free_energy at Yahoo! Groups

ether thruster, possible solution for space travelling

Miklós Borbás — Sat, 07 Nov 2009 06:20:02 GMT

You can find informations from possible space travelling. Informations are videos and explanation: Most important videos from these thrusters:

Fw: Re: Fw: [free_energy] Re: Fw: cosmic rays

garys_2k — Fri, 06 Nov 2009 23:58:48 GMT

The best way to make a file available is to submit it at the "Files" link, here: http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/free_energy/files You did send me a copy,

DARPA's Project PEGASUS, Part 3

William Alek — Fri, 06 Nov 2009 23:56:03 GMT

Hello all, My returning special guest this week on The PROGRESSIVE TECHNOLOGY HOUR is the President of the Mars Anomaly Research Society, Andrew D. Basiago.

Fw: Re: Fw: [free_energy] Re: Fw: cosmic rays

Kirk McLoren — Fri, 06 Nov 2009 23:55:06 GMT

... From: Vertner Vergon Subject: Re: Fw: [free_energy] Re: Fw: cosmic rays To: "Kirk McLoren" Date: Friday,

Re: Fw: cosmic rays

garys_2k — Thu, 05 Nov 2009 23:59:05 GMT

Math for what? Relativistic mass increase? There's a good discussion here, http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mass_in_special_relativity where it is correctly

Fw: Re: Fw: Re: Fw: [free_energy] Re: Fw: cosmic rays

garys_2k — Thu, 05 Nov 2009 23:33:47 GMT

Right, nice one. I suggest you provide a citation or just go away.

All Energy is Free until . . .

Wm. Scott Smith — Thu, 05 Nov 2009 18:49:51 GMT

Perpetual Motion is a straw-man argument that is used to slander every unconventional power source; nonetheless, all energy is free until someone takes it away

Re: Fw: [free_energy] Re: Fw: cosmic rays

Mr. J — Thu, 05 Nov 2009 15:02:08 GMT

You are saying that mass is velocity invariant and that it gains mass when it is accelerating. Does it have to be accelerating? Is constant speed around a

Re: Fw: cosmic rays

Charles Ford — Thu, 05 Nov 2009 14:48:35 GMT

Show us your math Charles Ford charlieford1@... ... From: garys_2k To: free_energy@yahoogroups.com Sent: Wed, November 4, 2009

Fw: Re: Fw: Re: Fw: [free_energy] Re: Fw: cosmic rays

Kirk McLoren — Thu, 05 Nov 2009 14:43:03 GMT

... From: Vertner Vergon Subject: Re: Fw: Re: Fw: [free_energy] Re: Fw: cosmic rays To: "Kirk McLoren" Date:

Re: Fw: cosmic rays

garys_2k — Thu, 05 Nov 2009 01:37:54 GMT

I think you missed the original point. The original post said that the high energy cosmic rays have to be traveling faster than light to account for the

Fw: Re: Fw: [free_energy] Re: Fw: cosmic rays

garys_2k — Thu, 05 Nov 2009 01:25:49 GMT

Care to provide a citation for that? Could you show me where "modern physicists" have dropped Relativistic mass change with respect to reference frame? Not

Fw: Re: Fw: [free_energy] Re: Fw: cosmic rays

Kirk McLoren — Thu, 05 Nov 2009 01:17:28 GMT

... From: Vertner Vergon Subject: Re: Fw: [free_energy] Re: Fw: cosmic rays To: "Kirk McLoren" Date: Wednesday, November 4, 2009, 12:43 PM ...

Re: Fw: cosmic rays

Charles Ford — Wed, 04 Nov 2009 13:56:00 GMT

Um... The mass never changed. "Relativistic Speed" is NOT magic, its just speed, speed is always relative. Always always always remember the principal of

Re: Charlie Circuit

waynegage2000 — Wed, 04 Nov 2009 11:54:43 GMT

First of all Bearden is a con man and does not know physics. His MEG is a useless piece of crap that many people have bought into. He spouts gibberish about