drmna at Yahoo! Groups

Re: new DRMNA post

Jonathan Coles — Wed, 22 May 2013 12:41:44 GMT

Thanks. I didn't understand at first that was a URL. In my browser, it resolved to http://drmnainfo.blogspot.ca/. Are you in Canada? Same here.

Re: new DRMNA post

owdjim — Wed, 22 May 2013 02:11:48 GMT

Hi Everyone, KTWR is planning a DRM test to Japan for May 24th and 25th. It will be on 15570KHz at 1230-1300UTC. The language will be Japanese. While we

Re: new DRMNA post

digitalham@... — Wed, 22 May 2013 02:01:22 GMT

go here

Re: new DRMNA post

Jonathan Coles — Wed, 22 May 2013 01:53:05 GMT

I went to the Yahoo! group and looked under posts, but didn't find any more information than was sent to the mailing list. It would be really useful,

new DRMNA post

digitalham@... — Tue, 21 May 2013 13:27:27 GMT

KTWR Guam DRM Test - 24/25 May

Re: RA Radiogram tests - VOA 19 May success

Jonathan Coles — Sun, 19 May 2013 20:57:07 GMT

Successfully received the VOA Radiogram at 1930, even though reception conditions are quite poor today. I could hardly hear the voice announcement at the

Re: RA Radiogram tests

Mike - NZ1MT — Sun, 19 May 2013 18:12:43 GMT

If you have recorded the broadcast you can easily replay it and decode the Radiograms at another time. Yes, currently the software being used is borrowed from

Re: Radio Australia digital text 1230 UTC May 18, 2013 summary

Jonathan Coles — Sun, 19 May 2013 14:52:43 GMT

Thanks for the report. I was going to ask how we can get advance notice of these tests. One good source is the VOA Radiogram , which

Re: RA Radiogram tests [1 Attachment]

Jonathan Coles — Sun, 19 May 2013 14:42:16 GMT

Mike, The VOA site says you need Fldigi, Flmsg and Flamp and then it refers you to w1hkj.com . The Flamp Help on there looks rather

Radio Australia digital text 1230 UTC May 18, 2013 summary

kg4lac — Sun, 19 May 2013 13:05:17 GMT

May 18, 2013 9580 kHz 1230-1235 UTC SIO 444 with QRM from CRI via Cuba on 9570 kHz. ************************************************* *** Digital Text 1 *** *

Re: RA Radiogram tests

Jasmine Strong — Sat, 18 May 2013 21:44:20 GMT

Not to mention that the bitrate possible with the Mark 1 decoder hardware is rather poor; MFSK32 is hundreds of times faster. -J.

Re: RA Radiogram tests

Brendan Wahl — Sat, 18 May 2013 21:37:07 GMT

But, and it's a big but, the training it takes to get those Mark I earholes to properly decode CW is what they're trying to avoid. I spent the better part of 7

Re: RA Radiogram tests

owdjim — Sat, 18 May 2013 21:24:06 GMT

... Wellington and Hamilton for a while), now an ex-pat Kiwi in the US, been here over 11 years. ... of the US (Massachusetts). I decoded the digital

Re: RA Radiogram tests [1 Attachment]

Jonathan Coles — Sat, 18 May 2013 20:35:40 GMT

Thanks for the info, Mike. I've mostly used fldigi to decode CW. It'll be interesting to give these scheduled data transmissions a try.

Re: RA Radiogram tests

Mike - NZ1MT — Sat, 18 May 2013 20:18:24 GMT

Hello Jonathan and follow DRMers, Sorry for my rather cyprtic response to Chris's posting, I should have provided a little more explanation. Today was the