evangelicals_and_jws at Yahoo! Groups

File - Posting Limits

Sun, 01 Nov 2009 20:41:21 GMT

This is an automated message that will go out every two weeks as a "reminder message". Please keep in mind that we have set a "5 post limit" per day. This

File - Group Rules

Sun, 01 Nov 2009 20:41:21 GMT

This discussion group offers an opportunity for respectful, intelligent discussion of the theological differences between those who espouse evangelical

John 17:3 again (was: Re: Separation of Person and Nature...).

stevku — Mon, 26 Oct 2009 21:58:08 GMT

... Hi Jason. I didn't want to give the impression that the Son was just a man. But He is one personality who is God and man but with the all the trappings of

Tertullian on the Eternity, Immutability, and Incarnation of the Wor

banjomaster1 — Mon, 26 Oct 2009 20:03:45 GMT

To all, Because it is a recurring trend on this forum for JWs to appeal to Tertullian in favour of their Theology and Christology over against that of Nicaea

Re: John 17:3 again (was: Re: Separation of Person and Nature...).

jason homey — Mon, 26 Oct 2009 18:58:11 GMT

________________________________ From: stevku To: evangelicals_and_jws@yahoogroups.com Sent: Sat, October 24, 2009 6:52:13 PM Subject:

Re: Should You Believe It?

jason homey — Mon, 26 Oct 2009 18:51:14 GMT

Hi Donn, Thanks for the link. May I ask what you see as being the primary significance of the historical data presented here? I, as you probably suspect

John 17:3 again (was: Re: Separation of Person and Nature...).

stevku — Sun, 25 Oct 2009 01:57:18 GMT

... No offense taken. I agree with this. The Word born out of God became flesh and was born of Mary. In Christ, Steve

Re: Should You Believe It?

donn reese — Sat, 24 Oct 2009 15:33:29 GMT

Barry, Jason- How many Jesus' (conceptually) were there- http://fromdeathtolife.org/christory/christ1b.html An historical refresher course. Regards Donn

Re: Should You Believe It?

Barry H. — Sat, 24 Oct 2009 11:44:54 GMT

... From: "jason homey" To: Sent: Saturday, October 24, 2009 4:07 AM Subject: Re:

Re: John 17:3 again (was: Re: Separation of Person and Nature...).

jason homey — Sat, 24 Oct 2009 08:44:29 GMT

Hi Steve, No personal offense intended by the following, but, for the sake of O/orthodoxy, here goes: "If anyone does not confess that there are TWO

Re: Should You Believe It?

jason homey — Sat, 24 Oct 2009 08:09:18 GMT

________________________________ From: Barry To: evangelicals_and_jws@yahoogroups.com Sent: Sat, September 26, 2009 4:12:38 AM Subject:

Re: Greg Stafford on praying to Jesus

jason homey — Sat, 24 Oct 2009 07:31:13 GMT

To all, In addition to the many NT passages which Rob has cited which clearly show that Christ is the rightful object of prayer, I would like to add that there

Greg Stafford on praying to Jesus

Rob — Mon, 19 Oct 2009 04:49:04 GMT

Dear friends, My second blog entry on the third edition of Greg Stafford's book _Jehovah's Witnesses Defended_ focuses on his admission that it is proper to

File - Group Rules

Sun, 18 Oct 2009 23:51:00 GMT

This discussion group offers an opportunity for respectful, intelligent discussion of the theological differences between those who espouse evangelical

File - Posting Limits

Sun, 18 Oct 2009 23:51:00 GMT

This is an automated message that will go out every two weeks as a "reminder message". Please keep in mind that we have set a "5 post limit" per day. This