<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" ?>
<rss xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>dansguardian at Yahoo! Groups</title>
    <link>http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/dansguardian/</link>
    <description>A public mailing list to discuss all aspects of DansGuardian</description>

    <item>
      <title>[Private Photo Share] Cali Girl- Has sent you private photos.</title>
      <pubDate>Sat, 04 Jul 2009 20:01:24 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>carlicakfriends</dc:creator>
      <link>http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/dansguardian/message/22999</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/dansguardian/message/22999</guid>
      <description>I do not want the entire group seeing these photos.Because some may recognize me. Here&#39;s the link: http://sidekic.zoomshare.com/files/photos.htm Enjoy babe :)</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Google Safe Search</title>
      <pubDate>Sat, 04 Jul 2009 02:47:47 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>Chuck Kollars</dc:creator>
      <link>http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/dansguardian/message/22998</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/dansguardian/message/22998</guid>
      <description>... I&#39;ve had a different experience... 1) Rather than waiting for the results then checking that safe-search was on, a different approach is to go back one</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Dansguardian 2.10 and NTLM authentication</title>
      <pubDate>Fri, 03 Jul 2009 15:01:02 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>Allan Cassaro</dc:creator>
      <link>http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/dansguardian/message/22997</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/dansguardian/message/22997</guid>
      <description>... No. The DansGuardian don&#39;t do any type of authentication (but ident). DG only &quot;sniff&quot; the authentication header. Search the mailing list for more</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: NTLM authentication and transparent proxy</title>
      <pubDate>Fri, 03 Jul 2009 14:58:49 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>Allan Cassaro</dc:creator>
      <link>http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/dansguardian/message/22996</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/dansguardian/message/22996</guid>
      <description>... The answer: No. With transparent proxy you can&#39;t use any type of authentication, read the Readme from &quot;squid&quot; to get more information. Regards.</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Vista , IE 8 and dansguardian</title>
      <pubDate>Fri, 03 Jul 2009 13:08:52 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>karl.bishop61</dc:creator>
      <link>http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/dansguardian/message/22995</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/dansguardian/message/22995</guid>
      <description>Hello Anybody else having trouble viewing pages correctly in internet explorer 8 through dansguardian? some pages do not display correctly , even sites that</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Google Safe Search</title>
      <pubDate>Fri, 03 Jul 2009 11:05:18 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>Cox Michael</dc:creator>
      <link>http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/dansguardian/message/22994</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/dansguardian/message/22994</guid>
      <description>Thanks, that works well. For those interested, you might also want to add: &lt;bing&gt;,&lt;safe search Off&gt; for similar image searches from Bing. Michael ... [Non-text</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Google Safe Search</title>
      <pubDate>Fri, 03 Jul 2009 02:13:01 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>birthcontrol_au</dc:creator>
      <link>http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/dansguardian/message/22993</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/dansguardian/message/22993</guid>
      <description>Hi there We had the same problem with this yesterday. Google web searches were working as expected, however any search attempted in Google images returned the</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Google Safe Search</title>
      <pubDate>Thu, 02 Jul 2009 20:25:44 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>mscoxoh</dc:creator>
      <link>http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/dansguardian/message/22992</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/dansguardian/message/22992</guid>
      <description>Well, Dansguardian does what it&#39;s supposed to, but the problem is that Google now includes a dropdown on their image search page that allows the user to select</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>NTLM authentication and transparent proxy</title>
      <pubDate>Thu, 02 Jul 2009 16:13:02 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>digitpenguin</dc:creator>
      <link>http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/dansguardian/message/22991</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/dansguardian/message/22991</guid>
      <description>Hello, is there a way to enable ntlm authentication (or some other stuff of authentication methods) in conjunction with transparent-proxying? Thank you! </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Google Safe Search</title>
      <pubDate>Thu, 02 Jul 2009 16:06:45 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>Jimmy Varnavides</dc:creator>
      <link>http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/dansguardian/message/22990</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/dansguardian/message/22990</guid>
      <description>I resolved the issue by adding the following to /etc/dansguardian/lists/urlregexplist &quot;(^http://[0-9a-z]+\.google\.[a-z]+[-/%.0-9a-z]*/images\?)(.*)(&amp;?)(safe= </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Google Safe Search</title>
      <pubDate>Thu, 02 Jul 2009 15:02:09 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>kevin creason</dc:creator>
      <link>http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/dansguardian/message/22989</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/dansguardian/message/22989</guid>
      <description>I don&#39;t think I&#39;m following the original poster. It seems like the phrase did exactly what it is supposed to do-- ban a search when the user turns safe-search</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Google Safe Search</title>
      <pubDate>Thu, 02 Jul 2009 14:10:33 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>mscoxoh</dc:creator>
      <link>http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/dansguardian/message/22988</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/dansguardian/message/22988</guid>
      <description>I&#39;m interested in solutions, too. Without safesearch on, Google will return pornography for nearly ANY search word or phrase. Turning it off is not an option.</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Google Safe Search</title>
      <pubDate>Thu, 02 Jul 2009 12:18:38 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>Jimmy Varnavides</dc:creator>
      <link>http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/dansguardian/message/22987</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/dansguardian/message/22987</guid>
      <description>I am having a problem with Google SafeSearch We started getting &#39;Banned combination phrase found&#39; when searching Google images. I looked at the logs and they</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Dansguardian 2.10 and NTLM authentication</title>
      <pubDate>Thu, 02 Jul 2009 10:44:53 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>digitpenguin</dc:creator>
      <link>http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/dansguardian/message/22986</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/dansguardian/message/22986</guid>
      <description>Hello, i would like to know if dansgaurdian 2.10 can fully support 2.10 ntlm auth without the help of squid proxy server. Furthermore, where can i find a</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Weighted phrase.. exception?</title>
      <pubDate>Thu, 02 Jul 2009 02:33:42 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>Mark in Virginia</dc:creator>
      <link>http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/dansguardian/message/22985</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/dansguardian/message/22985</guid>
      <description>I just want to chime in to say I REALLY appreciate this kind of post (which is not uncommon on this list!).  Instead of just &quot;click here, type this&quot;, which</description>
    </item>

  </channel>
</rss>
<!-- wr1.grp.sp2.yahoo.com uncompressed/chunked Sun Jul  5 21:27:02 PDT 2009 -->
