crosstalk2 at Yahoo! Groups

Re: Martin Hengel ist gestorben

John E Staton — Fri, 03 Jul 2009 09:03:02 GMT

I too am sad to hear of Professor Hengel's death. Unfortunately I never had the honour of meeting him in person, but I have greatly valued his writings. RIP

Re: martin hengel ist gestorben

Horace Jeffery Hodges — Thu, 02 Jul 2009 22:46:25 GMT

I took part in Hengel's weekly Friday night seminar for five years (1990-1995) and am very sad to hear of his death. My condolences to his family. Rest in

Re: martin hengel ist gestorben

Jack Kilmon — Thu, 02 Jul 2009 22:40:55 GMT

... From: "Jim West" To: ; Sent: Thursday, July 02, 2009 5:17 PM Subject:

martin hengel ist gestorben

Jim West — Thu, 02 Jul 2009 22:17:50 GMT

Einer der weltweit bedeutendsten Experten für die Literatur des Urchristentums und antiken Judentums, Prof. Martin Hengel, ist am Donnerstag in Tübingen

a survey

Jim West — Tue, 30 Jun 2009 21:00:32 GMT

Sorry to cross post and trouble all of you- but I'm conducting a survey about funding for academic conferences and would be very, very grateful if you could

Re: "Discontinuity"

David Mealand — Sat, 20 Jun 2009 10:12:25 GMT

With regard to some of the items classed as "discontinuous" I am not sure that discontinuity is the best term for analysing the problematic criterion. In its

Re: Discontinuity and Multiple Attestation

E Bruce Brooks — Fri, 19 Jun 2009 13:16:21 GMT

To: Crosstalk Cc: GPG; WSW In Response To: Loren Rossen and Others On: Criteria for HJ From: Bruce I thought there was considerable theoretical interest in

Re: Discontinuity and Multiple Attestation

Loren Rosson — Wed, 17 Jun 2009 22:51:55 GMT

Chris, you wrote that "universal application is hard without an examination of each particular case", and I certainly agree; it should almost go without

Re: Discontinuity and Multiple Attestation

Chris Weimer — Wed, 17 Jun 2009 22:24:32 GMT

Hey Loren, I guess for me I have to partially agree with Jim that universal application is hard without an examination of each particular case. Which is why I

Re: Discontinuity and Multiple Attestation

Loren Rosson — Wed, 17 Jun 2009 19:58:46 GMT

Chris wrote: "Meier is implying that Paul, Gos. John, Epist. Hebrews do not have access to such a tradition about oaths, but Matthew and James do. Since

Re: Discontinuity and Multiple Attestation

Jim West — Wed, 17 Jun 2009 18:54:23 GMT

the criteria that have been bandied about since bultmann (at least) all suffer from the same general flaw: universals never always apply. to set up

Re: Discontinuity and Multiple Attestation

Chris Weimer — Wed, 17 Jun 2009 18:46:28 GMT

Loren, I saw when you wrote this on your blog, and I have to disagree. I don't think "discontinuity" is an especially strong criterion, and I've always been

Discontinuity and Multiple Attestation

Loren Rosson — Wed, 17 Jun 2009 10:26:05 GMT

List -- In A Marginal Jew, Volume 4, John Meier argues that the prohibition against oaths found in Mt 5:34-37 and Jas 5:12 goes back to the historical Jesus.

The background to Galatians

Richard Fellows — Tue, 16 Jun 2009 04:19:20 GMT

The Judean church leaders wrote a letter affirming Gentile liberty (Acts 15:19-29). Paul delivered this letter to the south Galatian churches and

The official (re)launch of gospels.net

Andrew — Fri, 12 Jun 2009 18:39:13 GMT

Hello crosstalk(2) group- I just wanted to announce that I have officially relaunched gospels.net. As many of you know, I've been running this site since the