fors-discuss at Yahoo! Groups

I have achieved... "nothing"... time for a party!

merlyn@... — Sat, 24 Feb 2007 18:39:02 GMT

Back in October of 2006, I wrote: In the next few weeks, I'll be applying for clemency again, with a Democratic governor who has already granted a few pardons.

An update, and time for my supporters to think happy thoughts

merlyn@... — Tue, 10 Oct 2006 02:50:32 GMT

Apparently, I haven't sent a message to these groups since 2001. Let me bring you up to date. In the fall of 2002, I made an application for clemency with the

Re: Oregon v. Schwartz - worth a federal look?

David Keegel — Wed, 03 Apr 2002 23:56:33 GMT

] ] Put simply, the Oregon law makes any "unauthorized" "alteration" ] of a "computer" a class C felony, punishable by up to $100K in ] fines, plus

Oregon v. Schwartz - worth a federal look?

merlyn@... — Wed, 03 Apr 2002 21:44:50 GMT

[I posted this on comp.org.eff.talk and misc.legal.computing a moment ago, so my apologies if you see it twice.] [and darn it, it got swallowed by sending it

Re: [fors-announce] oregon supreme court declines to hear my case

Hans Rood — Fri, 11 Jan 2002 10:42:44 GMT

... etc. Randal I have been following your battle for nearly 8 years now. I admire your courage and determination and feel sorry taht it didn't bring you the

Re: oregon supreme court declines to hear my case

Dave Mitchell — Fri, 28 Dec 2001 13:29:55 GMT

... Randal, I think I speak for most people on this list when I say how sorry I am to hear this. It looks like a bad law is there to stay. Still, it could be

oregon supreme court declines to hear my case

merlyn@... — Sun, 23 Dec 2001 19:39:03 GMT

I just receieved a message from my lawyer that the Oregon Supreme Court has declined to hear my case, thus leaving the unfavorable Oregon Appeals Court

Re: Oregon Supreme Court petition now available

Ralf Fassel — Fri, 09 Nov 2001 09:42:22 GMT

* merlyn@... ... I am not a lawyer, but the following caught my attention: Paragraph marked `Reasons for review' (Page 5 in my printout), number 3),

Re: Oregon Supreme Court petition now available

Steve Pacenka — Thu, 08 Nov 2001 22:16:23 GMT

... It's installed @ Lightlink, on the court materials page with the appeal stuff. -- SP

Oregon Supreme Court petition now available

merlyn@... — Sat, 03 Nov 2001 22:22:42 GMT

My legal team recently filed the petition to have the Oregon Supreme Court consider reviewing my case. I've made a PDF available for the moment at:

More on the Brian West case

merlyn@... — Thu, 27 Sep 2001 15:13:49 GMT

See and . It appears that Brian was not the innocent person

Participation

larryo@... — Wed, 26 Sep 2001 16:39:15 GMT

Friends, Randal told me the other day that a number of people had asked if they could help in any way, and I talked it over with Marc and here it is: We are

Participation

larryo@... — Sat, 08 Sep 2001 01:31:21 GMT

Friends, Randal told me the other day that a number of people had asked if they could help in any way, and I talked it over with Marc and here it is: We are

Re: Hackers, Crackers, and the law

larryo@... — Fri, 07 Sep 2001 22:31:13 GMT

... That you could, if it were not for ORS 161.115(1), which provides in part: (1) If a statute defining an offense prescribes a culpable mental state but does

Re: Hackers, Crackers, and the law

merlyn@... — Tue, 04 Sep 2001 18:03:15 GMT

... R> One of the "problems" with your trial is that you should've said "NO" R> to the question: "Was this for personal gain?" . R> The way you answered that