ct-striker at Yahoo! Groups

Reactive Armor (was Re: Real world Striker design challenge)

Jake — Sat, 21 Nov 2009 19:57:16 GMT

I think you'll have to explain Dan. I would have thought a notional 3dT vehicle would require an additional 2.1t of TL7 composite armour on its front to gain

Re: Reactive Armor (was Re: Real world Striker design challenge)

Kevin Walsh — Sat, 21 Nov 2009 17:48:14 GMT

honestly havent tried yet, was hoping somebody else had already gotten it to work I am coming back to Striker after a very long absence. I was one of the

Reactive Armor (was Re: Real world Striker design challenge)

far_trader_mail — Sat, 21 Nov 2009 17:43:53 GMT

... Side topic if I may. Are you saying you got FF&S, 1st ed, TNE, reactive armor to "work"? I never did as I recall. As in any gain in protection was always

Re: Real world Striker design challenge

Kevin Walsh — Sat, 21 Nov 2009 16:42:18 GMT

thanks Jake, now for my next oddball question... was tinkering with some modern missile data at work overnight first 2 general examples being the Sidewinder

Re: Real world Striker design challenge

Donald McKinney — Sat, 21 Nov 2009 16:42:01 GMT

That's in the Consolidated CT Errata... http://dmckinne.winterwar.org/pdfs/ConsolidatedCTErrata.pdf ... -- __________________________________ "My real e-mail

Re: Real world Striker design challenge

Jake — Sat, 21 Nov 2009 16:35:14 GMT

Here you go... PROPELLANT TABLE Range Weight Multiplier 1 x1 1.5 x1.5 2 x2 2.5 x2.25 3 x2.5 3.5 x2.75 4

Re: Real world Striker design challenge

Kevin Walsh — Fri, 20 Nov 2009 22:03:03 GMT

could somebody post the errata for the missile fuel figures? I cant seem to find the sheet, it was on a little slip sheet with the design tables book, or is it

Re: Real world Striker design challenge

Kevin Walsh — Fri, 20 Nov 2009 21:19:29 GMT

some of the conversions wont be that hard to do, plenty of on and offline sources for things like vehicle weights, horsepower, weapon fits etc... biggest

Re: Real world Striker design challenge

Michael Brown — Fri, 20 Nov 2009 19:57:47 GMT

Why does the cost need to be reasonable? Now the spare parts... Michael Brown mwsaber6@... From: Jake Sent: Friday, November 20, 2009 12:44 PM To:

Re: Real world Striker design challenge

Kevin Walsh — Fri, 20 Nov 2009 19:50:47 GMT

interesting, my specialty is doing real world design terms, although I mostly work with Hero/Champions these days. I will have to dust off Striker _ [Non-text

Real world Striker design challenge

Jake — Fri, 20 Nov 2009 19:47:44 GMT

In the real world, India has just issued a Request for Proposals for 300 light tanks to augment its firepower in mountainous and hilly terrain above 3000m

Boise Idaho Striker?

Jeff Waldeck — Sat, 14 Nov 2009 17:33:15 GMT

Hello, If anyone lives in or near Boise and is interested in platoon/company sized Striker, perhaps combined with a traveller mercenary campaign, contact me

Striker Campaign - San Jose, California

Kristian — Sat, 14 Nov 2009 08:35:05 GMT

HI All, If anyone is interested in joining a Striker campaign in the San Jose, California area contact me off list. The Tactics-0 club is going to play one

Re: Some suggested house rules for CT/Striker

Glenn Ritchie — Fri, 06 Nov 2009 05:17:51 GMT

THANKS!!! I appreciate the responses. -Glenn [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]

Re: Some suggested house rules for CT/Striker

Jake — Thu, 05 Nov 2009 20:40:25 GMT

Glenn, no reason you can't use d12s with the original to-hit numbers if you have them. I just thought more people have d10s. The point is to enable 'parallel