eurobrit at Yahoo! Groups

Re: is this a legal move?

Ken Agress — Wed, 01 Jul 2009 16:43:47 GMT

... all that ... confusions is ... literal-minded, ... It would ... between the lines". ... the lines. I'm not sure if I'm being accused of something sinister

Origins and electronic Brit

Lewis Pulsipher — Wed, 01 Jul 2009 15:30:11 GMT

Origins was no help on the electronic Brit front. The major publisher of electronic wargames, Matrix, wasn't there for the first time in some years. In

Re: is this a legal move?

Lewis Pulsipher — Wed, 01 Jul 2009 15:27:53 GMT

I'm sure there are conventions in reading game rules--have to be--but "not all that uncommon" doesn't make it. Yet I'm sure that the root of many rules

Further question regarding Angles.

kevin.ramsell — Tue, 30 Jun 2009 16:04:16 GMT

On a second note, if Angles do work as per Roman can they relocate through Brigantes, as the rules note the Angles unlike the Roman cannot move through

Quick question regarding Angles.

kevin.ramsell — Tue, 30 Jun 2009 15:50:32 GMT

Can Angles retreat to adjacent empty areas when receiving Brigante submission in the same awy as Romans?

E-Brit?

tinnurandir — Tue, 30 Jun 2009 14:34:35 GMT

Is there anyone interested in playing Britannia by E-Mail? Plays anyone Brittania by mail or were the last games years ago? If E-Brit isn't dead, is it only

Re: is this a legal move?

Ken Agress — Tue, 30 Jun 2009 13:30:22 GMT

... its ... I'd say because it's not all that uncommon a convention for movement with leaders in games. You're correct that it's an assumption, but it's not

Re: is this a legal move?

Lewis Pulsipher — Tue, 30 Jun 2009 13:09:04 GMT

Well, to me, if it doesn't say the unit must accompany the leader during its **entire** move, why would you assume that? It's the assumption that creates the

Re: Frankia 1215 scenario

highplainsgamer — Tue, 30 Jun 2009 12:48:10 GMT

... The whole period of the Albigensian crusade is rather interesting. The politics are quite intricate. You have a pope declaring a crusade inside of a

Re: Frankia 1215 scenario

Heli, Rick — Mon, 29 Jun 2009 23:00:11 GMT

On Mon, Jun 29, 2009 at 5:33 AM, David Bofinger < ... Is it clear that they did? At a certain point the French king was only the third most powerful overlord,

Re: is this a legal move?

Ken Agress — Mon, 29 Jun 2009 21:49:39 GMT

There ya go - we played it wrong. As I said, it's simply unclear. "Accompany" can be read as "for the portion of the move where the leader is needed." Or it

Re: is this a legal move?

Matthew Taylor — Mon, 29 Jun 2009 21:27:13 GMT

It is your game of course but I would argue that when the leader goes one way without the cavalry, the cavalry has been dropped off - ie their move is over.

Re: 2008 rules posted

Lewis Pulsipher — Mon, 29 Jun 2009 21:20:56 GMT

I haven't tried to compare this printed version with the draft version, other than to note that there's a considerable size difference in the files. And lord

Re: is this a legal move?

Lewis Pulsipher — Mon, 29 Jun 2009 21:19:25 GMT

If they accompany the leader while they make the move, the move is legal, even if they later part ways with the leader. Isn't accompany pretty clear? It

Re: Frankia 1215 scenario

Lewis Pulsipher — Mon, 29 Jun 2009 21:16:48 GMT

This game is at a much higher scale than what you're talking about. Modern France is all of five areas (I'm not counting Brittany). There are turns when one