http://groups.yahoo.com/group/epistemology/ epistemology Wed, 30 Dec 2009 18:21:56 GMT Georges Metanomski http://groups.yahoo.com/group/epistemology/message/4460 http://groups.yahoo.com/group/epistemology/message/4460 ========== Reminder: The present thread is destined to discuss the rationality of the Second Enlightenment as well as to inquire into the sources of the Tue, 29 Dec 2009 15:56:34 GMT Antonio Rossin http://groups.yahoo.com/group/epistemology/message/4459 http://groups.yahoo.com/group/epistemology/message/4459 Georges, Please excuse me, but in your last post there was no hint telling me - as the addressee - that it was meant to FE only, not to SE. Thanks for the Tue, 29 Dec 2009 10:31:40 GMT Georges Metanomski http://groups.yahoo.com/group/epistemology/message/4458 http://groups.yahoo.com/group/epistemology/message/4458 analytical-indicant-theory@yahoogroups.com, workshop_fg@yahoogroups.com, wddm@..., wddm-list@yahoogroups.com, Tue, 29 Dec 2009 08:21:28 GMT Antonio Rossin http://groups.yahoo.com/group/epistemology/message/4457 http://groups.yahoo.com/group/epistemology/message/4457 Georges, I read through your F4, F5 of SE. I've found no reply to my main question, how to install the SE natter into PITS's awareness and consistence, not to Sun, 27 Dec 2009 08:22:45 GMT Georges Metanomski http://groups.yahoo.com/group/epistemology/message/4456 http://groups.yahoo.com/group/epistemology/message/4456 ========== Reminder: The present thread is destined to discuss the rationality of the Second Enlightenment as well as to inquire into the sources of the Sat, 26 Dec 2009 08:33:28 GMT Antonio Rossin http://groups.yahoo.com/group/epistemology/message/4455 http://groups.yahoo.com/group/epistemology/message/4455 ... Me too does not want to impose-install it on anybody in any way. What I am concerned about, it is a suitable installer program, or method, or model, or Fri, 25 Dec 2009 13:47:02 GMT Georges Metanomski http://groups.yahoo.com/group/epistemology/message/4454 http://groups.yahoo.com/group/epistemology/message/4454 ... Georges, your descriptions of "Rational Method or Rationality" and "Scientific Method or Science" are excellent, as usual, as far as I can see. Fri, 25 Dec 2009 10:35:16 GMT Antonio Rossin http://groups.yahoo.com/group/epistemology/message/4453 http://groups.yahoo.com/group/epistemology/message/4453 Georges, your descriptions of "Rational Method or Rationality" and "Scientific Method or Science" are excellent, as usual, as far as I can see. Nevertheless I Wed, 23 Dec 2009 09:16:01 GMT Georges Metanomski http://groups.yahoo.com/group/epistemology/message/4452 http://groups.yahoo.com/group/epistemology/message/4452 In a previous post I have described what I consider and use as "scientific method": 1.Definition of "interest area" and getting expertise in its existing Tue, 22 Dec 2009 10:00:28 GMT Georges Metanomski http://groups.yahoo.com/group/epistemology/message/4451 http://groups.yahoo.com/group/epistemology/message/4451 Off topic . This is not about II Enlightenment, nor does it "target" PITS. It is a discussion with Richard about the common philosophical term "reification", Tue, 22 Dec 2009 08:27:31 GMT Antonio Rossin http://groups.yahoo.com/group/epistemology/message/4450 http://groups.yahoo.com/group/epistemology/message/4450 (I'm re-posting because my previus mail was unreadable) ... *Georges, I must correct, because the comments I inserted to your previous post were five, not one Mon, 21 Dec 2009 17:21:46 GMT Antonio Rossin http://groups.yahoo.com/group/epistemology/message/4449 http://groups.yahoo.com/group/epistemology/message/4449 ... *Georges, I must correct, because the comments I inserted to your previous post were five, not one only as I headed in my reply as. Indeed, I suppose Mon, 21 Dec 2009 09:44:34 GMT Georges Metanomski http://groups.yahoo.com/group/epistemology/message/4448 http://groups.yahoo.com/group/epistemology/message/4448 ... Georges, In your writing below, you did not explain what the concept "Reification" stands for, even though you've put it clear how we language users do use Mon, 21 Dec 2009 08:47:08 GMT Antonio Rossin http://groups.yahoo.com/group/epistemology/message/4447 http://groups.yahoo.com/group/epistemology/message/4447 Georges, In your writing below, you did not explain *what* the concept "Reification" stands for, even though you've put it clear *how* we language users do use Sun, 20 Dec 2009 13:46:50 GMT Georges Metanomski http://groups.yahoo.com/group/epistemology/message/4446 http://groups.yahoo.com/group/epistemology/message/4446 Science, Philosophy, Music, Skiing do not exist, but are reified phantasms. So are Scientists, Philosophers, Musicians and Skiers. What exists are humans whose