http://groups.yahoo.com/group/douglasgordonDNA/ Douglas - Gordon DNA project Sun, 04 Feb 2007 22:18:56 GMT Beryl Turner http://groups.yahoo.com/group/douglasgordonDNA/message/74 http://groups.yahoo.com/group/douglasgordonDNA/message/74 Some of you might be interested in this link http://pub32.bravenet.com/forum/show.php?usernum=2687235007&msgid=499095 The owner of this site has been Sun, 04 Feb 2007 20:26:02 GMT darach_13 http://groups.yahoo.com/group/douglasgordonDNA/message/73 http://groups.yahoo.com/group/douglasgordonDNA/message/73 After reading this piece of nonsense, I'm really rooting for the 5% possibility the FTDNA folks gave me that I don't share a common ancestor with Gordons. Sun, 04 Feb 2007 17:37:39 GMT Egrdn@... http://groups.yahoo.com/group/douglasgordonDNA/message/72 http://groups.yahoo.com/group/douglasgordonDNA/message/72 Like many in this group, I have been interested in Y-DNA testing for genealogical purposes for more than three years. I belong to several mailing lists which Sun, 04 Feb 2007 16:28:11 GMT darach_13 http://groups.yahoo.com/group/douglasgordonDNA/message/71 http://groups.yahoo.com/group/douglasgordonDNA/message/71 Since you seem to have considerable difficulty in comprehending what you read, Jimbo, I'll reiterate that my Y-DNA results produced a 35 out of 37 match with Sat, 03 Feb 2007 16:51:08 GMT jimgordo1@... http://groups.yahoo.com/group/douglasgordonDNA/message/70 http://groups.yahoo.com/group/douglasgordonDNA/message/70 Let me explain a few things to you: 1) A 12-marker test is 99% useless unless you have a 12/12 match. This indicates a positive relationship with the person Fri, 02 Feb 2007 17:16:18 GMT Don Dawson http://groups.yahoo.com/group/douglasgordonDNA/message/69 http://groups.yahoo.com/group/douglasgordonDNA/message/69 As I said in my first post, I have a 11 out of 12 match and a 35 out of 37 match with the Gordons who match exactly with some of the Douglas results, with the Fri, 02 Feb 2007 12:43:07 GMT Beryl Turner http://groups.yahoo.com/group/douglasgordonDNA/message/68 http://groups.yahoo.com/group/douglasgordonDNA/message/68 That connection with the Gordons does seem like a bit of a coincidence given the DNA results! I wouldn't plave too much value on the 12 marker match with the Mon, 25 Dec 2006 17:20:08 GMT darach_13 http://groups.yahoo.com/group/douglasgordonDNA/message/67 http://groups.yahoo.com/group/douglasgordonDNA/message/67 Hi. I notice that the last post on this site was in August, so perhaps there hasn't been any further information since then about the Douglas/Gordon Fri, 11 Aug 2006 13:45:42 GMT John G Douglas http://groups.yahoo.com/group/douglasgordonDNA/message/66 http://groups.yahoo.com/group/douglasgordonDNA/message/66 Thanks, Beryl. --John ... Thanks, Beryl. --John At 01:32 AM 8/11/2006, you wrote: Jane - here is the ftDNATIP report on the match after 67 markers. FTDNATiP? Fri, 11 Aug 2006 07:05:59 GMT Beryl Turner http://groups.yahoo.com/group/douglasgordonDNA/message/65 http://groups.yahoo.com/group/douglasgordonDNA/message/65 Jane - here is the ftDNATIP report on the match after 67 markers. FTDNATiP? Report Family Tree DNA Time Predictor* Version 1.2 - Patent Pending In comparing Fri, 11 Aug 2006 06:49:34 GMT Beryl Turner http://groups.yahoo.com/group/douglasgordonDNA/message/64 http://groups.yahoo.com/group/douglasgordonDNA/message/64 Jane - here is the ftDNATIP report on the match after 67 markers. FTDNATiP? Report Family Tree DNA Time Predictor* Version 1.2 - Patent Pending In comparing Wed, 09 Aug 2006 09:04:55 GMT tagordon.rm http://groups.yahoo.com/group/douglasgordonDNA/message/63 http://groups.yahoo.com/group/douglasgordonDNA/message/63 Beryl, I am assuming you intended to say 67 markers? The webpage has just been updated and uploaded again. My analysis is based on best information currently Wed, 09 Aug 2006 01:55:46 GMT Beryl Turner http://groups.yahoo.com/group/douglasgordonDNA/message/62 http://groups.yahoo.com/group/douglasgordonDNA/message/62 Tei I notice that the close matches between the Douglases and Gordons have held up even under 65 markers! Have you been able to get a ftDNATIP calculation on Tue, 08 Aug 2006 14:49:06 GMT tagordon.rm http://groups.yahoo.com/group/douglasgordonDNA/message/61 http://groups.yahoo.com/group/douglasgordonDNA/message/61 Jane, I have updated our Gordon DNA webpage and included some of my thoughts on these new 67-marker results. Cut and paste the following link into your browser Thu, 03 Aug 2006 17:46:33 GMT Jane Miscavich14070 http://groups.yahoo.com/group/douglasgordonDNA/message/60 http://groups.yahoo.com/group/douglasgordonDNA/message/60 I noticed that we have the results of a Douglas and a Gordon extended DNA markers, i.e., 67 markers. Does anyone have any thoughts on the results? I'm not