<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" ?>
<rss xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>dkim-testers at Yahoo! Groups</title>
    <link>http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/dkim-testers/</link>
    <description>DKIM Testers</description>

    <item>
      <title>Re: DKIM problem</title>
      <pubDate>Fri, 06 Nov 2009 16:24:53 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>Jason Long</dc:creator>
      <link>http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/dkim-testers/message/59</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/dkim-testers/message/59</guid>
      <description>... The above line defines a record at dkim1.gnvfc.net. You want it to be at dkim1._domainkey.gnvfc.net. So change the &quot;dkim1&quot; above to &quot;dkim1._domainkey&quot;. </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: DKIM problem</title>
      <pubDate>Fri, 06 Nov 2009 14:14:22 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>anil.aliyan</dc:creator>
      <link>http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/dkim-testers/message/58</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/dkim-testers/message/58</guid>
      <description>Hii, I have dns entries as given below: _domainkey.gnvfc.net.         IN      TXT     &quot;t=y; o=-&quot; dkim1   IN      TXT     &quot;k=rsa;</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: DKIM problem</title>
      <pubDate>Thu, 05 Nov 2009 15:23:05 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>Jason Long</dc:creator>
      <link>http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/dkim-testers/message/57</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/dkim-testers/message/57</guid>
      <description>... That&#39;s your DKIM signature. It has s=dkim1 d=gnvfc.net Therefore, there should be a DNS (TXT) record at dkim1._domainkey.gnvfc.net There is not. That is</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: DKIM problem</title>
      <pubDate>Thu, 05 Nov 2009 14:51:05 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>Fatih Piristine</dc:creator>
      <link>http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/dkim-testers/message/56</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/dkim-testers/message/56</guid>
      <description>Try to set header method and body method to simple, signing algorithm to sha-256 Then  check your ns servers, does it return the same domain name when you ping</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: DKIM problem</title>
      <pubDate>Thu, 05 Nov 2009 10:36:36 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>anil.aliyan</dc:creator>
      <link>http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/dkim-testers/message/55</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/dkim-testers/message/55</guid>
      <description>Yes i have defined the selector in qmail. Acutally I am using qmailtoaster provided by qmailtoaster.org and i am using DKIM package provided by them. I can</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: DKIM problem</title>
      <pubDate>Wed, 04 Nov 2009 11:18:42 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>Fatih Piristine</dc:creator>
      <link>http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/dkim-testers/message/54</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/dkim-testers/message/54</guid>
      <description>Did you define selector in qmail for the domain? Fatih From: dkim-testers@yahoogroups.com [mailto:dkim-testers@yahoogroups.com] On Behalf Of anil.aliyan Sent:</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>DKIM problem</title>
      <pubDate>Wed, 04 Nov 2009 07:31:38 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>anil.aliyan</dc:creator>
      <link>http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/dkim-testers/message/53</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/dkim-testers/message/53</guid>
      <description>Hii I am new here and i am looking for a solution for may DKIM related problem. I have qmail server runing and i have configured DKIM to sign all outgoing</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: dkim problems with yahoo</title>
      <pubDate>Fri, 15 May 2009 21:22:20 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>Jesse Thompson</dc:creator>
      <link>http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/dkim-testers/message/52</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/dkim-testers/message/52</guid>
      <description>... It&#39;s also worth noting that the Authentication-Results header added by Gmail, for a message sent from my Yahoo account to my Gmail account, said this: </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: dkim problems with yahoo</title>
      <pubDate>Fri, 15 May 2009 21:14:37 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>Jesse Thompson</dc:creator>
      <link>http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/dkim-testers/message/51</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/dkim-testers/message/51</guid>
      <description>... I sent 6 messages from my Yahoo account to test@....  3 came back pass and 3 came back fail. dkim-test@...: fail </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: dkim problems with yahoo</title>
      <pubDate>Fri, 15 May 2009 20:50:08 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>Jim Fenton</dc:creator>
      <link>http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/dkim-testers/message/50</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/dkim-testers/message/50</guid>
      <description>... We&#39;re seeing valid signatures from Yahoo! and Facebook (actually facebookmail.com). ... What do you mean by &quot;inverse results&quot;?  It sounds like the test</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>dkim problems with yahoo</title>
      <pubDate>Fri, 15 May 2009 20:46:32 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>Jesse Thompson</dc:creator>
      <link>http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/dkim-testers/message/49</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/dkim-testers/message/49</guid>
      <description>I notice that all signatures from Yahoo and Facebook are failing, and mostly succeeding for other domains, including Gmail and Paypal.  Not that I care that</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>DKIM Test</title>
      <pubDate>Fri, 03 Apr 2009 08:15:18 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>Itsupport</dc:creator>
      <link>http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/dkim-testers/message/48</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/dkim-testers/message/48</guid>
      <description>Test</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Mail reflector at testing.dkim.org</title>
      <pubDate>Mon, 02 Mar 2009 03:55:21 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>Dave CROCKER</dc:creator>
      <link>http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/dkim-testers/message/47</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/dkim-testers/message/47</guid>
      <description>... Jim, Yeah, I missed that.  Sorry. I think my confusion came from the top of: &lt;http://testing.dkim.org/&gt; ... which seemed like it must still be running. d/ </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Mail reflector at testing.dkim.org</title>
      <pubDate>Fri, 27 Feb 2009 22:16:13 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>Jim Fenton</dc:creator>
      <link>http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/dkim-testers/message/46</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/dkim-testers/message/46</guid>
      <description>Yes, I updated http://testing.dkim.org/reflector.html at the time I turned off the reflector. I&#39;m going to poll a couple of the other reflector operators to</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Mail reflector at testing.dkim.org</title>
      <pubDate>Fri, 27 Feb 2009 18:56:15 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>Dave CROCKER</dc:creator>
      <link>http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/dkim-testers/message/45</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/dkim-testers/message/45</guid>
      <description>bummer. will you be updating &lt;http://testing.dkim.org/&gt; to indicate that the reflector is now disabled? d/ ... -- Dave Crocker Brandenburg InternetWorking </description>
    </item>

  </channel>
</rss>
<!-- wr1.grp.sp2.yahoo.com uncompressed/chunked Mon Nov  9 13:22:13 PST 2009 -->
