<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" ?>
<rss xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>human_superhuman at Yahoo! Groups</title>
    <link>http://groups.yahoo.com/group/human_superhuman/</link>
    <description>Sauwelian-Lampertian Nietzsche Group</description>

    <item>
      <title>Re: The Alpha of Nietzsche&#39;s Philosophy.</title>
      <pubDate>Mon, 01 Feb 2010 18:23:01 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>Sauwelios</dc:creator>
      <link>http://groups.yahoo.com/group/human_superhuman/message/472</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://groups.yahoo.com/group/human_superhuman/message/472</guid>
      <description>... This is essential: superstition is an indispensable ingredient if one is to have the idea that follows. one would ... This is interpretation, of course:</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: The Alpha of Nietzsche&#39;s Philosophy.</title>
      <pubDate>Mon, 01 Feb 2010 13:08:12 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>Moody</dc:creator>
      <link>http://groups.yahoo.com/group/human_superhuman/message/471</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://groups.yahoo.com/group/human_superhuman/message/471</guid>
      <description>Nietzsche made a very important statement about inspiration in that most crucial work for Nietzsche-interpretation, Ecce Homo. Here Nietzsche was reviewing his</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: The Alpha of Nietzsche&#39;s Philosophy.</title>
      <pubDate>Sat, 30 Jan 2010 20:09:00 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>Sauwelios</dc:creator>
      <link>http://groups.yahoo.com/group/human_superhuman/message/470</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://groups.yahoo.com/group/human_superhuman/message/470</guid>
      <description>... Of course, we do not have to *believe* Nietzsche when he says he is at bottom healthy. He does, however, strictly distinguish between healthy and decadent:</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: The Alpha of Nietzsche&#39;s Philosophy.</title>
      <pubDate>Sat, 30 Jan 2010 09:23:08 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>Moody</dc:creator>
      <link>http://groups.yahoo.com/group/human_superhuman/message/469</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://groups.yahoo.com/group/human_superhuman/message/469</guid>
      <description>Nietzsche&#39;s own succumbing to a chronic illness shows that he did not &#39;resolve&#39; this contradiction; he was - and remained - ill/healthy. The passage you quote</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: The Alpha of Nietzsche&#39;s Philosophy.</title>
      <pubDate>Fri, 29 Jan 2010 18:21:32 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>Sauwelios</dc:creator>
      <link>http://groups.yahoo.com/group/human_superhuman/message/468</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://groups.yahoo.com/group/human_superhuman/message/468</guid>
      <description>... That is the opening sentence of section 2, in which he immediately goes on to explain this seeming contradiction &#39;away&#39;, i.e., to resolve it: &quot;Agreed that</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: The Alpha of Nietzsche&#39;s Philosophy.</title>
      <pubDate>Fri, 29 Jan 2010 08:27:23 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>Moody</dc:creator>
      <link>http://groups.yahoo.com/group/human_superhuman/message/467</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://groups.yahoo.com/group/human_superhuman/message/467</guid>
      <description>&quot;Agreed that I am a decadent, I am also the very reverse.&quot; [Friedrich Nietzsche, Ecce Homo, &#39;Why I Am So Wise&#39;, 2] I think your latest &#39;Lampertian&#39; trend is a</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: The Alpha of Nietzsche&#39;s Philosophy.</title>
      <pubDate>Thu, 28 Jan 2010 20:17:55 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>Sauwelios</dc:creator>
      <link>http://groups.yahoo.com/group/human_superhuman/message/466</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://groups.yahoo.com/group/human_superhuman/message/466</guid>
      <description>My comments below. ... Yes, please do. For what is revealed (&quot;apparent&quot;) to you isn&#39;t revealed to *me*, apparently. ... I *do* seek to get a good picture of</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: The Alpha of Nietzsche&#39;s Philosophy.</title>
      <pubDate>Thu, 28 Jan 2010 09:04:32 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>Moody</dc:creator>
