<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" ?>
<rss xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>human_superhuman at Yahoo! Groups</title>
    <link>http://groups.yahoo.com/group/human_superhuman/</link>
    <description>Suprahumanism.</description>

    <item>
      <title>Re: Nietzsche&#39;s early metaphysics, again.</title>
      <pubDate>Mon, 23 Nov 2009 15:27:20 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>Sauwelios</dc:creator>
      <link>http://groups.yahoo.com/group/human_superhuman/message/454</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://groups.yahoo.com/group/human_superhuman/message/454</guid>
      <description>The reason the above two posts are so short, is that something struck me while writing them---the same thing in both cases. If I have understood him correctly,</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Nietzsche&#39;s early metaphysics, again.</title>
      <pubDate>Wed, 18 Nov 2009 13:33:14 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>Sauwelios</dc:creator>
      <link>http://groups.yahoo.com/group/human_superhuman/message/453</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://groups.yahoo.com/group/human_superhuman/message/453</guid>
      <description>... I see I have not been consistent in capitalising the word &quot;it&quot; when referring to the Primordial One. I think it is clear in the above, though. I also think</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Nietzsche&#39;s early metaphysics, again.</title>
      <pubDate>Mon, 16 Nov 2009 17:31:41 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>Sauwelios</dc:creator>
      <link>http://groups.yahoo.com/group/human_superhuman/message/452</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://groups.yahoo.com/group/human_superhuman/message/452</guid>
      <description>In the last two weeks or so, I have hardly read anything. And I have found that Nietzsche was right: not reading (i.e., not hearing others think) allows one&#39;s</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>The Order of Rank Among Nietzsche&#39;s Books.</title>
      <pubDate>Wed, 04 Nov 2009 13:00:00 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>Sauwelios</dc:creator>
      <link>http://groups.yahoo.com/group/human_superhuman/message/451</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://groups.yahoo.com/group/human_superhuman/message/451</guid>
      <description>Last night, in the course of one of my current projects---to understand *Beyond Good and Evil* as completely as possible for me (by reading Lampert&#39;s</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: The Plato-Nietzsche Cycle: Introduction.</title>
      <pubDate>Sun, 01 Nov 2009 18:15:55 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>Sauwelios</dc:creator>
      <link>http://groups.yahoo.com/group/human_superhuman/message/450</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://groups.yahoo.com/group/human_superhuman/message/450</guid>
      <description>... Correction: &#39;The difference is that in the latter case, one seeks to STAMP &quot;what is most personal&quot; in one&#39;s suffering on all things, whereas in the former</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: The Plato-Nietzsche Cycle: Introduction.</title>
      <pubDate>Sun, 01 Nov 2009 17:49:20 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>Sauwelios</dc:creator>
      <link>http://groups.yahoo.com/group/human_superhuman/message/449</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://groups.yahoo.com/group/human_superhuman/message/449</guid>
      <description>... I think both the urge beyond oneself and the urge back to oneself (eros and thanatos, Shiva and Vishnu, art and truth) are at bottom the will to power: the</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Nietzsche&#39;s Stance toward System. An essay in the literal sense.</title>
      <pubDate>Thu, 29 Oct 2009 00:05:38 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>Sauwelios</dc:creator>
      <link>http://groups.yahoo.com/group/human_superhuman/message/448</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://groups.yahoo.com/group/human_superhuman/message/448</guid>
      <description>Thank you for you---suggestion. I was thinking of using this first essay as the introductory essay to a bundle of essays on Nietzsche. The second essay,</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Nietzsche&#39;s Stance toward System. An essay in the literal sense.</title>
      <pubDate>Sat, 24 Oct 2009 20:51:17 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>perpetualburn52</dc:creator>
      <link>http://groups.yahoo.com/group/human_superhuman/message/447</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://groups.yahoo.com/group/human_superhuman/message/447</guid>
      <description>... Sauwelios, ever think about putting all this stuff together and writing a book?  Congratulations on getting engaged, btw. Would will to a system(unnatural)</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Nietzsche&#39;s Stance toward System. An essay in the literal sense.</title>
      <pubDate>Thu, 22 Oct 2009 21:43:11 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>Sauwelios</dc:creator>
      <link>http://groups.yahoo.com/group/human_superhuman/message/446</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://groups.yahoo.com/group/human_superhuman/message/446</guid>
      <description>Written on October 21, 2009. In [i]Twilight of the Idols[/i], Nietzsche says: &quot;I mistrust all systematisers and I avoid them. The will to system is a lack of</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Greetings</title>
      <pubDate>Sun, 18 Oct 2009 20:18:44 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>Sauwelios</dc:creator>
      <link>http://groups.yahoo.com/group/human_superhuman/message/445</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://groups.yahoo.com/group/human_superhuman/message/445</guid>
      <description>... I largely agree with the Dutch Nietzschean Menno ter Braak, who conceived National Socialism as a doctrine of rancor (or ressentiment). I think</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Greetings</title>
      <pubDate>Sat, 17 Oct 2009 23:40:53 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>perpetualburn52</dc:creator>
      <link>http://groups.yahoo.com/group/human_superhuman/message/444</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://groups.yahoo.com/group/human_superhuman/message/444</guid>
      <description>... I find a lot of these &quot;pro&quot; white groups only increase tension and push a potential crisis to the foreground faster(which may very well be a good thing).</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Fragment of an advanced form of The Birth of Tragedy, paragraphs</title>
      <pubDate>Sat, 17 Oct 2009 22:54:31 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>Sauwelios</dc:creator>
      <link>http://groups.yahoo.com/group/human_superhuman/message/443</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://groups.yahoo.com/group/human_superhuman/message/443</guid>
      <description>... It&#39;s not just that the individual&#39;s visions are images of images of Being, instead of merely images of Being, but that the former are &quot;wholly Outside&quot;,</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Fragment of an advanced form of The Birth of Tragedy, paragraphs</title>
      <pubDate>Sat, 17 Oct 2009 17:33:28 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>Sauwelios</dc:creator>
      <link>http://groups.yahoo.com/group/human_superhuman/message/442</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://groups.yahoo.com/group/human_superhuman/message/442</guid>
      <description>I think I may understand Nietzsche&#39;s early metaphysics [NEM] now. First off, the Primordial One is not transcendent, but immanent. It does not have &#39;Being&#39; in</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Fragment of an advanced form of The Birth of Tragedy, paragraphs</title>
      <pubDate>Fri, 16 Oct 2009 22:39:38 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>Sauwelios</dc:creator>
      <link>http://groups.yahoo.com/group/human_superhuman/message/441</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://groups.yahoo.com/group/human_superhuman/message/441</guid>
      <description>... I am now reading the Nachlass of 1869-71, with the aim of fathoming Nietzsche&#39;s early metaphysics. I&#39;ve come across a note that explains how &quot;the genius is</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Greetings</title>
      <pubDate>Fri, 16 Oct 2009 21:57:46 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>Sauwelios</dc:creator>
      <link>http://groups.yahoo.com/group/human_superhuman/message/440</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://groups.yahoo.com/group/human_superhuman/message/440</guid>
      <description>I accidentally wrote &quot;simple&quot; instead of &quot;simply&quot;. Also, my presentation is perhaps too rigorous. Historical relativism (HR) views all views as conditioned by</description>
    </item>

  </channel>
</rss>
<!-- wr1.grp.sp2.yahoo.com uncompressed/chunked Wed Jan  6 09:27:36 PST 2010 -->
