>http://groups.yahoo.com/group/covenantedreformationclub/message/16895</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://groups.yahoo.com/group/covenantedreformationclub/message/16895</guid>
      <description>Edgar, &quot;It appears&quot;? We have to do better than that. I can&#39;t speak for Kline, or Escondido for that matter, but I can&#39;t say Kerux has got a handle on it</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Was the Mosiac Covenant a NEW Covenant of Works?</title>
      <pubDate>Mon, 18 Jan 2010 05:42:55 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>PuritanoPresbiteriano</dc:creator>
      <link>http://groups.yahoo.com/group/covenantedreformationclub/message/16894</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://groups.yahoo.com/group/covenantedreformationclub/message/16894</guid>
      <description>Hey Bob! It appears that WW is teaching/propagating Kline&#39;s view that the Mosaic covenant was meritorious, i.e. the way to earn God&#39;s favor and that is what</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Was the Mosiac Covenant a NEW Covenant of Works?</title>
      <pubDate>Mon, 18 Jan 2010 04:56:53 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>PuritanoPresbiteriano</dc:creator>
      <link>http://groups.yahoo.com/group/covenantedreformationclub/message/16893</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://groups.yahoo.com/group/covenantedreformationclub/message/16893</guid>
      <description>Ben, To be honest I am ignorant of modern resources that follow the vein of Murray.  This is not to say there isn&#39;t any, I am just not very familiar with</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Was the Mosiac Covenant a NEW Covenant of Works?</title>
      <pubDate>Sun, 17 Jan 2010 21:33:19 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>bob_suden</dc:creator>
      <link>http://groups.yahoo.com/group/covenantedreformationclub/message/16892</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://groups.yahoo.com/group/covenantedreformationclub/message/16892</guid>
      <description>... Edgar, What is being taught? By Kerux/NW or by WW? John Murray questioned, if not disagreed with the WCF regarding the covenant of works (CoW), did he not?</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Was the Mosiac Covenant a NEW Covenant of Works?</title>
      <pubDate>Thu, 14 Jan 2010 20:10:41 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>Ben Rochester</dc:creator>
      <link>http://groups.yahoo.com/group/covenantedreformationclub/message/16891</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://groups.yahoo.com/group/covenantedreformationclub/message/16891</guid>
      <description>I have heard a great deal over the years at Westminster concerning their view. I have been essentially shooting in the dark on my own exploration of Covenant</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Was the Mosiac Covenant a NEW Covenant of Works?</title>
      <pubDate>Thu, 14 Jan 2010 02:40:01 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>PuritanoPresbiteriano</dc:creator>
      <link>http://groups.yahoo.com/group/covenantedreformationclub/message/16890</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://groups.yahoo.com/group/covenantedreformationclub/message/16890</guid>
      <description>Hi Ben, Well, the link I provided is a review of Rev. Fesko&#39;s book he edited titled _The Law is not of Faith_ and the reviewers are very critical of the essays</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Was the Mosiac Covenant a NEW Covenant of Works?</title>
      <pubDate>Wed, 13 Jan 2010 23:37:39 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>Ben Rochester</dc:creator>
      <link>http://groups.yahoo.com/group/covenantedreformationclub/message/16889</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://groups.yahoo.com/group/covenantedreformationclub/message/16889</guid>
      <description>I am a John Murray sympathetic student at Westminster West. I would like more information on this if you could point it out to me. Benjamin Rochester ... </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Was the Mosiac Covenant a NEW Covenant of Works?</title>
      <pubDate>Tue, 12 Jan 2010 21:44:41 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>PuritanoPresbiteriano</dc:creator>
      <link>http://groups.yahoo.com/group/covenantedreformationclub/message/16888</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://groups.yahoo.com/group/covenantedreformationclub/message/16888</guid>
      <description>This is being taught in at least one conservative Reformed Seminary. Read: http://www.kerux.com/pdf/Kerux%2024.3%20(Dec%202009).pdf </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Learning is present tense</title>
      <pubDate>Thu, 07 Jan 2010 22:00:56 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>Pearl</dc:creator>
      <link>http://groups.yahoo.com/group/covenantedreformationclub/message/16887</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://groups.yahoo.com/group/covenantedreformationclub/message/16887</guid>
      <description>Thursday, January 7, 2010 To the Discussion Club, It is a sad day for the poor scattered flock of the Lord Jesus Christ, and in another sense an opportunity to</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: The Lord&#39;s Supper, the Biblical (&amp;Scottish) way</title>
      <pubDate>Thu, 07 Jan 2010 04:53:46 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>PuritanoPresbiteriano</dc:creator>
      <link>http://groups.yahoo.com/group/covenantedreformationclub/message/16886</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://groups.yahoo.com/group/covenantedreformationclub/message/16886</guid>
      <description>Parnell, It was the case in Geneva and elsewhere that there were worship services every day in the early morning.  I think that Capitalism, but more so the</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: The Lord&#39;s Supper, the Biblical (&amp;Scottish) way</title>
      <pubDate>Wed, 06 Jan 2010 21:30:14 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>puritanone</dc:creator>
      <link>http://groups.yahoo.com/group/covenantedreformationclub/message/16885</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://groups.yahoo.com/group/covenantedreformationclub/message/16885</guid>
      <description>... Edgar, I would not disagree with you, which is why in my earlier post I focused on the *Scottish* way, and did not insist it was the one and only Biblical</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: The Lord&#39;s Supper, the Biblical (&amp;Scottish) way</title>
      <pubDate>Wed, 06 Jan 2010 05:02:50 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>PuritanoPresbiteriano</dc:creator>
      <link>http://groups.yahoo.com/group/covenantedreformationclub/message/16884</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://groups.yahoo.com/group/covenantedreformationclub/message/16884</guid>
      <description>Dear Pearl, My intent was to invite people to Church that happen to live in the DC Metro area. Not sure how you read into it more than that? Not sure what you</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: The Lord&#39;s Supper, the Biblical (&amp;Scottish) way</title>
      <pubDate>Wed, 06 Jan 2010 04:41:27 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>PuritanoPresbiteriano</dc:creator>
      <link>http://groups.yahoo.com/group/covenantedreformationclub/message/16883</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://groups.yahoo.com/group/covenantedreformationclub/message/16883</guid>
      <description>Parnell, Now that I think about it a bit more...would not the days you mention before &amp; after the Supper be properly called the Communion Season? Whereas I was</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: The Lord&#39;s Supper, the Biblical (&amp;Scottish) way</title>
      <pubDate>Wed, 06 Jan 2010 02:47:31 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>PuritanoPresbiteriano</dc:creator>
      <link>http://groups.yahoo.com/group/covenantedreformationclub/message/16882</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://groups.yahoo.com/group/covenantedreformationclub/message/16882</guid>
      <description>Hey Parnell! Yeah, you got me there!  I have no answer for you but that those two extra days are not done here in the US. My personal opinion - a casualty of</description>
    </item>

  </channel>
</rss>
<!-- wr2.grp.sp2.yahoo.com uncompressed/chunked Sun Mar 28 18:44:34 PDT 2010 -->
