dat-discussions at Yahoo! Groups

Release of Open Source testing tool for uDAPL

Eva Mishra — Thu, 01 Oct 2009 12:18:43 GMT

Hello all, An open source software tool for testing and debugging of user Direct Access Programming Library (uDAPL) has been released. The name of the tool is

Re: ORing of completion flags

Caitlin Bestler — Fri, 12 Sep 2008 21:07:18 GMT

Sorry for the slow response, everyone involved in drafting DAPL now have other projects taking first priority. So we don't' jump on questions as quickly as we

Re: ORing of completion flags

Caitlin Bestler — Fri, 12 Sep 2008 21:04:36 GMT

Sorry for the slow response, everyone involved in drafting DAPL now have other projects taking first priority. So we don't' jump on questions as quickly as we

ORing of completion flags

Eva — Wed, 10 Sep 2008 06:20:23 GMT

hello, Can we interpret through the u-DAPL specification , whether completion flag values that are used at the time of posting can be ORed or not. (i.e. can

Re: Dapl 2 question/issue

Kanevsky, Arkady — Tue, 29 Jan 2008 21:12:37 GMT

No spec issues. Just use "right" library names in dat.conf file. Thanks, Arkady Kanevsky email: arkady@... Network Appliance Inc.

DAT web site had been updated

Kanevsky, Arkady — Wed, 26 Dec 2007 18:35:45 GMT

http://www.datcollaborative.org/implement.html has been updated. Maintenance and Development Linux and

Re: [ofa-general] Re: [PATCH] DAT 2.0 change to include extended eve

James Lentini — Wed, 17 Oct 2007 13:33:36 GMT

... ^ sense :)

Re: [PATCH] DAT 2.0 change to include extended event data with all b

James Lentini — Wed, 17 Oct 2007 13:31:44 GMT

This makes to me.

Re: RFC: DAT 1.2 and 2.0 library build and installation

Xiong, Jianxin — Wed, 26 Sep 2007 04:18:02 GMT

My understanding is that the RFC just allows the coexistence of different libraries but the consumers are still responsible of handling the difference between

Re: RFC: DAT 1.2 and 2.0 library build and installation

Kanevsky, Arkady — Fri, 21 Sep 2007 18:46:55 GMT

Then I do not see any problem with multiple libraries. How do you handle the change of signatures between 1.2 and 2.0 in redirection table? Thanks, Arkady

Re: RFC: DAT 1.2 and 2.0 library build and installation

Davis, Arlin R — Thu, 20 Sep 2007 17:32:18 GMT

I am actually thinking about sticking with one dat.conf. For example, OFED would change to look like the following: # # DAT 1.2 and 2.0 configuration file # #

Re: RFC: DAT 1.2 and 2.0 library build and installation

Kanevsky, Arkady — Tue, 18 Sep 2007 12:50:27 GMT

Arlin, how do two proposed way impact configuration files? Thanks, Arkady Kanevsky email: arkady@... Network Appliance Inc.

Re: RFC: DAT 1.2 and 2.0 library build and installation

Magro, Bill — Mon, 17 Sep 2007 22:24:30 GMT

I think allowing co-existence is very important. Otherwise, commercial software will not be able to gracefully transition from 1.2 to 2.0 over time. --Bill

RFC: DAT 1.2 and 2.0 library build and installation

Davis, Arlin R — Mon, 17 Sep 2007 21:31:26 GMT

I am thinking about allowing coexistence of 1.2 and 2.0 libraries for the next release. This will insure that we continue to support 1.2 providers while new

Re: DAT on Windows - header file location

James Lentini — Fri, 17 Aug 2007 21:00:42 GMT

... I not familiar enough with Windows conventions to give you an answer. Perhaps Arlin or someone on dat-discussions has an opinion. james p.s. In the future,