<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" ?>
<rss xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>ematthew at Yahoo! Groups</title>
    <link>http://groups.yahoo.com/group/ematthew/</link>
    <description>E-Matthew</description>

    <item>
      <title>Re: preference in the Early Church for Matthew over Luke</title>
      <pubDate>Fri, 23 Jan 2009 21:17:15 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>Larry Swain</dc:creator>
      <link>http://groups.yahoo.com/group/ematthew/message/233</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://groups.yahoo.com/group/ematthew/message/233</guid>
      <description>... In addition, one might look at the commentaries and sermons on Matthean texts in comparison to the other 3, particularly Luke.  And I believe, though not</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: preference in the Early Church for Matthew over Luke</title>
      <pubDate>Fri, 23 Jan 2009 21:04:52 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>jason hood</dc:creator>
      <link>http://groups.yahoo.com/group/ematthew/message/232</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://groups.yahoo.com/group/ematthew/message/232</guid>
      <description>Jeffery, YES (but not just Luke, mind you--Mark and John etc. as well). Causal factors?  Probably the early interest in ethics/morals (viz. christology) and</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>preference in the Early Church for Matthew over Luke</title>
      <pubDate>Fri, 23 Jan 2009 20:48:56 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>Jeffrey B. Gibson</dc:creator>
      <link>http://groups.yahoo.com/group/ematthew/message/231</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://groups.yahoo.com/group/ematthew/message/231</guid>
      <description>Would it be true to say that Matthew&#39;s Gospel seems to have been preferred from early on in the Church&#39;s history over Luke&#39;s as the source from which Jesus&#39;</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>my recent SBL paper on the Lor&#39;d Prayer and the Synagogue</title>
      <pubDate>Thu, 27 Nov 2008 20:35:50 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>Jeffrey B. Gibson</dc:creator>
      <link>http://groups.yahoo.com/group/ematthew/message/230</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://groups.yahoo.com/group/ematthew/message/230</guid>
      <description>I&#39;ve just uploaded the paper I presented at SBL on whether the Synagogue and its liturgy is the matrix of the Lord&#39;s Prayer. It&#39;s available for viewing at my</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>second notice of the 12th annual SBL E-Lister&#39;s Meeting</title>
      <pubDate>Thu, 20 Nov 2008 01:46:12 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>Jeffrey B. Gibson</dc:creator>
      <link>http://groups.yahoo.com/group/ematthew/message/229</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://groups.yahoo.com/group/ematthew/message/229</guid>
      <description>With apologies for cross posting. This is the second notice of the 12th annual E-Lister&#39;s gathering at the Annual Meeting of the Society of Biblical Literature</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>12th Annual SBL E-Listers&#39; Meeting</title>
      <pubDate>Fri, 17 Oct 2008 17:11:08 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>Jeffrey B. Gibson</dc:creator>
      <link>http://groups.yahoo.com/group/ematthew/message/228</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://groups.yahoo.com/group/ematthew/message/228</guid>
      <description>With apologies for cross posting. It&#39;s that time of year again when the Society of Biblical Literature&#39;s Annual Meeting is just round the corner (Nov. 21st-</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Ignoring Patristic exegesis of the Lord&#39;s Prayer</title>
      <pubDate>Sun, 28 Sep 2008 18:20:32 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>MillerJimE@...</dc:creator>
      <link>http://groups.yahoo.com/group/ematthew/message/227</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://groups.yahoo.com/group/ematthew/message/227</guid>
      <description>Let&#39;s try this again. Unfortunately, we do not have the original Aramaic  (assuming it existed).  So there is a difficulty in doing exegesis on that  original,</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Ignoring Patristic exegesis of the Lord&#39;s Prayer</title>
      <pubDate>Sat, 27 Sep 2008 20:06:18 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>Jeffrey B. Gibson</dc:creator>
      <link>http://groups.yahoo.com/group/ematthew/message/226</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://groups.yahoo.com/group/ematthew/message/226</guid>
      <description>... I appreciate the thrust of this comment, but I have my doubts about its truth.  Is Tertullian&#39;s cultural world really the same cultural world in which the</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Ignoring Patristic exegesis of the Lord&#39;s Prayer</title>
      <pubDate>Sat, 27 Sep 2008 19:32:39 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>Larry Swain</dc:creator>
      <link>http://groups.yahoo.com/group/ematthew/message/225</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://groups.yahoo.com/group/ematthew/message/225</guid>
      <description>Following up on Jim&#39;s comments, one of the values of early commentaries is that they share a cultural world with the contexts in which the Lord&#39;s Prayer is</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Ignoring Patristic exegesis of the Lord&#39;s Prayer</title>
      <pubDate>Sat, 27 Sep 2008 19:26:16 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>MillerJimE@...</dc:creator>
      <link>http://groups.yahoo.com/group/ematthew/message/224</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://groups.yahoo.com/group/ematthew/message/224</guid>
      <description>There remains the question of what modern  commentators wish to understand about the text.  I see two areas where  attention to the earliest commentaries are</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Ignoring Patristic exegesis of the Lord&#39;s Prayer</title>
      <pubDate>Sat, 27 Sep 2008 17:12:51 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>Jeffrey B. Gibson</dc:creator>
      <link>http://groups.yahoo.com/group/ematthew/message/223</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://groups.yahoo.com/group/ematthew/message/223</guid>
      <description>... Here is a draft of what I&#39;ve written as an answer to my question. Comments and criticisms and suggestions for improvement are welcome. Jeffrey ******** </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>sources for Matt. 4:1-11 according to Griesbachians</title>
      <pubDate>Tue, 10 Jun 2008 21:08:55 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>Jeffrey B. Gibson</dc:creator>
      <link>http://groups.yahoo.com/group/ematthew/message/222</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://groups.yahoo.com/group/ematthew/message/222</guid>
      <description>Can anyone here tell me what the Griesbachian position is (let alone if there here is one, or only one) on the origin of Matt. 4:1-11?  What source or sources,</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>what the devil is the Devil &quot;up to&quot; in the wilderness temptation nar</title>
      <pubDate>Mon, 12 May 2008 20:02:23 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>Jeffrey B. Gibson</dc:creator>
      <link>http://groups.yahoo.com/group/ematthew/message/221</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://groups.yahoo.com/group/ematthew/message/221</guid>
      <description>Apologies for cross posting, but I&#39;d like to have as many people as possible see the questions and requests I&#39;m posting in this message. I&#39;m revising some</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Matthew 1:17</title>
      <pubDate>Tue, 04 Dec 2007 05:58:51 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>Larry J. Swain</dc:creator>
      <link>http://groups.yahoo.com/group/ematthew/message/220</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://groups.yahoo.com/group/ematthew/message/220</guid>
      <description>Stephen Carlson has been blogging about Matthew 1:17: http://www.hypotyposeis.org/weblog/</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Forthcoming Book on Matthew</title>
      <pubDate>Wed, 19 Sep 2007 01:35:18 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>Larry J. Swain</dc:creator>
      <link>http://groups.yahoo.com/group/ematthew/message/219</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://groups.yahoo.com/group/ematthew/message/219</guid>
      <description>Joel Willitts of the Evangelion blog had a recent post about his forthcoming book on Matthew I thought folks might be interested in: </description>
    </item>

  </channel>
</rss>
<!-- rss2.grp.bf1.yahoo.com uncompressed Thu May 23 08:58:20 PDT 2013 -->
