<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" ?>
<rss xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>dmalloc at Yahoo! Groups</title>
    <link>http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/dmalloc/</link>
    <description>Debug Malloc Library (dmalloc) Group</description>

    <item>
      <title>RELEASE 5.3.0</title>
      <pubDate>Wed, 28 Jan 2004 15:27:12 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>Gray Watson</dc:creator>
      <link>http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/dmalloc/message/529</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/dmalloc/message/529</guid>
      <description>[ This message has been posted at the new Dmalloc forums. Please visit the following URL to see the discussion. http://dmalloc.com/forums/topic_show.pl?tid=40</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>dmalloc vs dlopen &amp; strdup vs fopen </title>
      <pubDate>Tue, 11 Nov 2003 15:13:56 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>Srikumar</dc:creator>
      <link>http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/dmalloc/message/527</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/dmalloc/message/527</guid>
      <description>[ This message has been posted at the new Dmalloc forums.  Please visit the following URL and/or subscribe to the forum to see the discussion.</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>RELEASE: 5.2.3</title>
      <pubDate>Tue, 30 Sep 2003 00:17:24 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>graywatson</dc:creator>
      <link>http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/dmalloc/message/526</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/dmalloc/message/526</guid>
      <description>[ Original post on http://dmalloc.com/forums/topic_show.pl?tid=8 ] Bug fix release up on the download sites.  Added some better handling for Cygwin</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>MOVING to forums on dmalloc.com</title>
      <pubDate>Mon, 29 Sep 2003 22:28:41 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>graywatson</dc:creator>
      <link>http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/dmalloc/message/525</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/dmalloc/message/525</guid>
      <description>Howdy: So I have [finally] started the process of migrating off of Yahoo groups.  When I started using egroups, they were lightweight and full featured.  The</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>glibc internal malloc issues</title>
      <pubDate>Sun, 28 Sep 2003 02:46:43 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>Danny Sung</dc:creator>
      <link>http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/dmalloc/message/524</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/dmalloc/message/524</guid>
      <description>I&#39;ve noticed that dmalloc will be able to report mallocs made by internal glibc functions.  (In particular, calls like setprotoent()). glibc does free them, as</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: dmalloc_argv on Win98</title>
      <pubDate>Mon, 08 Sep 2003 19:41:50 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>Gray Watson</dc:creator>
      <link>http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/dmalloc/message/523</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/dmalloc/message/523</guid>
      <description>... Good one.  Stupid of me.  Fixed in the mainline.  I just replaced all instances of environ in process_env (dmalloc_argv.c:2896) to env_val. ... Well it</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Usage on MIPS , Power PC architecture</title>
      <pubDate>Mon, 08 Sep 2003 18:02:15 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>Scott Michel</dc:creator>
      <link>http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/dmalloc/message/522</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/dmalloc/message/522</guid>
      <description>dmalloc is pretty portable and architecture neutral. You might have a problem or two with overriding the libc versions of malloc (not very likely, but could</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: dmalloc under cygwin</title>
      <pubDate>Mon, 08 Sep 2003 17:59:50 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>Dan Nelson</dc:creator>
      <link>http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/dmalloc/message/521</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/dmalloc/message/521</guid>
      <description>... Could this be done automatically via a constructor?  i.e. in libdmalloc, have this: #if defined(GETENV_CALLS_MALLOC) static void dmalloc_init()</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>RELEASE: 5.2.2</title>
      <pubDate>Mon, 08 Sep 2003 16:09:37 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>Gray Watson</dc:creator>
      <link>http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/dmalloc/message/520</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/dmalloc/message/520</guid>
      <description>Howdy: Bug fix release up on the download sites.  The big fix is a resolution (hopefully) to the function argument checking.  Please let me know ASAP if you</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: dmalloc 5.2.1: Bug in _dmalloc_chunk_pnt_check()</title>
      <pubDate>Mon, 08 Sep 2003 16:02:14 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>Gray Watson</dc:creator>
      <link>http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/dmalloc/message/519</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/dmalloc/message/519</guid>
      <description>[ First off, after putting up with spam for a while, I&#39;ve turned the dmalloc list into a moderated one.  Unfortunately, pending messages were stuck in the</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>dmalloc under cygwin</title>
      <pubDate>Mon, 08 Sep 2003 13:26:44 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>Gray Watson</dc:creator>
      <link>http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/dmalloc/message/518</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/dmalloc/message/518</guid>
      <description>Hey: So there&#39;s been a long standing problem with using dmalloc under cygwin because of the use of getenv in malloc().  As far as I have been told, cygwin goes</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>dmalloc_argv on Win98</title>
      <pubDate>Mon, 08 Sep 2003 13:26:41 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>Brian Schreder</dc:creator>
      <link>http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/dmalloc/message/517</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/dmalloc/message/517</guid>
      <description>I&#39;m trying to compile dmalloc_argv on Windows 98 using the makefile provided with dmalloc 5.2.1 and I&#39;m getting error &quot;error: conflicting types for</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Segfault in 5.2.1</title>
      <pubDate>Mon, 08 Sep 2003 13:26:26 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>james_dancebee</dc:creator>
      <link>http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/dmalloc/message/516</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/dmalloc/message/516</guid>
      <description>I&#39;m having trouble getting dmalloc to work on Gentoo linux.  When I run a program statically linked with dmallocth, I get an immediate segfault at malloc.c:983</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Usage on MIPS , Power PC architecture</title>
      <pubDate>Mon, 08 Sep 2003 13:25:55 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>Girish Kale</dc:creator>
      <link>http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/dmalloc/message/515</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/dmalloc/message/515</guid>
      <description>Hi, We are developing an embedded system based on MIPS,PowerPc,SiByte, architecture. Can I use dmalloc for these architectures? Thanks, Girish</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>dmalloc 5.2.1: Bug in _dmalloc_chunk_pnt_check()</title>
      <pubDate>Mon, 08 Sep 2003 13:25:54 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>typerlc</dc:creator>
      <link>http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/dmalloc/message/514</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/dmalloc/message/514</guid>
      <description>I think there is a bug in _dmalloc_chunk_pnt_check that causes false positives to be raised by dmalloc. If debugging is set high enough, then</description>
    </item>

  </channel>
</rss>
<!-- wr1.grp.sp2.yahoo.com uncompressed/chunked Fri Jul 10 00:12:43 PDT 2009 -->
