gospel_of_john at Yahoo! Groups

action in the temple John 2

William Skelton — Mon, 18 Feb 2013 05:15:15 GMT

Leaving aside the question of the timing of the Lord's action in temple what can we say about what He was trying to accomplish by doing what He did? Jewish

Re: First Letter Attributed to John

David Hall — Mon, 11 Feb 2013 16:15:38 GMT

I agree with you John. The authorities would have tried to eliminate Jesus after he challenged their authority to sell sacrificial animals in the temple.

Re: First Letter Attributed to John

johnestaton — Mon, 11 Feb 2013 09:30:08 GMT

Certainly, Jesus may have said the words about destroying the temple and raising it up early, and John records the temple cleansing here so as to group

Re: First Letter Attributed to John

William Skelton — Mon, 11 Feb 2013 00:53:40 GMT

Hi Folks Please ignore my reference to Jeremiah. I was confusing the reference with something else. ... From: William Skelton Subject:

Re: First Letter Attributed to John

William Skelton — Sun, 10 Feb 2013 18:18:26 GMT

John et al Raymond Brown had an interesting idea that Jesus may have made His prophetic statements in the early time frame that John ascribes (the

Re: First Letter Attributed to John

johnestaton — Sun, 10 Feb 2013 11:54:27 GMT

My memory sometimes confuses Martin Hengel's "The Johannine Question" and Richard Bauckham's "Jesus and the Eyewitnesses", but one of them argues, quite

Re: First Letter Attributed to John

David Hall — Sat, 09 Feb 2013 22:46:02 GMT

I think we have something that may have been altered during copying. In the Fourth Gospel Jesus went to Jerusalem to cast out the money changers changing

Re: First Letter Attributed to John

Emory Davis, Jr — Sat, 09 Feb 2013 22:19:57 GMT

It is the "polishing" of ideas in the 4G that seem more likely than anything else. I'll go with that. Emory ... [Non-text portions of this message have been

Re: First Letter Attributed to John

William Skelton — Sat, 09 Feb 2013 21:10:40 GMT

Hengel's theory sounds plausible. Bill ... From: johnestaton Subject: [Gosp_John] Re: First Letter Attributed to John To:

Re: First Letter Attributed to John

Emory Davis, Jr — Thu, 07 Feb 2013 16:02:22 GMT

Hello John, good to hear from you after some time. I agree that the Epistle were the "inter-office memo" constructed to take care of an immediate situation.

Re: First Letter Attributed to John

johnestaton — Thu, 07 Feb 2013 09:32:21 GMT

Hi, Emory, I like the position of the late Martin Hengel, which allows one to have one's cake and eat it! Professor Hengel suggested the Gospel was the fruit

Re: First Letter Attributed to John

Emory Davis, Jr — Thu, 07 Feb 2013 02:35:09 GMT

Matt, long time. I shifted ISP to Gmail so I lost some time. It happened that our Sr. Pastor was doing an overview of the Epistles and I got the sense, right

Re: First Letter Attributed to John

Matthew — Thu, 07 Feb 2013 01:58:13 GMT

Hello Emory, From my own studies, I believe that the gospel of John was written first and then the letters. I base this opinion on the symbolic meaning of

First Letter Attributed to John

Emory Davis, Jr — Wed, 06 Feb 2013 18:54:34 GMT

I have been doing some study and rereading of the I John and I think we talked about this as much as a couple of years ago but, was there any conversation as

I'm Back

Emory Davis, Jr — Wed, 02 Jan 2013 02:26:36 GMT

To all, this is Emory Davis. I was finally able to facilitate access through my new email address. Looking forward to a blessed year and good discussion. Rev