<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" ?>
<rss xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>cph_theory at Yahoo! Groups</title>
    <link>http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/cph_theory/</link>
    <description>CPH_Theory</description>

    <item>
      <title>Re: physics mathematical proofs</title>
      <pubDate>Thu, 09 Jul 2009 15:55:58 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>Allen Francom</dc:creator>
      <link>http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/cph_theory/message/8882</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/cph_theory/message/8882</guid>
      <description>... This is suggested by the quantum realm where &#39;reality&#39; is much more about the events that happen than any &#39;solid substance sitting there&#39;. Such that we</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: physics mathematical proofs</title>
      <pubDate>Thu, 09 Jul 2009 14:04:22 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>Jaime Pardo</dc:creator>
      <link>http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/cph_theory/message/8881</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/cph_theory/message/8881</guid>
      <description>&quot;What is illusion and what is really&quot;-Moody Blues? theoretical ideals maybe more real and at least longer lasting than practical reality. A supposition that</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: physics mathematical proofs</title>
      <pubDate>Wed, 08 Jul 2009 14:41:23 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>Allen Francom</dc:creator>
      <link>http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/cph_theory/message/8880</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/cph_theory/message/8880</guid>
      <description>That is NOT to say, &quot;illusory&quot;.   * can be * In fact, the mathematical analysis can HELP elucidate what might really be going on. In this way the Math acts</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: physics mathematical proofs</title>
      <pubDate>Wed, 08 Jul 2009 13:14:19 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>Jaime Pardo</dc:creator>
      <link>http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/cph_theory/message/8879</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/cph_theory/message/8879</guid>
      <description>Thank you Allen and Alex, You have given me food for thought. Maybe this might add some flavor to your discussion. Physics is the process of analyzing the</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: [QuacksAnonymous] RE: [Theoretical_Physics] Cosmological Distanc</title>
      <pubDate>Wed, 08 Jul 2009 08:45:44 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>Tony Bermanseder</dc:creator>
      <link>http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/cph_theory/message/8878</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/cph_theory/message/8878</guid>
      <description>So... Primarily &quot;space&quot; is simply on or about &#39;electro-magnetic&#39; until we get sub-atomic... -Yes, space, time, mass etc all blend on the string scales in terms</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: [QuacksAnonymous] RE: [Theoretical_Physics] Cosmological Distanc</title>
      <pubDate>Tue, 07 Jul 2009 19:27:25 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>Tony Bermanseder</dc:creator>
      <link>http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/cph_theory/message/8877</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/cph_theory/message/8877</guid>
      <description>... You may see here, where the solution to the nonparity between matter and antimatter lies. The Higgs Boson does not exist as an independent particle, as its</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: [QuacksAnonymous] RE: [Theoretical_Physics] Cosmological Distanc</title>
      <pubDate>Tue, 07 Jul 2009 16:23:01 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>Tony Bermanseder</dc:creator>
      <link>http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/cph_theory/message/8876</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/cph_theory/message/8876</guid>
      <description>Wow... That was ALMOST complete I need some time to formulate a further question when it comes to the Anti-Higgs Boson issue(s) to be sure. Reminder to self:</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Harp-Therapy</title>
      <pubDate>Tue, 07 Jul 2009 12:43:35 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>Tony Bermanseder</dc:creator>
      <link>http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/cph_theory/message/8875</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/cph_theory/message/8875</guid>
      <description>Hi Tony, I?m enjoying your website, although I?m not a physicist, so the math is a little over my head. The field of harp therapy has evolved over the past</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: [QuacksAnonymous] RE: [Theoretical_Physics] Cosmological Distanc</title>
      <pubDate>Tue, 07 Jul 2009 10:52:28 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>Tony Bermanseder</dc:creator>
      <link>http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/cph_theory/message/8874</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/cph_theory/message/8874</guid>
      <description>... Okay, forgive me for asking, and I know better than to expect a short answer but I can always Pray on humbled knees... I can get that we can have a</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: [Theoretical_Physics] Cosmological Distance Measurements/Brian L</title>
      <pubDate>Tue, 07 Jul 2009 08:43:54 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>Tony Bermanseder</dc:creator>
      <link>http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/cph_theory/message/8873</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/cph_theory/message/8873</guid>
      <description>Brian Lawson said: -just to get an understanding, the observation of galaxies in slow motion -is taken into consideration when visualizing distant galaxies? </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Cosmological Distance Measurements/Brian Lawson</title>
      <pubDate>Mon, 06 Jul 2009 08:06:26 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>Tony Bermanseder</dc:creator>
      <link>http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/cph_theory/message/8872</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/cph_theory/message/8872</guid>
      <description>im hoping the &quot;Great and Terrible&quot; Tony B can shed some light on this. or anyone else in the know...:) ... From: brian lawson &lt;lawdawg7051@...&gt; Subject:</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: physics mathematical proofs</title>
      <pubDate>Wed, 01 Jul 2009 21:17:35 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>Allen Francom</dc:creator>
      <link>http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/cph_theory/message/8871</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/cph_theory/message/8871</guid>
      <description>Consider, physics is the process of analysis. Math is the language of recording the analysis. Physics does not explain things.  It merely describes them. Math</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Magnetic effects around electric currents and absurdities of modern </title>
      <pubDate>Wed, 01 Jul 2009 06:07:05 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>sorincosofret</dc:creator>
      <link>http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/cph_theory/message/8870</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/cph_theory/message/8870</guid>
      <description>Magnetic effects around electric currents and absurdities of modern physics It is assumed by actual physics that an electric current traveling along a</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>physics mathematical proofs</title>
      <pubDate>Wed, 01 Jul 2009 06:05:06 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>alexandrisn</dc:creator>
      <link>http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/cph_theory/message/8869</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/cph_theory/message/8869</guid>
      <description>Physics is not mathematics , you can not move the coeficients , any place have different natural meaning , so mathematics in physics is dimensional analysis ,</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>How ,,induction lamp works and absurdities of quantum hypothesis</title>
      <pubDate>Wed, 01 Jul 2009 06:03:35 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>sorincosofret</dc:creator>
      <link>http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/cph_theory/message/8868</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/cph_theory/message/8868</guid>
      <description>How ,,induction&#39;&#39; lamp works and absurdities of quantum hypothesis The induction lamp mechanism contradicts both classical electromagnetism and quantum theory.</description>
    </item>

  </channel>
</rss>
<!-- wr1.grp.sp2.yahoo.com uncompressed/chunked Sat Jul 11 11:28:57 PDT 2009 -->
