<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" ?>
<rss xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>creationism at Yahoo! Groups</title>
    <link>http://groups.yahoo.com/group/creationism/</link>
    <description>This email list is for discussing creationism, and for discussing various aspects of religion, philosophy, or science which are</description>

    <item>
      <title>Re: Teach The Controversy: Faith healing as good as medical treatmen</title>
      <pubDate>Fri, 20 Nov 2009 17:25:01 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>Randy C</dc:creator>
      <link>http://groups.yahoo.com/group/creationism/message/66984</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://groups.yahoo.com/group/creationism/message/66984</guid>
      <description>... I agree that you could say that a doctor who prescribes a placebo is lying to their patient in a way.  But the most important goal of the physician is to</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Teach The Controversy: Faith healing as good as medical treatmen</title>
      <pubDate>Fri, 20 Nov 2009 13:37:28 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>Michael Elphick</dc:creator>
      <link>http://groups.yahoo.com/group/creationism/message/66983</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://groups.yahoo.com/group/creationism/message/66983</guid>
      <description>On Monday, November 16 Randy C wrote:- ... Whilst I broadly agree with this, you do put your finger on a key issue - the placebo effect. This can be pretty</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Teach The Controversy: Faith healing as good as medical treatmen</title>
      <pubDate>Mon, 16 Nov 2009 02:37:10 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>Randy C</dc:creator>
      <link>http://groups.yahoo.com/group/creationism/message/66982</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://groups.yahoo.com/group/creationism/message/66982</guid>
      <description>... I don&#39;t think that&#39;s even the issue. The rule is simple: the government should only fund medical procedures that have scientific evidence showing that they</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Teach The Controversy: Faith healing as good as medical treatmen</title>
      <pubDate>Mon, 16 Nov 2009 00:45:57 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>jacktogery</dc:creator>
      <link>http://groups.yahoo.com/group/creationism/message/66981</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://groups.yahoo.com/group/creationism/message/66981</guid>
      <description>... JackTogery..</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: The Key to proving the Apparent Age Argument</title>
      <pubDate>Wed, 11 Nov 2009 20:44:11 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>Todd Greene</dc:creator>
      <link>http://groups.yahoo.com/group/creationism/message/66980</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://groups.yahoo.com/group/creationism/message/66980</guid>
      <description>You have presented no &quot;science&quot;. It is YOUR job to PRESENT SOME ACTUAL SCIENTIFIC research. You pseudoscience promoters are always so fun. You present a bunch</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: The Key to proving the Apparent Age Argument</title>
      <pubDate>Wed, 11 Nov 2009 20:40:37 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>Todd Greene</dc:creator>
      <link>http://groups.yahoo.com/group/creationism/message/66979</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://groups.yahoo.com/group/creationism/message/66979</guid>
      <description>Hi David, I see that you enjoy making things up based on folk stories and urban myths. Religious belief may be fun, for some people, but it certainly has</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: The Key to proving the Apparent Age Argument</title>
      <pubDate>Wed, 11 Nov 2009 04:58:36 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>Alan</dc:creator>
      <link>http://groups.yahoo.com/group/creationism/message/66978</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://groups.yahoo.com/group/creationism/message/66978</guid>
      <description>... He says so, yes, although he didn&#39;t actually say what he did. Is there somewhere where his experiments are documented in more detail? I&#39;m assuming so, as</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: The Key to proving the Apparent Age Argument</title>
      <pubDate>Wed, 11 Nov 2009 04:52:36 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>Alan</dc:creator>
      <link>http://groups.yahoo.com/group/creationism/message/66977</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://groups.yahoo.com/group/creationism/message/66977</guid>
      <description>... Perhaps you could tell us what you mean by both of those terms, and then we could decide?</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: The Key to proving the Apparent Age Argument</title>
      <pubDate>Tue, 10 Nov 2009 22:05:42 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>Eric</dc:creator>
      <link>http://groups.yahoo.com/group/creationism/message/66976</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://groups.yahoo.com/group/creationism/message/66976</guid>
      <description>Hi, I&#39;m going to jump in here.  It is very difficult to even begin to explain where the &#39;science&#39; presented is flawed since there is very little of any</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: The Key to proving the Apparent Age Argument</title>
      <pubDate>Tue, 10 Nov 2009 20:33:36 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>theoferrumii</dc:creator>
      <link>http://groups.yahoo.com/group/creationism/message/66975</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://groups.yahoo.com/group/creationism/message/66975</guid>
      <description>And, perhaps, since this is just &quot;Pseudo Science&quot; you could explain to everyone where in individual&#39;s Science is flawed in the article below - note that he</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: The Key to proving the Apparent Age Argument</title>
      <pubDate>Tue, 10 Nov 2009 17:29:51 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>David Hill</dc:creator>
      <link>http://groups.yahoo.com/group/creationism/message/66974</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://groups.yahoo.com/group/creationism/message/66974</guid>
      <description>Well, Mr. Greene, I assume that you consider the Anomalous Artifact Fossil Record to be Pseudo Science also, huh.   What do you believe about the Virgin</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: The Key to proving the Apparent Age Argument</title>
      <pubDate>Tue, 10 Nov 2009 17:13:45 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>Todd Greene</dc:creator>
      <link>http://groups.yahoo.com/group/creationism/message/66973</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://groups.yahoo.com/group/creationism/message/66973</guid>
      <description>Pseudoscience comes in many shapes and forms and sizes. There is no actual scientific research evidence that Brown&#39;s gas &quot;neutralizes&quot; radioactive waste. In</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Evolution v. Creationism: the Politics, the Science, the Debate</title>
      <pubDate>Tue, 10 Nov 2009 04:23:37 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>Todd Greene</dc:creator>
      <link>http://groups.yahoo.com/group/creationism/message/66972</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://groups.yahoo.com/group/creationism/message/66972</guid>
      <description>Evolution v. Creationism: the Politics, the Science, the Debate A panel discussion exploring the politics and science surrounding the evolution v. creationism</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>News item - Debris of planetary system of star HR 8799 studied</title>
      <pubDate>Tue, 10 Nov 2009 04:05:22 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>Todd Greene</dc:creator>
      <link>http://groups.yahoo.com/group/creationism/message/66971</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://groups.yahoo.com/group/creationism/message/66971</guid>
      <description>From: http://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2009/11/091108214924.htm ================================================================ Unsettled Youth: Spitzer</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>The Key to proving the Apparent Age Argument</title>
      <pubDate>Mon, 09 Nov 2009 21:45:51 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>theoferrumii</dc:creator>
      <link>http://groups.yahoo.com/group/creationism/message/66970</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://groups.yahoo.com/group/creationism/message/66970</guid>
      <description>Last night I found the Key to understanding the &quot;Apparent Age&quot; of the Geologic Strata that Creationists have been looking for. It appears that Brown&#39;s Gas has</description>
    </item>

  </channel>
</rss>
<!-- wr2.grp.sp2.yahoo.com uncompressed/chunked Sun Dec 20 10:24:40 PST 2009 -->
