digitalphysics at Yahoo! Groups

Re: Fwd: Displeased with Chalmers's comments on digital physics

theophanes raptis — Fri, 25 Sep 2009 01:52:16 GMT

Dear Eray Although I tend to agree with your opinion about dualism on very general grounds, I cannot on the other hand avoid a bit of skepticism on the

Re: Fwd: Displeased with Chalmers's comments on digital physics

Eray Ozkural — Wed, 23 Sep 2009 07:05:48 GMT

Hello there, I see where you are coming from, but I would like to make the following comment. If the universe is a cellular automaton, then you and everything

Re: Fwd: Displeased with Chalmers's comments on digital physics

theophanes raptis — Wed, 23 Sep 2009 00:33:41 GMT

Hello everyone This is becominga very interesting discussion indeed. First of all because even if one wanted to dismiss of dualism it seems that he is

Re: Fwd: Displeased with Chalmers's comments on digital physics

Eray Ozkural — Sun, 20 Sep 2009 22:14:37 GMT

I don't see how your point 1. applies. I wrote in response to Rick's claim that in (the actual application of!) information theory the message exists as

Re: Fwd: Displeased with Chalmers's comments on digital physics

Carl Rehnberg — Sun, 20 Sep 2009 20:37:32 GMT

Hello! A couple of points here. 1. We are not here talking about a platonian "world of ideas", we are talking about a hypothetized substrate existing under

Re: Fwd: Displeased with Chalmers's comments on digital physics

Eray Ozkural — Sat, 19 Sep 2009 19:45:45 GMT

I will send3 your greetings to Dr. Akman, he is the head of our philosophy department now and I think he was one of the best teachers I have ever had. I think

Re: Fwd: Displeased with Chalmers's comments on digital physics

Rick Padua — Sun, 13 Sep 2009 12:45:47 GMT

Say "Hi" to Varol Akman. He may often be half-baked be he's still an asset. Putting Chalmers aside as unnecessary, you need to explain why we perceive

Fwd: Displeased with Chalmers's comments on digital physics

Eray Ozkural — Sat, 12 Sep 2009 12:45:19 GMT

... From: Eray Ozkural Date: Sat, Sep 12, 2009 at 3:32 PM Subject: Displeased with Chalmers's comments on digital physics To:

Workshop in Pisa - JOUAL - 'Just One Universal Algorithm'

Fiume Quadrifoglio — Wed, 25 Mar 2009 23:05:37 GMT

Hi everybody, I believe this event might be of interest to some members of the Digital Physics community: http://fmt.isti.cnr.it/JOUAL2009/ JOUAL stands for

He is onto us

Tim Boykett — Mon, 17 Nov 2008 16:05:33 GMT

http://www.xkcd.com/

Re: List of known minimal CA?

hendy@... — Mon, 13 Oct 2008 20:13:56 GMT

An example of Blogger custom domain is my own, www.rainbowpurple.com I also use Google Apps with it for email, XMPP, etc. ... - original message - Subject: Re:

Re: List of known minimal CA?

Carl Lumma — Mon, 13 Oct 2008 02:55:14 GMT

... If you still have the old content, may I suggest putting it back up? Hosting is cheap (e.g. dreamhost.com), and there are still links out there to your

Re: List of known minimal CA?

Joel Dobrzelewski — Sun, 12 Oct 2008 12:52:52 GMT

Hi Carl! It's true - digitalphysics.org, while not dead, is perhaps sleeping!? (We still own the domain name, but have let the hosting account expire for

List of known minimal CA?

Carl Lumma — Thu, 09 Oct 2008 00:32:26 GMT

Greetings all! Are Joel and Plamen still around these parts? digitalphysics.org has been down for some time. I'm interested in getting a list of all the known

Course

Carl Rehnberg — Fri, 25 Apr 2008 21:19:40 GMT

Hello everyone! I am sitting here preparing a series of lectures in simulation theory that some of my students have asked for and discovered that my computer