evolutionversuscreationism at Yahoo! Groups

Re: How Do You Spot A Bad Scientific Argument?

Steve S — Wed, 06 Jan 2010 01:12:48 GMT

... You really need to brush up on your reading comprehension skills. This is not what Rosenhouse claimed. His claim was that it was extremely unlikely that

(no subject)

humancarol@... — Tue, 05 Jan 2010 15:35:45 GMT

Re: Creationist "Discovery" Institute Busted. There is a movement to stop Creationists' censorship tactics on YouTube: http://is.gd/5Mmp4 [video] Stop YouTube

Re: The Bible falsifies itself

valaitis andrius — Tue, 05 Jan 2010 15:30:14 GMT

Carol wrote: {* Isaiah 7:14 referred to a young woman ('almah'), not a virgin ('etulot').} "almah" in Hebrew can also mean damsel or virgin. (according to

Re: The Bible falsifies itself

valaitis andrius — Tue, 05 Jan 2010 10:37:52 GMT

What is the problem with understanding? Jesus, according to Matthew and Luke, was both the Son of God and Son of David. Son of David legally through

Re: How Do You Spot A Bad Scientific Argument?

valaitis andrius — Tue, 05 Jan 2010 10:13:48 GMT

Thank you for posting this article by Mr. Rosenhouse, who appears to be quite a gentleman of genteel manner. He presents a fair selection of creation/ID

Re: The Bible affirms itself

valaitis andrius — Tue, 05 Jan 2010 09:02:10 GMT

Jesus was not fathered by Joseph, yet Joseph was His legal father. Anyway, if you want a blood line, you've got it through Mary. You guys do much better

Re: Be Afraid

valaitis andrius — Tue, 05 Jan 2010 08:51:39 GMT

I'm afraid of PZ Meyers, who obviously has a "hate God agenda" (calling God "vicious " and "petty"). McLeroy is made out to be the villain ("corrupting

Re: The Bible falsifies itself

HumanCarol — Tue, 05 Jan 2010 04:53:47 GMT

... cs:> No kidding!! ... RAY PERREAULT wrote: <> I

Creationist "Discovery" Institute Busted.

HumanCarol — Tue, 05 Jan 2010 04:37:07 GMT

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=A-cmHJthuq8 Creationist organization the Discovery Institute is caught red handed in illegal censorship- ironically the same

Expanding and expanding

humancarol@... — Tue, 05 Jan 2010 04:07:44 GMT

http://dingo.care2.com/cards/flash/5409/galaxy.swf [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]

Re: The Bible affirms itself

RAY PERREAULT — Mon, 04 Jan 2010 23:59:12 GMT

________________________________ From: HumanCarol To: evolutionversuscreationism@yahoogroups.com Sent: Mon, January 4, 2010 4:41:00 PM

Re: The Bible affirms itself

HumanCarol — Mon, 04 Jan 2010 22:42:53 GMT

valaitis andrius wrote: << Joseph was descended from David via Solomon. That reinforces the fact that Jesus was the Son of David, doesn't

Re: The Bible affirms itself

HumanCarol — Mon, 04 Jan 2010 22:41:10 GMT

... No kidding!! It is entertaining, though to see the contortions folks go through trying to make the House of David Connection.

"Liberty U disputes evolution" (David DeWitt)

HumanCarol — Mon, 04 Jan 2010 22:31:59 GMT

http://www2.newsadvance.com/lna/news/local/article/liberty_university_refuting_evolution/13475/ Liberty University disputing evolution [Jill Nance photo of

How Do You Spot A Bad Scientific Argument?

HumanCarol — Mon, 04 Jan 2010 22:22:41 GMT

From November 2006 http://www.csicop.org/intelligentdesignwatch/arguments.html Creation & Intelligent Design Watch Hosted by the Committee for the Scientific