<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" ?>
<rss xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>ggnfs at Yahoo! Groups</title>
    <link>http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/ggnfs/</link>
    <description>GGNFS</description>

    <item>
      <title>Re: lasieve windows 64Bits question</title>
      <pubDate>Fri, 06 Nov 2009 15:30:47 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>br_gladman</dc:creator>
      <link>http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/ggnfs/message/2468</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/ggnfs/message/2468</guid>
      <description>... Hello Anton I haven&#39;t tried the one you reference above but I have had trouble with earlier attempts to add inttypes.h to Visual Studio. In fact this might</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: lasieve windows 64Bits question</title>
      <pubDate>Fri, 06 Nov 2009 14:58:14 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>Anton Korobeynikov</dc:creator>
      <link>http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/ggnfs/message/2467</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/ggnfs/message/2467</guid>
      <description>Hello, Brian ... At least we need to use proper format specifiers, since &quot;unsigned long&quot; is still 32 bits on win64. I was told that stuff from </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: lasieve windows 64Bits question</title>
      <pubDate>Fri, 06 Nov 2009 14:30:55 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>br_gladman</dc:creator>
      <link>http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/ggnfs/message/2466</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/ggnfs/message/2466</guid>
      <description>... That wouldn&#39;t work for the Windows build because the Microsoft compiler doesn&#39;t support most of the C99 stuff and has no stdint.h header file.  We could</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: lasieve windows 64Bits question</title>
      <pubDate>Fri, 06 Nov 2009 12:40:31 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>Anton Korobeynikov</dc:creator>
      <link>http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/ggnfs/message/2465</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/ggnfs/message/2465</guid>
      <description>Hello, Everyone ... What was the sort of garbage seen? ... wrong. We have: printf(&quot;%d %lu %u &quot;,x,qx,ulqx); x here is of type i16_t qx - u64_t ulqx - u32_t The</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: lasieve windows 64Bits question</title>
      <pubDate>Thu, 05 Nov 2009 20:35:51 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>Jeff Gilchrist</dc:creator>
      <link>http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/ggnfs/message/2464</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/ggnfs/message/2464</guid>
      <description>... Great find, this has been updated in the SVN code so it will not longer produce that output. ... That is a very good question.  I&#39;m not sure if anyone here</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: ggnfs bianries does not work</title>
      <pubDate>Wed, 07 Oct 2009 14:49:27 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>Jeff Gilchrist</dc:creator>
      <link>http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/ggnfs/message/2463</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/ggnfs/message/2463</guid>
      <description>... The ggnfs binaries are command line tools so you can double click on them, you need to run them from either a cygwin shell or from a command prompt</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>ggnfs bianries does not work</title>
      <pubDate>Wed, 07 Oct 2009 08:56:33 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>jamal othman</dc:creator>
      <link>http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/ggnfs/message/2462</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/ggnfs/message/2462</guid>
      <description>Hi dear group ,after downlouding ggnfs 340 and extracting and downlouding  CYGWIN and install , on double clicking CYGWIN I  get a flash window only and on</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Hyperthreading slow down block Lanczos processing.</title>
      <pubDate>Sun, 04 Oct 2009 09:14:08 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>chris2be8</dc:creator>
      <link>http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/ggnfs/message/2461</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/ggnfs/message/2461</guid>
      <description>Hello, I&#39;ve tested the matrix solving step with 1 vs 2 threads on a single core CPU with hyperthreading. It runs *faster* with 1 thread than with 2. Lattice</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: expected time</title>
      <pubDate>Fri, 25 Sep 2009 15:43:23 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>chris2be8</dc:creator>
      <link>http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/ggnfs/message/2460</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/ggnfs/message/2460</guid>
      <description>... For practical purposes, infinity. See http://mersenneforum.org/showthread.php?t=12125 for a discussion of factoring a 1536 bit general number. And 2048</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>New msieve version 1.42</title>
      <pubDate>Wed, 23 Sep 2009 22:04:36 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>torbjornalm</dc:creator>
      <link>http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/ggnfs/message/2459</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/ggnfs/message/2459</guid>
      <description>Kudos to Jason for the new version. I have had a number of snfs factorings, which have bombed out immediately with the previous version. Now I started a</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Multiple CPU usage during polynomial selection</title>
      <pubDate>Wed, 23 Sep 2009 11:31:21 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>loukoume</dc:creator>
      <link>http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/ggnfs/message/2458</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/ggnfs/message/2458</guid>
      <description>... I suppose it&#39;s silly to ask, but is there any reason why polynomial selection couldn&#39;t be made to use multiple CPUs? John.</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>expected time</title>
      <pubDate>Wed, 23 Sep 2009 11:29:55 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>alfaropas</dc:creator>
      <link>http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/ggnfs/message/2457</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/ggnfs/message/2457</guid>
      <description>What is the expected time in years for factorize a number with 2048 bits with ggnfs</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Multiple CPU usage during polynomial selection</title>
      <pubDate>Fri, 18 Sep 2009 15:54:35 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>loukoume</dc:creator>
      <link>http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/ggnfs/message/2456</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/ggnfs/message/2456</guid>
      <description>... Wow.  Thanks for the speed of that reply! John.</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Multiple CPU usage during polynomial selection</title>
      <pubDate>Fri, 18 Sep 2009 15:18:33 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>Jeff Gilchrist</dc:creator>
      <link>http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/ggnfs/message/2455</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/ggnfs/message/2455</guid>
      <description>... Yes.  Polynomial selection isn&#39;t multi-threaded so only one gets used. All 8 will get used for sieving and some parts of the post-processing as well. Jeff.</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Multiple CPU usage during polynomial selection</title>
      <pubDate>Fri, 18 Sep 2009 15:09:08 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>loukoume</dc:creator>
      <link>http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/ggnfs/message/2454</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/ggnfs/message/2454</guid>
      <description>I&#39;ve set everything up under Ubuntu on an 8 core machine based on Jeff&#39;s page and I&#39;ve started testing using the sample number he provides. The system is</description>
    </item>

  </channel>
</rss>
<!-- wr1.grp.sp2.yahoo.com uncompressed/chunked Sat Nov  7 21:33:29 PST 2009 -->
