<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" ?>
<rss xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>descartes at Yahoo! Groups</title>
    <link>http://groups.yahoo.com/group/descartes/</link>
    <description>Descartes: Slow readings &amp; discussion</description>

    <item>
      <title>Re: Indisputable facts about the mind</title>
      <pubDate>Sat, 14 Feb 2009 20:05:27 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>Joseph Polanik</dc:creator>
      <link>http://groups.yahoo.com/group/descartes/message/687</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://groups.yahoo.com/group/descartes/message/687</guid>
      <description>Contingent A Priori ... in some sense a contingent a priori is similar to a forensic inference. this is a form of logic in which one begins from a fact and</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Restatement of the Central Argument</title>
      <pubDate>Sat, 31 Jan 2009 15:49:07 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>Joseph Polanik</dc:creator>
      <link>http://groups.yahoo.com/group/descartes/message/686</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://groups.yahoo.com/group/descartes/message/686</guid>
      <description>Restatement of the Central Argument ... [Joe]: nor did I say they were. I said that you first admitted being aware of them in your last post. after months of</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>(no subject)</title>
      <pubDate>Sun, 18 Jan 2009 20:16:27 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>Joseph Polanik</dc:creator>
      <link>http://groups.yahoo.com/group/descartes/message/685</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://groups.yahoo.com/group/descartes/message/685</guid>
      <description>I been revising my website and I&#39;ve added a page that focuses exclusively on defining &#39;am&#39; and discuss its use: http://what-am-i.net/alpi_am_definition.htm </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>descartes 2nd meditation pascal 33</title>
      <pubDate>Tue, 02 Dec 2008 06:58:55 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>danasamsone</dc:creator>
      <link>http://groups.yahoo.com/group/descartes/message/684</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://groups.yahoo.com/group/descartes/message/684</guid>
      <description>hello! is anyone aware of what the connection between Pascal&#39;s Pensees 33 and the second Meditation? Pascal 33 &#39;&#39;Poetical beauty.--As we speak of poetical</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: What am I? What is a Human?</title>
      <pubDate>Sun, 23 Nov 2008 14:46:41 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>Joseph Polanik</dc:creator>
      <link>http://groups.yahoo.com/group/descartes/message/683</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://groups.yahoo.com/group/descartes/message/683</guid>
      <description>[Joe]: however, in any inquiry into the structure of the human individual, it is woefully inadequate because it has not yet been established that the human is</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: The Uses of &#39;Is&#39; are not Quantifiers</title>
      <pubDate>Sat, 22 Nov 2008 15:04:33 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>Joseph Polanik</dc:creator>
      <link>http://groups.yahoo.com/group/descartes/message/682</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://groups.yahoo.com/group/descartes/message/682</guid>
      <description>... [Joe (new)]: in some cases, perhaps most cases, that might be close enough for conversational use; after all, it worked for Lord Greystoke. however, in any</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Self-Asserted Self-Awareness is Self-Verifying</title>
      <pubDate>Wed, 19 Nov 2008 11:20:47 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>Joseph Polanik</dc:creator>
      <link>http://groups.yahoo.com/group/descartes/message/681</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://groups.yahoo.com/group/descartes/message/681</guid>
      <description>[Joe]: I am the referent of &#39;I&#39; whenever I say &quot;I am&quot;. hence, I am self-aware. since nothing unreal is self-aware, it follows that I am real (in some sense). </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>The Forensic Inference within the Experientio</title>
      <pubDate>Fri, 14 Nov 2008 12:10:46 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>Joseph Polanik</dc:creator>
      <link>http://groups.yahoo.com/group/descartes/message/680</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://groups.yahoo.com/group/descartes/message/680</guid>
      <description>... it is a wise move to logically separate the initial Cogito argument from Descartes&#39; ultimate conclusion that he is a soul that would continue to exist even</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>The Ambiguity as to the Referent of &#39;I&#39;</title>
      <pubDate>Fri, 14 Nov 2008 12:07:12 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>Joseph Polanik</dc:creator>
      <link>http://groups.yahoo.com/group/descartes/message/679</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://groups.yahoo.com/group/descartes/message/679</guid>
      <description>[Joe]: however, it sounds like you have redefined &#39;universal quantifier&#39;. a statement like &#39;I am&#39; is more like an existentially quantified statement;</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Is Kant&#39;s Case against the Cogito Valid?</title>
      <pubDate>Fri, 14 Nov 2008 01:47:16 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>Joseph Polanik</dc:creator>
      <link>http://groups.yahoo.com/group/descartes/message/678</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://groups.yahoo.com/group/descartes/message/678</guid>
      <description>it does not matter whether experience is or is not justified as knowledge. it is enough that I experience; and, draw the obvious conclusion --- I have to be in</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: [kant] Is Kant&#39;s Case against the Cogito Valid?</title>
      <pubDate>Thu, 13 Nov 2008 11:42:17 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>Joseph Polanik</dc:creator>
      <link>http://groups.yahoo.com/group/descartes/message/677</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://groups.yahoo.com/group/descartes/message/677</guid>
      <description>Omar, as long as the Experiento is a true statement, I&#39;m not sure it matters how it is classified according to the scheme that Kant used (synthetic/analytic, a</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: [kant] Is Kant&#39;s Case against the Cogito Valid?</title>
      <pubDate>Mon, 10 Nov 2008 11:48:54 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>Joseph Polanik</dc:creator>
      <link>http://groups.yahoo.com/group/descartes/message/676</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://groups.yahoo.com/group/descartes/message/676</guid>
      <description>... Descartes denied that he acquired his knowledge this way; but, since he stated it in the _Principles of Philosophy_ which he intended to be used as a</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Descartes,	Heidegger and Augustine ... and Kant</title>
      <pubDate>Mon, 10 Nov 2008 11:02:53 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>Joseph Polanik</dc:creator>
      <link>http://groups.yahoo.com/group/descartes/message/675</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://groups.yahoo.com/group/descartes/message/675</guid>
      <description>... [Joe (new)]: I could not generate that statement for you to hear/read unless my body was alive; but, it is not yet proven that I am identical to my body;</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Descartes, Heidegger and Augustine ... and, Kant</title>
      <pubDate>Sun, 09 Nov 2008 13:32:05 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>Joseph Polanik</dc:creator>
      <link>http://groups.yahoo.com/group/descartes/message/674</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://groups.yahoo.com/group/descartes/message/674</guid>
      <description>... yes. &#39;I allege that I am alive; therefore, I am alive&#39; is a self-verifying performative argument. the fact that I can make the self-referencing allegation</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: [MoFPP:  139] Re: Is Kant&#39;s Case against the Cogito Valid?</title>
      <pubDate>Sun, 09 Nov 2008 12:38:52 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>Joseph Polanik</dc:creator>
      <link>http://groups.yahoo.com/group/descartes/message/673</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://groups.yahoo.com/group/descartes/message/673</guid>
      <description>... for reasons that remain obscure, some philosophers *do* get the idea that &#39;I am experiencing; therefore, I am&#39; means that experiencing causes or produces</description>
    </item>

  </channel>
</rss>
<!-- wr1.grp.sp2.yahoo.com uncompressed/chunked Fri Jul 10 16:19:51 PDT 2009 -->
