<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" ?>
<rss xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>domaindrivendesign at Yahoo! Groups</title>
    <link>http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/domaindrivendesign/</link>
    <description>Domain-Driven Design</description>

    <item>
      <title>Re: How to pass reference to Entity or AR?</title>
      <pubDate>Fri, 20 Nov 2009 23:52:56 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>Mark Nijhof</dc:creator>
      <link>http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/domaindrivendesign/message/16394</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/domaindrivendesign/message/16394</guid>
      <description>Oh I just realize I may have misunderstood the original question. I my CQRS example client and account are two different Aggregate Roots, and between two AR&#39;s</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: How to pass reference to Entity or AR?</title>
      <pubDate>Fri, 20 Nov 2009 23:40:49 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>Mike Chaliy</dc:creator>
      <link>http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/domaindrivendesign/message/16393</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/domaindrivendesign/message/16393</guid>
      <description>Thank you for your opinion. I get it. So for you semantics of this methods are equivalent? They both means passing reference to the product? By the way, in</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: How to pass reference to Entity or AR?</title>
      <pubDate>Fri, 20 Nov 2009 23:25:32 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>Mark Nijhof</dc:creator>
      <link>http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/domaindrivendesign/message/16392</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/domaindrivendesign/message/16392</guid>
      <description>Hi Mike, Ok to literally answer your question :) if you already hold a reference to the entity then pass that in, if all you have is the Id and you are not </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: How to pass reference to Entity or AR?</title>
      <pubDate>Fri, 20 Nov 2009 21:42:36 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>Mike Chaliy</dc:creator>
      <link>http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/domaindrivendesign/message/16391</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/domaindrivendesign/message/16391</guid>
      <description>Mark, could you elaborate on this? Really I cannot understand your statement. My problem is just passing reference of the entity to the service. Nothing more. </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: How to pass reference to Entity or AR?</title>
      <pubDate>Fri, 20 Nov 2009 21:07:07 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>Mark Nijhof</dc:creator>
      <link>http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/domaindrivendesign/message/16390</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/domaindrivendesign/message/16390</guid>
      <description>Pull most of the behavior inside the domain and use double dispatch to inject the service in the domain. -Mark</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>How to pass reference to Entity or AR?</title>
      <pubDate>Fri, 20 Nov 2009 21:00:01 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>Mike Chaliy</dc:creator>
      <link>http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/domaindrivendesign/message/16389</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/domaindrivendesign/message/16389</guid>
      <description>I have entity Product. And I have domain service: class FooService { public void DoSomething(Product prod); } When calling DoSomething I can pass object so I</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: data driven application</title>
      <pubDate>Fri, 20 Nov 2009 18:59:35 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>Justin Daubenmire</dc:creator>
      <link>http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/domaindrivendesign/message/16388</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/domaindrivendesign/message/16388</guid>
      <description>... From: Matt Burton procs in event handlers, then for reads you can use AutoMapper to map IDataReader / IDataRecord to object types for you. ... Can you</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: data driven application</title>
      <pubDate>Fri, 20 Nov 2009 18:55:37 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>Matt Burton</dc:creator>
      <link>http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/domaindrivendesign/message/16387</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/domaindrivendesign/message/16387</guid>
      <description>T4 templates in Visual Studio 2008. The procs follow a convention so our generated code layer is actually generating mapping classes as well, so result sets</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: data driven application</title>
      <pubDate>Fri, 20 Nov 2009 18:49:09 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>Justin Daubenmire</dc:creator>
      <link>http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/domaindrivendesign/message/16386</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/domaindrivendesign/message/16386</guid>
      <description>what do you use for code generation? Also, what do you use to map returned data from a stored procedure to your domain entities and value objects? thanks. </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>DDD and API</title>
      <pubDate>Fri, 20 Nov 2009 18:48:23 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>paulo_trecenti</dc:creator>
      <link>http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/domaindrivendesign/message/16385</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/domaindrivendesign/message/16385</guid>
      <description>I want now wath&#39;s the relashion ship between DDD and API. In Eric Evans book&#39;s and in hi&#39;s infoQ presentations, he talk about the essentialy or a &quot;dream&quot; of</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: data driven application</title>
      <pubDate>Fri, 20 Nov 2009 18:43:58 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>Matt Burton</dc:creator>
      <link>http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/domaindrivendesign/message/16384</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/domaindrivendesign/message/16384</guid>
      <description>We&#39;re 100% stored procedures, and I codegen the heck out of everything when it comes to interacting with them. I&#39;ve automated it to the point where we don&#39;t</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>data driven application</title>
      <pubDate>Fri, 20 Nov 2009 17:48:55 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>Justin Daubenmire</dc:creator>
      <link>http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/domaindrivendesign/message/16383</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/domaindrivendesign/message/16383</guid>
      <description>Guys, Sorry for the slightly off topic post but I wanted to ask for some input from everyone. I am working on a project that uses 100% stored procedures. In</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: IoC Containers and Domain Driven Design</title>
      <pubDate>Fri, 20 Nov 2009 16:59:54 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>Nuno Lopes</dc:creator>
      <link>http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/domaindrivendesign/message/16382</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/domaindrivendesign/message/16382</guid>
      <description>Hi Jeremie, Entities (a type of domain objects) are not about state management IMHO. They are about representation, function, behavior, capability, </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: A possible solution for uniqueness validation in CQS</title>
      <pubDate>Fri, 20 Nov 2009 15:54:02 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>Nuno Lopes</dc:creator>
      <link>http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/domaindrivendesign/message/16381</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/domaindrivendesign/message/16381</guid>
      <description>... Hi Jer, The use of lookup keys is an implementation detail (or Indexes) of for instance the Repository. Is like your event replay to reconstruct the AR, it</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: A possible solution for uniqueness validation in CQS</title>
      <pubDate>Fri, 20 Nov 2009 11:30:36 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>J??r??mie</dc:creator>
      <link>http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/domaindrivendesign/message/16380</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/domaindrivendesign/message/16380</guid>
      <description>Yes, but this kind of uniqueness is usually bound to lookup key uniqueness. Those lookup keys are never used in the domain itself. They are used to find</description>
    </item>

  </channel>
</rss>
<!-- wr2.grp.sp2.yahoo.com uncompressed/chunked Thu Dec 17 03:21:46 PST 2009 -->
