<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" ?>
<rss xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>fujica35mmslrs at Yahoo! Groups</title>
    <link>http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/fujica35mmslrs/</link>
    <description>Fujica 35mm SLRs - For screw mount and bayonet Fujica users</description>

    <item>
      <title>Re: az-1 and yashinon-dx 50mm 1.7</title>
      <pubDate>Sun, 25 Oct 2009 01:48:23 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>jo_lacs</dc:creator>
      <link>http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/fujica35mmslrs/message/3844</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/fujica35mmslrs/message/3844</guid>
      <description>Thank you sir for the input. joe</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: az-1 and yashinon-dx 50mm 1.7</title>
      <pubDate>Mon, 19 Oct 2009 23:48:39 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>ahudsonman@...</dc:creator>
      <link>http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/fujica35mmslrs/message/3843</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/fujica35mmslrs/message/3843</guid>
      <description>That is correct. Works fine. Bob Photos by Bob click below:_  http://www.picturetrail.com/bob40caliber_ </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: az-1 and yashinon-dx 50mm 1.7</title>
      <pubDate>Mon, 19 Oct 2009 23:31:28 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>jo_lacs</dc:creator>
      <link>http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/fujica35mmslrs/message/3842</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/fujica35mmslrs/message/3842</guid>
      <description>so no mirror contact with those bodies on your part? are those bodies bigger than an az-1?</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: az-1 and yashinon-dx 50mm 1.7</title>
      <pubDate>Mon, 19 Oct 2009 21:54:15 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>ahudsonman@...</dc:creator>
      <link>http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/fujica35mmslrs/message/3841</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/fujica35mmslrs/message/3841</guid>
      <description>I know it works on a Fujica ST605 and ST701........ Bob Photos by Bob click below:_  http://www.picturetrail.com/bob40caliber_ </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>az-1 and yashinon-dx 50mm 1.7</title>
      <pubDate>Mon, 19 Oct 2009 21:40:54 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>jo_lacs</dc:creator>
      <link>http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/fujica35mmslrs/message/3840</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/fujica35mmslrs/message/3840</guid>
      <description>hi all. has anyone tried using a 50mm yashinon on their m42 fujica? my az-1&#39;s mirror hits the rear lens element when focused to infinity during exposure. just</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Best body to get to use some X mount lenses I have?</title>
      <pubDate>Mon, 12 Oct 2009 10:21:52 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>Paolo Di Serio</dc:creator>
      <link>http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/fujica35mmslrs/message/3839</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/fujica35mmslrs/message/3839</guid>
      <description>I own an STX-2 and an AX Multi bodies, both are nice and still perfectly working. These were the latest bodies prduced by Fujca in the 80&#39;ies. STX-2 compared</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Best body to get to use some X mount lenses I have?</title>
      <pubDate>Wed, 07 Oct 2009 22:26:51 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>bill tait</dc:creator>
      <link>http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/fujica35mmslrs/message/3838</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/fujica35mmslrs/message/3838</guid>
      <description>I had a fujica atx 3  , and it was a wonderful piece . Nice feel to it  , nice meter , and great view finder . And electronic shutter . But like a fool , I</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Best body to get to use some X mount lenses I have?</title>
      <pubDate>Wed, 07 Oct 2009 16:36:11 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>mijakame</dc:creator>
      <link>http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/fujica35mmslrs/message/3837</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/fujica35mmslrs/message/3837</guid>
      <description>Although I&#39;ve spend (too) many hours web searching I still don&#39;t feel qualified to answer this question correctly - so I joined this group to see if I can get</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Hi All,  asking for 605 review</title>
      <pubDate>Tue, 06 Oct 2009 20:55:32 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>dwssr2</dc:creator>
      <link>http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/fujica35mmslrs/message/3836</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/fujica35mmslrs/message/3836</guid>
      <description>... Hi everyone,  thank you so much for your replys.  I have a few more pictures to take to finish of my first roll of film.  I am excited about getting my</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Is a Fujica MPF 105X which looks much like a 605 similar???????</title>
      <pubDate>Tue, 06 Oct 2009 19:03:02 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>Cando</dc:creator>
      <link>http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/fujica35mmslrs/message/3835</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/fujica35mmslrs/message/3835</guid>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Hi All,  asking for 605 review</title>
      <pubDate>Tue, 06 Oct 2009 17:46:25 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>BKOEPSEL1@...</dc:creator>
      <link>http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/fujica35mmslrs/message/3834</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/fujica35mmslrs/message/3834</guid>
      <description>I have a MPF 105X is it similar to the 605????? Bill (Oconomowoc Wisconisn) ... From: Deane McIntyre &lt;Deane@...&gt; To:</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Message Alert - You Have 1 Important Unread Message!</title>
      <pubDate>Tue, 06 Oct 2009 02:52:19 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>newzbkilly</dc:creator>
      <link>http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/fujica35mmslrs/message/3833</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/fujica35mmslrs/message/3833</guid>
      <description>Message Alert - You Have 1 Important Unread Message! http://adammacte.zoomshare.com/files/sexygirl.htm</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Hi All,  asking for 605 review</title>
      <pubDate>Fri, 02 Oct 2009 04:52:43 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>Deane McIntyre</dc:creator>
      <link>http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/fujica35mmslrs/message/3832</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/fujica35mmslrs/message/3832</guid>
      <description>... I have to agree that the 605 / 605N are great cameras. I have a couple of each, the last being a 605N I brought on ebay for 99 cents (plus $10 shipping) </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Hi All,  asking for 605 review</title>
      <pubDate>Fri, 02 Oct 2009 01:28:10 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>GARY PANZICA</dc:creator>
      <link>http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/fujica35mmslrs/message/3831</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/fujica35mmslrs/message/3831</guid>
      <description>I bought a 605 in I think 1979, my first SLR. By far it&#39;s the best camera I have ever owned. I even like it better then the AZ-1. I have multible lenses for it</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Hi All,  asking for 605 review</title>
      <pubDate>Fri, 02 Oct 2009 00:32:06 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>kellymjones4</dc:creator>
      <link>http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/fujica35mmslrs/message/3830</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/fujica35mmslrs/message/3830</guid>
      <description>The 605 is great. It has a nice viewfinder and is dead simple to use. I used Jon&#39;s kit to reseal. I just sorta guessed by incrementally removing the old seals</description>
    </item>

  </channel>
</rss>
<!-- wr2.grp.sp2.yahoo.com uncompressed/chunked Thu Dec 17 21:37:35 PST 2009 -->