      <link>http://groups.yahoo.com/group/human_superhuman/message/465</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://groups.yahoo.com/group/human_superhuman/message/465</guid>
      <description>I think that Nietzsche actively phiolosophised via contradictions. This is not just apparent across the development of his work but even in single works - nay,</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: The Alpha of Nietzsche&#39;s Philosophy.</title>
      <pubDate>Wed, 27 Jan 2010 11:39:38 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>Sauwelios</dc:creator>
      <link>http://groups.yahoo.com/group/human_superhuman/message/464</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://groups.yahoo.com/group/human_superhuman/message/464</guid>
      <description>Frankly, I find such remarks about contradictions in Nietzsche&#39;s philosophy sledge-hammer arguments (and I don&#39;t think one can philosophise with a</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: The Alpha of Nietzsche&#39;s Philosophy.</title>
      <pubDate>Wed, 27 Jan 2010 07:48:04 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>Moody</dc:creator>
      <link>http://groups.yahoo.com/group/human_superhuman/message/463</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://groups.yahoo.com/group/human_superhuman/message/463</guid>
      <description>Even if the claim that &quot;the world is will to power and nothing else besides&quot;  is considered to be an undogmatic, uncertain hypothesis, it still cannot be</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: The Alpha of Nietzsche&#39;s Philosophy.</title>
      <pubDate>Tue, 26 Jan 2010 21:56:37 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>Sauwelios</dc:creator>
      <link>http://groups.yahoo.com/group/human_superhuman/message/462</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://groups.yahoo.com/group/human_superhuman/message/462</guid>
      <description>I agree, but I think what you say about archai only applies to *dogmatic* archê-claims. As Lampert emphasises (see the new Group Description), the</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: The Alpha of Nietzsche&#39;s Philosophy.</title>
      <pubDate>Tue, 26 Jan 2010 08:49:33 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>Moody</dc:creator>
      <link>http://groups.yahoo.com/group/human_superhuman/message/461</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://groups.yahoo.com/group/human_superhuman/message/461</guid>
      <description>Thanks for raising this again. For me, a Perspective [P] always suggests that there is &#39;something else besides&#39; the P. There must be other Ps, just as there</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: The Alpha of Nietzsche&#39;s Philosophy.</title>
      <pubDate>Sun, 24 Jan 2010 20:55:21 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>Sauwelios</dc:creator>
      <link>http://groups.yahoo.com/group/human_superhuman/message/460</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://groups.yahoo.com/group/human_superhuman/message/460</guid>
      <description>In *TSZ*, the Overman is the Alpha (taught already in the Prologue), the Eternal Recurrence the Omega (&#39;officially&#39; embraced in the final seven of the book&#39;s</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: The Alpha of Nietzsche&#39;s Philosophy.</title>
      <pubDate>Wed, 20 Jan 2010 20:56:03 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>Sauwelios</dc:creator>
      <link>http://groups.yahoo.com/group/human_superhuman/message/459</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://groups.yahoo.com/group/human_superhuman/message/459</guid>
      <description>I forgot to mention my most telling discovery regarding *WP* 569. Before I mention it, however, let me first qualify my remark about the manuscript. I have not</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>The Alpha of Nietzsche&#39;s Philosophy.</title>
      <pubDate>Wed, 20 Jan 2010 13:32:47 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>Sauwelios</dc:creator>
      <link>http://groups.yahoo.com/group/human_superhuman/message/458</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://groups.yahoo.com/group/human_superhuman/message/458</guid>
      <description>When I created this Group, I thought the great human being---under whatever monicker, whether &quot;genius&quot; or &quot;Overman&quot;---was the Alpha and Omega of Nietzsche&#39;s</description>
    </item>

  </channel>
</rss>
<!-- wr2.grp.sp2.yahoo.com uncompressed/chunked Sun Mar 28 16:46:11 PDT 2010 -->
