<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" ?>
<rss xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>eos3 at Yahoo! Groups</title>
    <link>http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/eos3/</link>
    <description>Canon EOS-3 / EOS-1V camera owners</description>

    <item>
      <title>Canon EOS 3</title>
      <pubDate>Mon, 06 Jul 2009 00:32:21 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>Rodrigo Gimenez</dc:creator>
      <link>http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/eos3/message/13719</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/eos3/message/13719</guid>
      <description>hello, just bought an EOS3 with E1 booster, original grip for 2CR5 battery, 550EX flash! with manuals for both, strap, case for the flash, 6 rolls of slide</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: New user</title>
      <pubDate>Fri, 20 Mar 2009 02:38:11 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>rodgimenez</dc:creator>
      <link>http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/eos3/message/13718</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/eos3/message/13718</guid>
      <description>... Congratulations, enjoy your new camera. Some film cameras have a back LCD, like the most recent Rebel (about 2002 to 2005 models), Minolta Maxxum 7 (with</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>New user</title>
      <pubDate>Thu, 19 Mar 2009 19:55:08 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>robert7110a</dc:creator>
      <link>http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/eos3/message/13717</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/eos3/message/13717</guid>
      <description>I used my EOS 3 for the first time today. Cannot believe how much brighter the viewfinder is (compared to my dSLR) and how much easier it is to manually focus</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Return to film?</title>
      <pubDate>Thu, 19 Mar 2009 14:59:19 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>CARLTON CHONG</dc:creator>
      <link>http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/eos3/message/13716</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/eos3/message/13716</guid>
      <description>WOW, just checked this email account (forgot I had it) and got flashbacks seeing these EOS3 group emails!  I had my EOS3 for the longest while and then got a</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Return to film?</title>
      <pubDate>Thu, 19 Mar 2009 14:54:22 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>CARLTON CHONG</dc:creator>
      <link>http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/eos3/message/13715</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/eos3/message/13715</guid>
      <description>While I shoot 99% of my work in digital these days, I agree with the earlier post that there&#39;s something to film that digital lacks... maybe it&#39;s tactile that</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Return to film?</title>
      <pubDate>Mon, 16 Mar 2009 11:12:50 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>robert armstrong</dc:creator>
      <link>http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/eos3/message/13714</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/eos3/message/13714</guid>
      <description>Indeed and I was just sharing my experiences rather than open up the film v digital debate again which was not the purpose of my original message ... From:</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Return to film?</title>
      <pubDate>Sun, 15 Mar 2009 20:14:10 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>rodgimenez</dc:creator>
      <link>http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/eos3/message/13713</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/eos3/message/13713</guid>
      <description>... Not sure but probably you refer to current DSRL having very good big print capability. Probably he doesn&#39;t need big enlargements. Also, it is a matter of</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Return to film?</title>
      <pubDate>Sun, 15 Mar 2009 20:10:25 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>christianaurel</dc:creator>
      <link>http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/eos3/message/13712</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/eos3/message/13712</guid>
      <description>... i use 35 mm, but i am very happy with it</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Return to film?</title>
      <pubDate>Sun, 15 Mar 2009 19:20:41 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>robert armstrong</dc:creator>
      <link>http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/eos3/message/13711</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/eos3/message/13711</guid>
      <description>Do you use 35mm or medium format film? I assume if the latter...then yes I can understand. Robert UK ... From: christianaurel &lt;christianaurel@...&gt; </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Return to film?</title>
      <pubDate>Sun, 15 Mar 2009 12:35:09 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>christianaurel</dc:creator>
      <link>http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/eos3/message/13710</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/eos3/message/13710</guid>
      <description>... I never used digital camera and i won&#39;t use it until film will die. Why i should go for digital camera when my results are great? Why to go for a digital</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Return to film?</title>
      <pubDate>Sat, 14 Mar 2009 15:04:46 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>rodgimenez</dc:creator>
      <link>http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/eos3/message/13709</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/eos3/message/13709</guid>
      <description>... True, I&#39;ve read a lot on the web forums who are returning partially to film, and a few who returned totally.</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Return to film?</title>
      <pubDate>Sat, 14 Mar 2009 15:03:12 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>rodgimenez</dc:creator>
      <link>http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/eos3/message/13708</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/eos3/message/13708</guid>
      <description>... They may have their reasons, like enjoying doing it, the look of film photographs, infrared, or the darkroom for black and white.</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Return to film?</title>
      <pubDate>Sat, 14 Mar 2009 06:41:55 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>David Birkin</dc:creator>
      <link>http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/eos3/message/13707</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/eos3/message/13707</guid>
      <description>... Though if one is going to spend the time, money and effort of scanning the film-to-digital why not shoot digitally in the first instance? [Non-text</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Return to film?</title>
      <pubDate>Sat, 14 Mar 2009 04:10:31 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>cyberasmith</dc:creator>
      <link>http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/eos3/message/13706</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/eos3/message/13706</guid>
      <description>... No, Robert, you are not the only one! Ever hear of a fellow on the WWW named Ken Rockwell? He&#39;s been shooting digital for ages (prefers Nikons for</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Return to film?</title>
      <pubDate>Fri, 13 Mar 2009 21:01:12 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>robert armstrong</dc:creator>
      <link>http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/eos3/message/13705</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/eos3/message/13705</guid>
      <description>Indeed. Perhaps in 5-10 years time, a sensor would be developed which does away with the filter and the moire problems solved.   Also nothing (or little) to</description>
    </item>

  </channel>
</rss>
<!-- wr1.grp.sp2.yahoo.com uncompressed/chunked Fri Jul 10 05:21:27 PDT 2009 -->
