exim-users at Yahoo! Groups

Re: [exim] Failover design with exim (slightly OT)

Lanny Jason Godsey — Fri, 07 Oct 2005 22:54:25 GMT

I think I've mentioned this before, but if not here it goes. I was thinking of having exim dump mail into either MySQL Cluster or multi-master replication

[exim] X-Post: LDAP lookup inside system filter

ashkan — Fri, 07 Oct 2005 22:23:35 GMT

Hi all Sorry about the cross-post. I tried this on exim-users with no response so I thought I would try my luck here. Really simply: does anyone know if its

Re: [exim] Failover design with exim (slightly OT)

Dennis Skinner — Fri, 07 Oct 2005 21:53:37 GMT

... I have been thinking about doing something very similar to this. In my case, I have 4 servers, each having a subset of maildirs, so A->A&B, B->B&C,

Re: [exim] Why the dodgy HELOs?

Adam Funk — Fri, 07 Oct 2005 18:57:55 GMT

... Interesting idea. I suppose even they recognise limitations on their resources. -- ## List details at http://www.exim.org/mailman/listinfo/exim-users ##

[exim] Failover design with exim (slightly OT)

Jonathan Vanasco — Fri, 07 Oct 2005 18:52:22 GMT

I was talking earlier with a friend about having a failover email system providing full redundancy Ideally something like: Mailserver A port 25 (Live) delivers

Re: [exim] Trying to use expanded address list in retries

Tony Finch — Fri, 07 Oct 2005 17:42:12 GMT

... Yes. ... 32.2 Choosing which retry rule to use A domain on its own can match a domain pattern, or a pattern that starts with '*@'. Tony. --

Re: [exim] SPF and sequential exims.

David Woodhouse — Fri, 07 Oct 2005 17:34:34 GMT

... Do they not also pay you for your expertise? Is it not your responsibility to explain to them why certain options would be unwise? -- dwmw2 -- ## List

Re: [exim] Trying to use expanded address list in retries

Eli — Fri, 07 Oct 2005 17:28:51 GMT

... True, I am, and after reading 32.2 a few times, I think I can squash most of my retry rules down to just one for local domains, except I have just one more

Re: [exim] Trying to use expanded address list in retries

Tony Finch — Fri, 07 Oct 2005 17:08:43 GMT

... No, I did mean 32.2 because you seemed to be confused about how Exim chooses retry rules. It is a bit subtle and to be honest I just ignore most of the

Re: [exim] SPF and sequential exims.

j2 — Fri, 07 Oct 2005 16:50:12 GMT

... Bleeding good point. -- ## List details at http://www.exim.org/mailman/listinfo/exim-users ## Exim details at http://www.exim.org/ ## Please use the Wiki

Re: [exim] Trying to use expanded address list in retries

Eli — Fri, 07 Oct 2005 16:39:44 GMT

... 32.1 which refers to 10.18, but close enough (haha, sorry, just had to). ... I'll be damned, thanks man. I guess there's a difference to reading the docs,

Re: [exim] Trying to use expanded address list in retries

Tony Finch — Fri, 07 Oct 2005 16:25:17 GMT

... You should read section 32.2 of the spec which clarifies this. ... That is a bad way of writing addresslist local_retries = *@dbmnz;/etc/exim.host.db Tony.

Re: [exim] testing transport time rewriting

Ross Boylan — Fri, 07 Oct 2005 16:25:06 GMT

... To answer part of my own question, I specified return_path as a rewrite specification, but it's not. I'm now using headers_rewrite = *@...

[exim] Trying to use expanded address list in retries

Eli — Fri, 07 Oct 2005 15:57:52 GMT

Hey all, been a while! Anyways, I'm running in to a snag, and I don't know if there's a fix, or if I've maybe just come up with yet another item to add to the

Re: [exim] SPF and sequential exims.

Jan Johansson — Fri, 07 Oct 2005 15:53:42 GMT

... So, is it as easy as to add a host = ! statler in the ACL in question? ... Yes, I know. But a customer wants it. One of the few who actually pays me for