<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" ?>
<rss xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>ieuga at Yahoo! Groups</title>
    <link>http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/ieuga/</link>
    <description>Expandable Users Group</description>

    <item>
      <title>Re: Good point and bad points of Expandable</title>
      <pubDate>Sat, 17 Oct 2009 21:37:23 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>wm.cowley@...</dc:creator>
      <link>http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/ieuga/message/333</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/ieuga/message/333</guid>
      <description>Mark, My first Expandable implementation was in 1991.  Since that time I have implemented Expandable many times, both as a user and as a consultant.  I have</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Good point and bad points of Expandable</title>
      <pubDate>Fri, 16 Oct 2009 21:18:37 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>Jeff Binkley</dc:creator>
      <link>http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/ieuga/message/332</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/ieuga/message/332</guid>
      <description>We have been on Expandable since March 2005.  It has been a good partnership.  We stepped up from an in-house inventory system utilizing Peachtree for</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Good point and bad points of Expandable</title>
      <pubDate>Fri, 16 Oct 2009 20:13:34 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>Robert Amalfitano</dc:creator>
      <link>http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/ieuga/message/331</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/ieuga/message/331</guid>
      <description>Jon,   If you are on version 8.1.3 or lower you are correct.   However, our current version 8.4 has the capability of top level pegging.  You can enter a</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Good point and bad points of Expandable</title>
      <pubDate>Fri, 16 Oct 2009 20:12:00 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>Laura White</dc:creator>
      <link>http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/ieuga/message/330</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/ieuga/message/330</guid>
      <description>Mark,   We have been on Expandable since October 2004 and love the system.  As the name states the system is Expandable. They have many programs that can</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Good point and bad points of Expandable</title>
      <pubDate>Fri, 16 Oct 2009 20:09:18 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>Tony Lum</dc:creator>
      <link>http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/ieuga/message/329</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/ieuga/message/329</guid>
      <description>Jon, We are in the process in integrating Expandable Alerts which I believe will help solve your problem.  It is a standalone program which runs on the</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Good point and bad points of Expandable</title>
      <pubDate>Fri, 16 Oct 2009 19:48:50 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>Tony Lum</dc:creator>
      <link>http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/ieuga/message/328</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/ieuga/message/328</guid>
      <description>Hi Mark, We&#39;ve been using Expandable since 1988 at the Ascor subsidiary and it has been extremely reliable for us.  We now run the entire corporation on it</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Good point and bad points of Expandable</title>
      <pubDate>Fri, 16 Oct 2009 19:39:13 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>Jon Heiner</dc:creator>
      <link>http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/ieuga/message/327</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/ieuga/message/327</guid>
      <description>Proteus Industries has used Expandable for over two decades and, as this length of time suggests, we are quite satisfied.  As I recall, we were somewhere</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>APIs</title>
      <pubDate>Fri, 16 Oct 2009 19:19:13 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>bswedroe</dc:creator>
      <link>http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/ieuga/message/326</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/ieuga/message/326</guid>
      <description>The API point is definitely valid. However, one of the key things about Expandable is that we do listen to our customers and adding API&#39;s is a commitment that</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Good point and bad points of Expandable</title>
      <pubDate>Fri, 16 Oct 2009 19:04:33 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>Emily Tsang</dc:creator>
      <link>http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/ieuga/message/325</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/ieuga/message/325</guid>
      <description>It is still probably the best choice out there, at least for us.  Its basic ERP functionality is very good, and inventory and job tracking is easy and</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Good point and bad points of Expandable</title>
      <pubDate>Fri, 16 Oct 2009 18:47:24 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>Jonathan Borden</dc:creator>
      <link>http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/ieuga/message/323</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/ieuga/message/323</guid>
      <description>I agree that having no easy way to import data into expandable has been a problem for us as well.  We have also had problems with scheduling of job tickets</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Good point and bad points of Expandable</title>
      <pubDate>Fri, 16 Oct 2009 18:36:59 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>Alison Austefjord</dc:creator>
      <link>http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/ieuga/message/322</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/ieuga/message/322</guid>
      <description>By the way, I would be happy to expand on this a bit more and give you more feedback.  I understand that Expandable does plan to release more APIs in the</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Good point and bad points of Expandable</title>
      <pubDate>Fri, 16 Oct 2009 17:56:07 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>Alison Austefjord</dc:creator>
      <link>http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/ieuga/message/321</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/ieuga/message/321</guid>
      <description>One of the largest downsides for Occam Networks is that the system is not extensible.  There are no APIs available (except one-way to Salesforce.com) so if you</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Good point and bad points of Expandable</title>
      <pubDate>Fri, 16 Oct 2009 12:40:51 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>Mark Romboli</dc:creator>
      <link>http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/ieuga/message/280</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/ieuga/message/280</guid>
      <description>Hello there We are looking into purchasing Expandable, we went through a 4-hour demo this week, while they showed us all the good points and what we wanted to </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Use of WinBatch to automate running reports</title>
      <pubDate>Wed, 07 Oct 2009 22:13:04 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>Dominique</dc:creator>
      <link>http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/ieuga/message/279</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/ieuga/message/279</guid>
      <description>I agree that sometimes you do have to build in timedelays. However, splitting the &quot;~&quot; from the report name has proven pretty solid for me. As follows: </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Use of WinBatch to automate running reports</title>
      <pubDate>Wed, 07 Oct 2009 01:39:59 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>Osher Yam</dc:creator>
      <link>http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/ieuga/message/278</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/ieuga/message/278</guid>
      <description>Jon, Once you opened the reports screen you need to use the down arrow and tab to get where you want to go. Let me know if works for you. Osher The Warrell</description>
    </item>

  </channel>
</rss>
<!-- wr1.grp.sp2.yahoo.com uncompressed/chunked Mon Nov  9 02:29:52 PST 2009 -->
