<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" ?>
<rss xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>erp4it at Yahoo! Groups</title>
    <link>http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/erp4it/</link>
    <description>ERP for IT</description>

    <item>
      <title>Re: New directions: TOC for IT</title>
      <pubDate>Sat, 04 Apr 2009 19:23:02 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>Charles Betz</dc:creator>
      <link>http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/erp4it/message/782</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/erp4it/message/782</guid>
      <description>yes... On Sat, Apr 4, 2009 at 12:07 PM, Stuart Charlton</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: New directions: TOC for IT</title>
      <pubDate>Sat, 04 Apr 2009 19:21:42 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>Stuart Charlton</dc:creator>
      <link>http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/erp4it/message/781</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/erp4it/message/781</guid>
      <description>Theory of Constraints? Sent from my iPhone On Apr 4, 2009, at 6:52 AM, Charles Betz &lt;char@...&gt; wrote: New directions: TOC for IT I feel like being</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>New directions: TOC for IT</title>
      <pubDate>Sat, 04 Apr 2009 13:53:54 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>Charles Betz</dc:creator>
      <link>http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/erp4it/message/780</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/erp4it/message/780</guid>
      <description>New directions: TOC for IT I feel like being cryptic. I just registered toc4it.com, toc4it.net, and toc4it.info. erp4it is nearing the end of its run...</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>IT Capability Maturity Framework (IT-CMF)</title>
      <pubDate>Fri, 20 Feb 2009 00:02:25 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>jqpearson</dc:creator>
      <link>http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/erp4it/message/779</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/erp4it/message/779</guid>
      <description>I see that the &quot;Innovation Value Institute (IVI) at National University of Ireland (NUI) Maynooth&quot; have introduced &quot;the IT Capability Maturity Framework</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Systems dynamics: a challenge to &quot;enterprise&quot; architecture?</title>
      <pubDate>Sat, 31 Jan 2009 14:22:04 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>Charles Betz</dc:creator>
      <link>http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/erp4it/message/778</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/erp4it/message/778</guid>
      <description>Stuart, your thoughtful post got flagged by Google as spam. Many apologies for the delayed acceptance. On Mon, Jan 5, 2009 at 11:37 AM, Stuart Charlton</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Systems dynamics: a challenge to &quot;enterprise&quot; architecture?</title>
      <pubDate>Sat, 31 Jan 2009 14:19:33 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>Stuart Charlton</dc:creator>
      <link>http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/erp4it/message/777</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/erp4it/message/777</guid>
      <description>I have Sterman&#39;s book and found it useful; when I was an EA I do recall a couple of colleagues that were influenced by (an older but still relevant view of</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: SPAM-LOW: [erp4it] Re: The CMDB is an Operational Data Store</title>
      <pubDate>Thu, 22 Jan 2009 02:11:05 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>Roy Roebuck</dc:creator>
      <link>http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/erp4it/message/776</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/erp4it/message/776</guid>
      <description>Yes, considering that semantic technology is by definition, metadata technology. Roy Roebuck Managing Director One World Information System A Non-Profit</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: SPAM-LOW: [erp4it] Re: The CMDB is an Operational Data Store</title>
      <pubDate>Mon, 19 Jan 2009 18:31:36 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>Charles Betz</dc:creator>
      <link>http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/erp4it/message/775</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/erp4it/message/775</guid>
      <description>Interesting points I generally agree with. However the concept of ODS is architectural and does not specify implementation technology. I think we could call</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: SPAM-LOW:  [erp4it] Re: The CMDB is an Operational Data Store</title>
      <pubDate>Mon, 19 Jan 2009 18:04:55 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>Roy Roebuck</dc:creator>
      <link>http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/erp4it/message/774</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/erp4it/message/774</guid>
      <description>Building and maintaining a CMDB using just a relational database is very inefficient and ineffective.  Using a metadata repository (MDR), e.g., MOF, is better,</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: The CMDB is an Operational Data Store</title>
      <pubDate>Sun, 18 Jan 2009 20:40:57 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>John M. Clark</dc:creator>
      <link>http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/erp4it/message/773</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/erp4it/message/773</guid>
      <description>I agree with the arguments provided here for what  CMDB is but there is one point that I would argue is often missed... Volatile. &quot;Every time the data in the</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>The CMDB is an Operational Data Store</title>
      <pubDate>Sat, 17 Jan 2009 18:37:01 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>Charles Betz</dc:creator>
      <link>http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/erp4it/message/772</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/erp4it/message/772</guid>
      <description>The CMDB is an Operational Data Store Longtime readers know that bringing some sense of architectural rigor to ITIL is an ongoing goal of this blog. The CMDB,</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: ERP- 4- IT Reports</title>
      <pubDate>Fri, 09 Jan 2009 01:20:37 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>Charles Betz</dc:creator>
      <link>http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/erp4it/message/771</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/erp4it/message/771</guid>
      <description>See http://www.amazon.com/Metrics-Service-Management-Peter-Brooks/dp/9077212698 </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>ERP- 4-  IT Reports</title>
      <pubDate>Fri, 09 Jan 2009 01:10:28 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>heather</dc:creator>
      <link>http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/erp4it/message/770</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/erp4it/message/770</guid>
      <description>New to the group here. Question re: IT Utopia ERP in the classic sense derives it&#39;s value from the information it brings to all the entities participating, and</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Systems dynamics: a challenge to &quot;enterprise&quot; architecture?</title>
      <pubDate>Tue, 06 Jan 2009 22:12:46 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>Oliver Sims</dc:creator>
      <link>http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/erp4it/message/769</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/erp4it/message/769</guid>
      <description>Charlie, I don&#39;t claim to be super-current on Systems Dynamics, but I was much into the same sort of thing in the 1970s (then called by names such as</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Systems dynamics: a challenge to &quot;enterprise&quot; architecture?</title>
      <pubDate>Sun, 04 Jan 2009 16:04:35 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>Charles Betz</dc:creator>
      <link>http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/erp4it/message/768</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/erp4it/message/768</guid>
      <description>Systems dynamics: a challenge to &quot;enterprise&quot; architecture? Followers of this site and IT Skeptic may have noticed a number of debates concerning industrial</description>
    </item>

  </channel>
</rss>
<!-- wr1.grp.sp2.yahoo.com uncompressed/chunked Sat Jul 11 03:09:44 PDT 2009 -->
