cybalist at Yahoo! Groups

Re: Rozwadowski's Change

dgkilday57 — Fri, 20 Nov 2009 01:59:17 GMT

... At the time-depth in question, would we not expect the first element of such a compound to exhibit the stem-form, as in Alamanni, Alaric, Teutorix, etc.?

Invasion scenarios

Torsten — Thu, 19 Nov 2009 22:18:25 GMT

I didn't know where to cut up this article, so I post it all. The point is to show that the archaeological facts do not contradict a scenario in which Denmark

Re: Rozwadowski's Change

Torsten — Thu, 19 Nov 2009 19:24:45 GMT

... *tout-/tu:t-s-k^ant-/-k^unt- (metathesis in Lith. tukst- ?) in which *tout-/tu:t-s is genitive of *tout-/tu:t- "all; totality" and ka^nt-/k^unt- is my

Re: Bastarnae, bast, IE *bhandh-

Torsten — Thu, 19 Nov 2009 16:14:36 GMT

... I thought that sounded familiar. Jorma Koivulehto THE EARLIEST CONTACTS BETWEEN INDO-EUROPEAN AND URALIC SPEAKERS IN THE LIGHT OF LEXICAL LOANS in Early

Re: Bastarnae, bast, IE *bhandh-

dgkilday57 — Thu, 19 Nov 2009 02:08:36 GMT

... C. C. Uhlenbeck, PBB 22:189 (1897): "... 4. . Auffällig anklingend an got. (urverwant mit lit. , armen. 'stange') ist

Re: Rozwadowski's Change

dgkilday57 — Thu, 19 Nov 2009 02:03:34 GMT

... Clear evidence for a pre-Baltic IE substrate, in my opinion. I have argued elsewhere that the language of Kuhn's Nordwestblock belonged to the

Re: Bastarnae, bast, IE *bhandh-

Torsten — Tue, 17 Nov 2009 07:31:36 GMT

... Aha, interesting. Do you have an URL or a reference on that? Torsten

Re: Bastarnae, bast, IE *bhandh-

dgkilday57 — Tue, 17 Nov 2009 01:38:22 GMT

... Probably from Gothic, possibly through Ossetic intermediacy. If I had my references handy I could cite several examples of such loanwords into Caucasian

The Creationist Agenda of Marius "alexandru_mg3" (was Re: BREAKING N

gknysh — Tue, 17 Nov 2009 00:12:27 GMT

Most satisfactory response. ... ****GK: It's not just Piltdown Man, but no matter. The less said here the better. Carry on.****

Re: The Creationist Agenda of Marius "alexandru_mg3" (was Re: BREAKI

Piotr Gasiorowski — Mon, 16 Nov 2009 21:57:20 GMT

... Neither "evolutionist" nor "creationist" ideas are relevant to Cybalist discussions. As an aside: I'm not sure what you understand by "evolutionist

Re: The Creationist Agenda of Marius "alexandru_mg3" (was Re: BREAKI

george knysh — Mon, 16 Nov 2009 21:44:28 GMT

It would help if Piotr would also declare that cybalist moderators are against evolutionist nonsense as much as against creationist nonsense .There are forms

The Creationist Agenda of Marius "alexandru_mg3" (was Re: BREAKING N

alexandru_mg3 — Mon, 16 Nov 2009 21:42:29 GMT

... OK, BYE! Marius

Re: The Creationist Agenda of Marius "alexandru_mg3" (was Re: BREAKI

Piotr Gasiorowski — Mon, 16 Nov 2009 21:40:01 GMT

... Just like this. Watch my mouth: "It has nothing to do with it". Just like the Big Bang has nothing to do with it, or the origin of life on Earth. ... I

Re: The Posting Style of Marius "alexandru_mg3" (was The Creationist

alexandru_mg3 — Mon, 16 Nov 2009 21:38:29 GMT

... I wonder myself if you can talk about something ? I never see you talking about something here........ Outside a simple ideologistic propaganda similar

The Creationist Agenda of Marius "alexandru_mg3" (was Re: BREAKING N

alexandru_mg3 — Mon, 16 Nov 2009 21:25:53 GMT

... How you can say 'The Origin of the Language' has nothing to do with PIE??????????? ... IS NOT A NON-SENSE --- till you cannot show how LIFE can appear from