<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" ?>
<rss xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>dfwscan at Yahoo! Groups</title>
    <link>http://groups.yahoo.com/group/dfwscan/</link>
    <description>Scanner Radio Discussion for DFW, TX</description>

    <item>
      <title>Parker FD Training,</title>
      <pubDate>Wed, 06 Jan 2010 01:48:23 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>ke5vxs</dc:creator>
      <link>http://groups.yahoo.com/group/dfwscan/message/31322</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://groups.yahoo.com/group/dfwscan/message/31322</guid>
      <description>Parker Fire Dept is training on there channel 2.</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Parker FD Training,</title>
      <pubDate>Wed, 06 Jan 2010 01:48:11 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>ke5vxs</dc:creator>
      <link>http://groups.yahoo.com/group/dfwscan/message/31321</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://groups.yahoo.com/group/dfwscan/message/31321</guid>
      <description>Parker Fire Dept is training on there channel 2.</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: USMS new digital?</title>
      <pubDate>Tue, 05 Jan 2010 18:00:34 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>Blaine Brooks</dc:creator>
      <link>http://groups.yahoo.com/group/dfwscan/message/31320</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://groups.yahoo.com/group/dfwscan/message/31320</guid>
      <description>... Thanks Bill. A guy down in San Antonio has also confirmed this being used by USMS with a NAC of 293.</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>USMS new digital?</title>
      <pubDate>Tue, 05 Jan 2010 17:50:35 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>Bill</dc:creator>
      <link>http://groups.yahoo.com/group/dfwscan/message/31319</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://groups.yahoo.com/group/dfwscan/message/31319</guid>
      <description>Blaine, from my notes and travels this one has been captured as: US Marshals for the Court Security Officers [CSO] Kansas City MO reports of 127.3 and P25 </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>USMS new digital?</title>
      <pubDate>Tue, 05 Jan 2010 17:20:06 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>Blaine Brooks</dc:creator>
      <link>http://groups.yahoo.com/group/dfwscan/message/31318</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://groups.yahoo.com/group/dfwscan/message/31318</guid>
      <description>Captured a new (at least to ME) P25 frequency yesterday.... 170.800 NAC 293....some surveillance in the clear, but mostly encrypted... I&#39;m pretty sure it&#39;s</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Celina fire</title>
      <pubDate>Tue, 05 Jan 2010 05:54:27 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>Blaine Brooks</dc:creator>
      <link>http://groups.yahoo.com/group/dfwscan/message/31317</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://groups.yahoo.com/group/dfwscan/message/31317</guid>
      <description>Just turned on scanner, and caught Celina FD with a working fire. Interior units sound like they now have it under control. Never got an address or better</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Good comparison chart</title>
      <pubDate>Tue, 05 Jan 2010 05:36:47 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>Brian</dc:creator>
      <link>http://groups.yahoo.com/group/dfwscan/message/31316</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://groups.yahoo.com/group/dfwscan/message/31316</guid>
      <description>Interesting Paul...I did not know this.  I was thinking the cellular analog to digital switch was (in a way) like the mandated digital TV switch.  As I </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Good comparison chart</title>
      <pubDate>Tue, 05 Jan 2010 03:51:59 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>hiegtx</dc:creator>
      <link>http://groups.yahoo.com/group/dfwscan/message/31315</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://groups.yahoo.com/group/dfwscan/message/31315</guid>
      <description>Don&#39;t forget the scanner comparison chart on &quot;Mark&#39;s Scanners&quot; (home of the &#39;easier to read manual pages) </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Six Flags Over Texas Freqs</title>
      <pubDate>Tue, 05 Jan 2010 03:19:55 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>Gary Persons</dc:creator>
      <link>http://groups.yahoo.com/group/dfwscan/message/31314</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://groups.yahoo.com/group/dfwscan/message/31314</guid>
      <description>They must have change numbers in the past 5 years.</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Not paying attention...</title>
      <pubDate>Mon, 04 Jan 2010 21:38:48 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>Andrew Tucker</dc:creator>
      <link>http://groups.yahoo.com/group/dfwscan/message/31313</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://groups.yahoo.com/group/dfwscan/message/31313</guid>
      <description>A guy in my fire academy class did that at one of our live burns, we were lucky someone didnt get killed. What our hose did was stand up vertically in the bed</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Not paying attention...</title>
      <pubDate>Mon, 04 Jan 2010 21:12:14 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>ke5vxs</dc:creator>
      <link>http://groups.yahoo.com/group/dfwscan/message/31312</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://groups.yahoo.com/group/dfwscan/message/31312</guid>
      <description>My dept got dispatched to a Mutual aid structure fire the other night. The structure was at lest 1000 ft off the roadway. So the first in engine layed in and</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Good comparison chart</title>
      <pubDate>Mon, 04 Jan 2010 20:00:21 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>Blaine Brooks</dc:creator>
      <link>http://groups.yahoo.com/group/dfwscan/message/31311</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://groups.yahoo.com/group/dfwscan/message/31311</guid>
      <description>... Thank arrogant &quot;well, quite frankly&quot; Newt Gingrich and his cronies for a lot of that BS, and the idiots that were heading up the FCC and ECPA at the time. </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Good comparison chart</title>
      <pubDate>Mon, 04 Jan 2010 19:37:01 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>Paul Opitz</dc:creator>
      <link>http://groups.yahoo.com/group/dfwscan/message/31310</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://groups.yahoo.com/group/dfwscan/message/31310</guid>
      <description>Actually, in some areas of the country (primarily rural served by small providers) analog cellular in those bands is still alive. The FCC just stopped</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Good comparison chart</title>
      <pubDate>Mon, 04 Jan 2010 19:30:17 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>Brian</dc:creator>
      <link>http://groups.yahoo.com/group/dfwscan/message/31309</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://groups.yahoo.com/group/dfwscan/message/31309</guid>
      <description>This site brings up a question I&#39;ve wondered about for a while now.  Why is the cellular (824 - 849 &amp; 869 - 894 MHz) band still blocked since there is no more</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Good comparison chart</title>
      <pubDate>Mon, 04 Jan 2010 17:32:26 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>Michael Cameron</dc:creator>
      <link>http://groups.yahoo.com/group/dfwscan/message/31308</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://groups.yahoo.com/group/dfwscan/message/31308</guid>
      <description>I would add that the new RS PRO-107 (made by GRE) is a paradigm shift in scanners. First we went from crystal controlled scanners (remember buying crystals for</description>
    </item>

  </channel>
</rss>
<!-- wr2.grp.sp2.yahoo.com uncompressed/chunked Fri Feb 12 18:05:44 PST 2010 -->
