http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/fusebox5/ fusebox5 Sat, 21 Nov 2009 22:48:34 GMT Jason Daiger http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/fusebox5/message/4459 http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/fusebox5/message/4459 ... I have to agree that the name is important. There are a lot of folks out there that will not have any idea FuseNG is really Fusebox. We should use what Sat, 21 Nov 2009 08:40:45 GMT Kevin Roche http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/fusebox5/message/4458 http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/fusebox5/message/4458 Sean mentioned that he has some ideas for solving the issue. Here is a new thread to allow some discussion on a fix. Kevin Fri, 20 Nov 2009 21:37:33 GMT Peter Boughton http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/fusebox5/message/4457 http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/fusebox5/message/4457 This is veering into OT territory - and probably something that ... How does this compare to the Dojo Foundation's CLA? Fri, 20 Nov 2009 21:21:27 GMT Sean Corfield http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/fusebox5/message/4456 http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/fusebox5/message/4456 ... Correct, which is how FuseNG happened in the first place. ... Due to the long history associated with the Fusebox name, branding is important and "just ... Fri, 20 Nov 2009 20:37:13 GMT Peter Boughton http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/fusebox5/message/4455 http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/fusebox5/message/4455 ... Ah, actually, Apache License doesn't require re-release under a compatible license - you can use any license you like. Fri, 20 Nov 2009 20:25:39 GMT Peter Boughton http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/fusebox5/message/4454 http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/fusebox5/message/4454 Fusebox is Open Source, under the Apache license - anyone can take the code and do pretty much what they like (so long as they preserve attribution and keep Fri, 20 Nov 2009 20:12:54 GMT Seth Johnson http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/fusebox5/message/4453 http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/fusebox5/message/4453 Wouldn't Teratech have to release their rights to it for that to happen? Seth From: fusebox5@yahoogroups.com [mailto:fusebox5@yahoogroups.com] On Behalf Of Fri, 20 Nov 2009 17:10:07 GMT Jared Rypka-Hauer http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/fusebox5/message/4452 http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/fusebox5/message/4452 ...and I'm on the board. ;) I'm not sure about what would look like an "officially supported framework" when 4CFF is more concerned with application Fri, 20 Nov 2009 15:25:55 GMT Ryan J. Heldt http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/fusebox5/message/4451 http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/fusebox5/message/4451 These are all great ideas everyone! Just a few minutes ago, I contacted the 4CFF group and ask them if they would consider taking an interest in the Fusebox Fri, 20 Nov 2009 10:40:09 GMT Peter Boughton http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/fusebox5/message/4450 http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/fusebox5/message/4450 Just to point out, it doesn't need to be "someone" - there's absolutely nothing stopping a *group* of people getting together and helping to implement Fri, 20 Nov 2009 00:44:58 GMT Mike Ritchie http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/fusebox5/message/4449 http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/fusebox5/message/4449 Add one more to my wishlist: * Ability to declare fusebox.parseCircuit=true, to parseAll but constrained to a single circuit But all of this is for nothing Thu, 19 Nov 2009 22:47:34 GMT Kevin http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/fusebox5/message/4448 http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/fusebox5/message/4448 ... Adam is that code still available some place? Kevin Thu, 19 Nov 2009 15:28:29 GMT Mike Ritchie http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/fusebox5/message/4447 http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/fusebox5/message/4447 My wishlist: * Declare CFC-based circuits in fusebox.xml so you get the same path configuration abilities as XML circuits * Mix in CFC-based circuits with Thu, 19 Nov 2009 13:43:52 GMT Adam Haskell http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/fusebox5/message/4446 http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/fusebox5/message/4446 ... You could not it was all implicit, if you checked out the additions I made that I never released stable I added that ability. You just pointed to the CFC Thu, 19 Nov 2009 12:29:36 GMT Kevin http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/fusebox5/message/4445 http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/fusebox5/message/4445 ... Sean, When I tried it I could not get it to work for me. Maybe that was in a Beta as it was a long time ago. The main issue I had was that I could not work