gnosticism2 at Yahoo! Groups

Re: citation

will brown — Fri, 20 Nov 2009 19:57:07 GMT

Thanks, Cari, that is surely close enough. I shall peruse the G of P to get a taste of the context... willy

Re: citation

lady_caritas — Fri, 20 Nov 2009 14:29:03 GMT

... Hello, Willy. Are you asking where your quote came from or rather what ancient writing it is referring to? In any case, it would be helpful to have a bit

citation

will brown — Thu, 19 Nov 2009 18:49:40 GMT

Hi Cari; could you, or any of the other denizens of this group, provide me a 'where did this come from' answer. Thanks, willy << One of the Nag Hammadi Codices

Pike

Greg Hemmings — Tue, 17 Nov 2009 00:41:28 GMT

Hello all! I have found, in my scant recent research, Albert Pike to be quite fascinating. His view of Gnosticism/religion and his involvement with Free

A Dictionary of Gnosticism & 'The Gnostic' 2 all Weekend on Aeon Byt

miguelconner — Sat, 14 Nov 2009 19:37:00 GMT

For the first time in history a comprehensive lexicon on Gnostic terminology has been published. More than a dictionary, it is perennial almanac and

Re: First thought:: Gnosticism, Masonry

esapress@... — Sat, 14 Nov 2009 19:33:23 GMT

Cari, Mark, I've also been enjoying this discussion, and I'm very much looking forward to reading Pike more thoroughly; at the moment though I'm in the process

Re: First thought:: Gnosticism, Masonry

lady_caritas — Sat, 14 Nov 2009 15:17:52 GMT

... Mark, your contributions are always welcome. Thank you for your effort. I'll have to do a bit more reading in this area myself. Perhaps someone will pick

Re: First thought:: Gnosticism, Masonry

Mark — Sat, 14 Nov 2009 04:30:43 GMT

Cari, I wish I had something more to add to this conversation. There was something about the rhetoric in this thread that seemed to "dangle." Kind of like "a

Re: First thought:: Gnosticism, Masonry

lady_caritas — Sat, 07 Nov 2009 19:07:10 GMT

Mark, thank you very much for the references. Yes, it does appear that even without the benefit of the later Nag Hammadi findings, Albert Pike did have some

Re: First thought:: Gnosticism, Masonry

Mark — Thu, 05 Nov 2009 17:50:55 GMT

Cari, I was curious to see what Pike wrote related to this forum, and found the following: "To Philo the Jew, as to the Gnostics, the Supreme Being was the

Re: Gnosticism/Masonry

esapress@... — Sun, 01 Nov 2009 01:55:55 GMT

Greg, I'm really enjoying this conversation; and while I've never really thought about why a/o how it was that we (Masons and myself, for example) could have

Re: Gnosticism/Masonry

Hammer — Sat, 31 Oct 2009 01:02:53 GMT

Terrie, I am sure, from the brief communications we have had, that I can understand why they would want you to take part in the conversation and discussion of

Re: First thought:: Gnosticism, Masonry

lady_caritas — Sat, 31 Oct 2009 00:54:38 GMT

... Terrie, that is fine, of course. I've been reading everyone's contributions, and I'd be interested to know if anyone has read Pike's take on this "Supreme

Gnosticism, Mansonry, (Note)

esapress@... — Sat, 31 Oct 2009 00:32:49 GMT

Just a note to add, Greg. You alluded to 'friction' as say between Atheists and Masons as an example no doubt (so on and on,) perhaps, because of each'

First thought:: Gnosticism, Masonry

esapress@... — Sat, 31 Oct 2009 00:31:48 GMT

Typically, I think it's safe to say that I tend to keep my faith/beliefs pertaining to is/is not a supreme being/creator/god, so on, to myself. Feels private,