<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" ?>
<rss xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>hercules-advocacy at Yahoo! Groups</title>
    <link>http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/hercules-advocacy/</link>
    <description>Hercules advocacy</description>

    <item>
      <title>Re: What Are the Chances That CICS/VS will Be Available for DOS/VS U</title>
      <pubDate>Sat, 24 Oct 2009 18:14:47 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>Harold Grovesteen</dc:creator>
      <link>http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/hercules-advocacy/message/822</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/hercules-advocacy/message/822</guid>
      <description>... No, they did not destroy the software.  They still need to be able to prove they copyrighted it.  Particularly for older software.  At one point</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: What Are the Chances That CICS/VS will Be Available for DOS/VS U</title>
      <pubDate>Sat, 24 Oct 2009 17:13:22 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>Harold Grovesteen</dc:creator>
      <link>http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/hercules-advocacy/message/821</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/hercules-advocacy/message/821</guid>
      <description>http://www.copyright.gov/circs/circ1a.html http://www.copyright.gov/title17/92preface.html This link identifies that copyright protections were extended to </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: What Are the Chances That CICS/VS will Be Available for DOS/VS U</title>
      <pubDate>Sat, 24 Oct 2009 16:00:54 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>dosvsoperator</dc:creator>
      <link>http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/hercules-advocacy/message/820</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/hercules-advocacy/message/820</guid>
      <description>Thanks, Jay! It is an honor to address you, sir! :) I did not know this! I always thought IBM owned the rights to these OSes and for whatever reason decided to</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: What Are the Chances That CICS/VS will Be Available for DOS/VS U</title>
      <pubDate>Sat, 24 Oct 2009 12:26:01 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>Jay Maynard</dc:creator>
      <link>http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/hercules-advocacy/message/819</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/hercules-advocacy/message/819</guid>
      <description>(Please trim your quotes. Thanks.) ... They wren&#39;t released to the public domain. They were never copyrighted to begin with. Before 1978 in the US, anything</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: What Are the Chances That CICS/VS will Be Available for DOS/VS U</title>
      <pubDate>Sat, 24 Oct 2009 11:49:23 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>dosvsoperator</dc:creator>
      <link>http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/hercules-advocacy/message/818</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/hercules-advocacy/message/818</guid>
      <description>Just one question: How then did we end up seeing DOS/360, DOS/VS, OS/MFT, OS/MVT, MVS 3.8j, et al. released to the public domain (Thank G-d and IBM for</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: What Are the Chances That CICS/VS will Be Available for DOS/VS U</title>
      <pubDate>Fri, 23 Oct 2009 07:08:55 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>Dave Wade</dc:creator>
      <link>http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/hercules-advocacy/message/817</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/hercules-advocacy/message/817</guid>
      <description>... hobby license would be a good thing for IBM, even &gt;for their current products. I&#39;m sure that many new people would be attracted to the architecture, if</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: What Are the Chances That CICS/VS will Be Available for DOS/VS U</title>
      <pubDate>Fri, 23 Oct 2009 04:09:54 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>BruceTSmith</dc:creator>
      <link>http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/hercules-advocacy/message/816</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/hercules-advocacy/message/816</guid>
      <description>Hi Fish, I guess I agree with you guys, if we&#39;re talking about older z hardware, and even 390/ESA systems. But something like the 25 year old VSE/SP is a</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: What Are the Chances That CICS/VS will Be Available for DOS/VS U</title>
      <pubDate>Thu, 22 Oct 2009 09:28:56 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>Fish</dc:creator>
      <link>http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/hercules-advocacy/message/815</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/hercules-advocacy/message/815</guid>
      <description>... Hash: SHA1 (Thread moved from [H390-DOSVS] to here) ... [...] ... I think Dave has hit the nail on the head: the elimination of the &quot;after-market&quot; market</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Does anyone know what happened to Greg Smith?</title>
      <pubDate>Sat, 10 Oct 2009 10:22:52 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>Fish</dc:creator>
      <link>http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/hercules-advocacy/message/814</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/hercules-advocacy/message/814</guid>
      <description>... Hash: SHA1 Folks, I&#39;m beginning to become more than a little concerned about my inability to establish contact with Greg Smith. I&#39;m beginning to fear </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: ** ANNOUNCEMENT ** HercPrt v1.1.0 has been released</title>
      <pubDate>Sun, 04 Oct 2009 04:04:24 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>Fish</dc:creator>
      <link>http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/hercules-advocacy/message/813</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/hercules-advocacy/message/813</guid>
      <description>... Hash: SHA1 It has been reported to me that the donation link I provided in my email ... I&#39;ve recreated the link. It&#39;s now: http://tinyurl.com/ycr3bpy I</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>HHCPR002E Invalid argument for printer 000E: sockdev</title>
      <pubDate>Sun, 04 Oct 2009 03:39:21 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>Fish</dc:creator>
      <link>http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/hercules-advocacy/message/812</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/hercules-advocacy/message/812</guid>
      <description>... Hash: SHA1 DANG IT!  Sending again with NON-BLANK SUBJECT LINE...  (Sorry about that folks) ... Too late! I already entered it into my SpamGenerator</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>** ANNOUNCEMENT ** HercPrt v1.1.0 has been released</title>
      <pubDate>Fri, 02 Oct 2009 18:21:33 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>Fish</dc:creator>
      <link>http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/hercules-advocacy/message/811</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/hercules-advocacy/message/811</guid>
      <description>... Hash: SHA1 I am pleased to announce the release of a new softdevlabs.com product called HercPrt. In return I am asking that you PLEASE MAKE A DONATION. I</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>PING!</title>
      <pubDate>Fri, 19 Jun 2009 11:20:39 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>Fish</dc:creator>
      <link>http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/hercules-advocacy/message/810</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/hercules-advocacy/message/810</guid>
      <description>... Hash: SHA1 Ping! (Having email issues. This is a test. Please DO NOT respond!) - -- &quot;Fish&quot; (David B. Trout) - fish@... Fight Spam! Join CAUCE!</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Legally Running z/OS on Hercules</title>
      <pubDate>Wed, 04 Mar 2009 15:54:35 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>laddiehanus</dc:creator>
      <link>http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/hercules-advocacy/message/809</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/hercules-advocacy/message/809</guid>
      <description>... When I worked at IBM many years ago customer data was confidential. Any IBM&#39;er responding to this would probably become an ex-IBM&#39;er. Laddie</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Legally Running z/OS on Hercules</title>
      <pubDate>Wed, 04 Mar 2009 08:53:31 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>Dave Wade</dc:creator>
      <link>http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/hercules-advocacy/message/808</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/hercules-advocacy/message/808</guid>
      <description>I sometimes think that IBM invented the &quot;NDR&quot; (non-disclosure agreement) but I expect that any legal use of zOS, zVM or zVSE, be it within IBM or by a </description>
    </item>

  </channel>
</rss>
<!-- wr2.grp.sp2.yahoo.com uncompressed/chunked Fri Dec 18 12:30:17 PST 2009 -->
