executableuml at Yahoo! Groups

Re: Why the structure datatype?

lwriemen — Sat, 09 Jan 2010 06:27:36 GMT

... IMO, if every member of the structured data type is accessed in the domain model, then it should be a class in the domain. It is obviously important enough

Re: BridgePoint License

lwriemen — Thu, 07 Jan 2010 17:21:38 GMT

... Some of the other Executable UML tools are available from: Kennedy Carter http://www.kc.com/ Pathfinder Solutions http://www.pathfindermda.com/ Kavanagh

Re: BridgePoint License

samirrecife — Wed, 06 Jan 2010 20:46:49 GMT

Hi lwriemen, yesterday I sent an e-mail to mentor's support and the engineering told me that they had an issue with the Demo`s version download and that they

Re: BridgePoint License

lwriemen — Wed, 06 Jan 2010 16:33:29 GMT

I would contact Mentor Graphics about both of your questions. They have pretty good support. You could also try some other tools for demo. There are often

BridgePoint License

samirrecife — Tue, 05 Jan 2010 06:10:49 GMT

Hi everyone, I have just started to read the book and I`m trying to execute the book examples, but I`m having problems with BridgePoint`s License. Maybe I`m

Why the structure datatype?

lwriemen — Fri, 01 Jan 2010 02:52:53 GMT

I've seen data structures introduced as a data type in Executable UML tools and metamodels. This is legal per the Executable UML book's definition of the

Re: xUML Compiler

lwriemen — Sun, 29 Nov 2009 04:24:53 GMT

A good model compiler should also be completely non-invasive to the model. i.e., The analyst shouldn't have to even think about the use of a model compiler,

Re: xUML Compiler

mjbalcer — Wed, 25 Nov 2009 17:01:58 GMT

A "model compiler" is not a single tool, but a characterization of an entire class of applications. A model compiler is essentially a program that reads a

xUML Compiler

samirrecife — Wed, 25 Nov 2009 16:23:19 GMT

Hi everyone, I`m a master degree student and I`m at the right begging of my research, so I still reading more about xUML. At the right moment I`m looking for a

Re: Beyond Referential Attributes

Leon Starr — Wed, 21 Oct 2009 22:02:41 GMT

Hey Marc, Just wanted to chime in briefly as I am thinking on this topic a bit as I push the miUML metamodel forward. I read your paper yesterday and am

Re: Beyond Referential Attributes

Caitlin Bestler — Tue, 20 Oct 2009 00:01:56 GMT

... In my usage there are essentially two types of referential attributes: * Those that express "in the context of". A department is unique within the context

Beyond Referential Attributes

mjbalcer — Tue, 13 Oct 2009 22:22:28 GMT

Recently Leon Starr tweeted: As much as I try, I just can't avoid using referential attributes. I just don't know a better way to think about association

UML Software

Twaha Uddessy — Tue, 06 Oct 2009 15:36:17 GMT

Hello all, Iam new to this forum and to executable UML.Sorry I have this simple question.Where Can I get UML software + tutorials? thanks in advance Winning

Re: UML action sementics

Lee Riemenschneider — Mon, 29 Jun 2009 03:45:52 GMT

... Executable UML doesn't have this uncertainty at the model level. Inheritance is an implementation mechanism. (See the gray text in section 6.5.1.) This

Re: UML action sementics

Shunaila Amin — Sun, 14 Jun 2009 19:17:19 GMT

but how we can implement those actions sementices at any state machine???? ... From: Lee Riemenschneider Subject: [executableuml] Re: