creation_evolution_debate at Yahoo! Groups

Re: Just how well does Gabor know Original Xianity?

ochs_matt — Wed, 11 Nov 2009 15:09:17 GMT

... Gabor has said that he is NOT just presenting his FEELINGS. Instead Gabor claims to have thought all of this through and HE - Gabor - arrived at

who cares ? where is the evidence ?Re: Angry reactions of Evolutioni

tinroad66 — Wed, 11 Nov 2009 15:06:17 GMT

... Tin: Who cares ? Isn't science really all about the EVIDENCE ? Where is YOUR evidence ? You don't seem to have any !

Re: No rain until Noah's flood?

tinroad66 — Wed, 11 Nov 2009 14:58:07 GMT

... Tin: Name one modern scientific theory that includes a Global Flood 35,000 years ago --- or ever for that matter.

C-B, knows nothing...Re: The Cambrian Explosion

tinroad66 — Wed, 11 Nov 2009 14:56:33 GMT

... Tin: Invalid question due to false premise. ... Tin: This is wrong too. Faith is not required to understand that humans are caring, feeling, creatures

Re: A Hundred Years Ago

Phil — Wed, 11 Nov 2009 14:51:46 GMT

... Phil Schuster: Chase girls? .. Does that mean female students are all lesbians?

Large Scale Transitional in the CambrianRe: The Cambrian Explosion

tinroad66 — Wed, 11 Nov 2009 14:50:18 GMT

... Tin: WRONG! Aside from the many small scale transitionals that Randy focuses there are large scale transitionals. For example, there are lobopods which

Re: Just how well does Gabor know Original Xianity?

gabor horvath — Wed, 11 Nov 2009 14:42:25 GMT

FRWHL: Gabor, how well do you know the "Original" Christianity, the first one, the one promising the Kingdom of Heaven and "second coming" within the lifetime

Re: Raging Creationists' Methane Buildup

ochs_matt — Wed, 11 Nov 2009 14:29:53 GMT

... "As will be all too evident when we examine the creationist position in detail, their arguments are devoid of any real intellectual content." Niles

Re: Pitcher of warm milk

isaac — Wed, 11 Nov 2009 14:29:02 GMT

... Engaging twit filter in 5...4...3...2... NOW!

Re: Raging Atheists

Elena Zevetse — Wed, 11 Nov 2009 14:26:50 GMT

________________________________ From: Laurie Appleton To: creation_evolution_debate@yahoogroups.com Sent: Wed, November 11, 2009

Re: A Hundred Years Ago

ochs_matt — Wed, 11 Nov 2009 14:17:23 GMT

... Dindy: That may explain why you didn't seem to learn much in school, dear, if that was your primary aim.

Re: Pitcher of warm milk

ochs_matt — Wed, 11 Nov 2009 14:14:48 GMT

... Jamesie ... MATT: The fossil record in chronological order of complexity: first bacteria below first multicellular organism below first shelled organisms

Re: What a creationist "believes"....Re: Junk RNA

Doug McDaniel — Wed, 11 Nov 2009 13:49:46 GMT

At last we are dealing with specifics. Thank you for that, Dave. I want to address both of the points that you raise, but I can't do that in one post.

Re: A Hundred Years Ago

Bill Robinson — Wed, 11 Nov 2009 13:39:08 GMT

BR: Not quite sure why you thanked Dindy since this does not support your position. LA> On the contrary it fits very well. It shows that evolutionary dating is

I think this is funny

Phil — Wed, 11 Nov 2009 13:38:40 GMT

BILL ROBINSON (to Laurie Appleton): Instead of trying to change the subject perhaps you would care to point out where you think my statements are wrong and