Re: Future shlock from the NY Times

Ramon — Sat, 02 Jan 2010 15:26:50 GMT

"It's like when you see a documentary about a movie and the action looks totally fake or the actor's line readings seem overwrought, but then you see the scene

Re: Summary of 3D systems

lincolnspector — Sat, 02 Jan 2010 01:28:43 GMT

Thanks. Much appreciated. Lincoln

Re: Future shlock from the NY Times

mbrooks_nyia — Fri, 01 Jan 2010 16:02:33 GMT

... Well, I care. Even though I prefer 35mm film, I would agree that a good digital experience is better than a bad 35mm experience and it's generally easier

Summary of 3D systems

filmformats — Thu, 31 Dec 2009 21:03:17 GMT

I'll take a stab at explaining the 3D systems. IMAX 3D uses linear polarizers, virtually idential to the ones used in theme parks and the older polarized films

Future shlock from the NY Times

bigscreenist — Thu, 31 Dec 2009 19:32:46 GMT

FILM Floating in the Digital Experience By MANOHLA DARGIS

Re: The NY Times chimes in on 3-D systems

Rick Mitchell — Thu, 31 Dec 2009 18:32:47 GMT

... Actually it hasn't here in the Los Angeles area. Except for the 3-D Expos in 2003 and 2006, there have only been occasional screenings of Fifties 3-D

Re: The last emperor and Playtime

Ramon — Thu, 31 Dec 2009 18:27:14 GMT

... Tati reportedly intentionally matted down PLAYTIME from 65mm's normal 2.2 AR to better focus the audience's attention. There's some debate as to the actual

Re: Playtime 2-track Mix

Rick Mitchell — Thu, 31 Dec 2009 18:22:07 GMT

... Tati reportedly intentionally matted down PLAYTIME from 65mm's normal 2.2 AR to better focus the audience's attention. There's some debate as to the

Re: The NY Times chimes in on 3-D systems

Ramon — Thu, 31 Dec 2009 17:45:35 GMT

The reporters, on the other hand, are guilty of not doing their homework. Early this year, I briefly covered 3D projection for The Daily Standard, and I

Re: The NY Times chimes in on 3-D systems

lincolnspector — Thu, 31 Dec 2009 17:07:41 GMT

... I'd be very shocked if Cameron has never seen a 50's 3d movie projected properly. It's not like the opportunity hasn't been available over the last 30

Re: Playtime 2-track Mix

Ramon — Thu, 31 Dec 2009 15:35:24 GMT

The European edition (at least the copy sold in Spain, which I would presume is the same as the one from the UK) of The Last Emperor comes with a 5.1 mix and

Re: More Ratings nonsense

mbrooks_nyia — Thu, 31 Dec 2009 14:59:35 GMT

... Everyone's experience is different. Aside from kiddie movies when I was younger than ten, the only film I ever remember seeing with my parents (in this

Re: The NY Times chimes in on 3-D systems

Rick Mitchell — Wed, 30 Dec 2009 18:41:11 GMT

... You'll have to ask the NY Times about that. ... Both the LA and NY Times articles were apparently written by non- technical people. Although I doubt he's

Re: More Ratings nonsense

lincolnspector — Wed, 30 Dec 2009 17:11:01 GMT

Good article. Most of it was stuff I'd already known, but a well-written and concise history is always useful. ... That doesn't match my experience, either as

Re: The NY Times chimes in on 3-D systems

lincolnspector — Wed, 30 Dec 2009 17:11:01 GMT

Thanks for the article, bigscreenist. Interesting, but it left me wondering about a few things: 1) No mention of Imax, which like RealD, uses polarized lenses.

fans_of_showmanship at Yahoo! Groups

Re: Future shlock from the NY Times

Re: Summary of 3D systems

Re: Future shlock from the NY Times

Summary of 3D systems

Future shlock from the NY Times

Re: The NY Times chimes in on 3-D systems

Re: The last emperor and Playtime

Re: Playtime 2-track Mix

Re: The NY Times chimes in on 3-D systems

Re: The NY Times chimes in on 3-D systems

Re: Playtime 2-track Mix

Re: More Ratings nonsense

Re: The NY Times chimes in on 3-D systems

Re: More Ratings nonsense

Re: The NY Times chimes in on 3-D systems