http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/easymock/ EasyMock Sat, 07 Nov 2009 17:25:49 GMT Pierre GOUPIL http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/easymock/message/1476 http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/easymock/message/1476 Hi, I'd be glad to see your code, man. cheers, Zala ... -- Sans amis était le grand maître des mondes, Eprouvait manque, ce pour quoi il créa les esprits, Sat, 07 Nov 2009 04:27:14 GMT scherer_al http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/easymock/message/1475 http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/easymock/message/1475 Hi, I've used EasyMock quite extensively in my development. To make it easier for me to use EasyMock, I created one simple class (which acts as a superclass Tue, 06 Oct 2009 22:29:28 GMT Henri Tremblay http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/easymock/message/1474 http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/easymock/message/1474 Hi, EasyMock 2 is backward compatible with EasyMock 1. You still have the MockControl class. So just changing the jar should be fine. From there, if you want Tue, 06 Oct 2009 10:35:53 GMT Khurram Chaudhary http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/easymock/message/1473 http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/easymock/message/1473 Hi All, We have a testing framework which used EasyMock 1.3 extensively, we are looking to upgrade to latest version of EasyMock, may be 2.5. I cant find any Thu, 01 Oct 2009 19:17:40 GMT Henri Tremblay http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/easymock/message/1472 http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/easymock/message/1472 Hi, Matchers can be called any amount of time. Especially in and unordered mock because it keeps looking to something that matches. It will then have Thu, 01 Oct 2009 09:04:21 GMT Bill Comer http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/easymock/message/1471 http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/easymock/message/1471 Below is a test I have knocked up that uses its own matcher. I know in this case I could use a standard matcher but in my real code I need a more complicated Tue, 29 Sep 2009 18:56:12 GMT Henri Tremblay http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/easymock/message/1470 http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/easymock/message/1470 Yes. The roadmap is: - Finish to convert EasyMock into an OSGi bundle - Deliver under MIT - Deliver under Apache (should be done really soon after MIT) - Add Tue, 29 Sep 2009 10:58:13 GMT sslavic http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/easymock/message/1469 http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/easymock/message/1469 ... Will EasyMock Class Extension follow the move to Apache 2 license? Regards, Stevo. Mon, 28 Sep 2009 21:27:39 GMT Henri Tremblay http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/easymock/message/1468 http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/easymock/message/1468 Hi, If you are using the lastest easymock version, the genuine capture allows you to capture multiple values. However it won't do your special verify :-) Mon, 28 Sep 2009 07:47:55 GMT John Hendrikx http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/easymock/message/1467 http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/easymock/message/1467 Thank you, using a Capture works for me. Although I'm not 100% sure it is allowed to capture multiple values with a Capture, but it seems to work. This is Sun, 27 Sep 2009 16:15:23 GMT Henri Tremblay http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/easymock/message/1466 http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/easymock/message/1466 Hi, It doesn't work because varargs are expanded so they are consider as separated arguments and they need a matcher each. It's normally fine but since you Fri, 25 Sep 2009 06:11:30 GMT John Hendrikx http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/easymock/message/1465 http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/easymock/message/1465 Yes, I created my own argument matcher as I said in my post, however it gives me the following exception when two LunchItems are passed: Thu, 24 Sep 2009 15:14:30 GMT Jason Winnebeck http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/easymock/message/1464 http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/easymock/message/1464 Really what you are trying to pass is a Set, then. You could make your own argument matcher that takes all of the elements in the array, puts them into a Set, Thu, 24 Sep 2009 06:20:51 GMT John Hendrikx http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/easymock/message/1463 http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/easymock/message/1463 I'm having a problem with mocking a method which uses varargs: void testMethod(String... lunchItems) The trouble is that the varargs are not required to be in Thu, 17 Sep 2009 22:06:49 GMT Henri Tremblay http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/easymock/message/1462 http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/easymock/message/1462 Hi, This group is the perfect place to post such question. Since you have one parameter and it's using a matcher, you're fne. So there's another matcher