http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/iolanguage/ Io Sun, 15 Nov 2009 08:41:57 GMT Mike Austin http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/iolanguage/message/11915 http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/iolanguage/message/11915 ... Thanks Steve, it's working. I'm playing around with state driven code, and it seems like it can be done: Buffer := Object clone do( full := clone init := Sat, 14 Nov 2009 22:23:02 GMT Steve Dekorte http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/iolanguage/message/11914 http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/iolanguage/message/11914 ... A block has to be called with the "call" method. I think what you want is: Test := Object clone do( init := method( self setIsActivatable(true) ) activate Sat, 14 Nov 2009 18:36:31 GMT Mike Austin http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/iolanguage/message/11913 http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/iolanguage/message/11913 ... I changed it to use block() and I do see different behavior - nothing happens at all now :) Test := Object clone do( init := method( self Sat, 14 Nov 2009 08:06:15 GMT Jeremy Tregunna http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/iolanguage/message/11912 http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/iolanguage/message/11912 This is the way method dispatch works. your test message is found in the Lobby, and since the Lobby can get to Object's definition of isActivatable and Lobby Sat, 14 Nov 2009 08:00:01 GMT Mike Austin http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/iolanguage/message/11911 http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/iolanguage/message/11911 I'm a little confused as to why self == Lobby in a new object's activate() slot: Test := Object clone do( init := method( self setIsActivatable(true) ) Wed, 04 Nov 2009 09:27:53 GMT Steve Dekorte http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/iolanguage/message/11910 http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/iolanguage/message/11910 ... I've changed it to use an underline - thanks. Wed, 04 Nov 2009 09:00:52 GMT Steve Dekorte http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/iolanguage/message/11909 http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/iolanguage/message/11909 ... Good point, I've upped it to 12px. Wed, 04 Nov 2009 07:32:59 GMT Justin Poliey http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/iolanguage/message/11908 http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/iolanguage/message/11908 I agree that the type is a little too small, the size on the original page fit much better. I do like the new layout though. The only thing I'm not a huge fan Wed, 04 Nov 2009 07:01:07 GMT Rich Collins http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/iolanguage/message/11907 http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/iolanguage/message/11907 I think you should group some addons into a standard library. People using Io for the first time might be put off that they need to figure out how to Wed, 04 Nov 2009 06:59:24 GMT Rich Collins http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/iolanguage/message/11906 http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/iolanguage/message/11906 Maybe my eyes are starting to fail me, but fonts are a bit small (10px). Wed, 04 Nov 2009 01:08:22 GMT Steve Dekorte http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/iolanguage/message/11905 http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/iolanguage/message/11905 ... I agree that one is needed and like the idea of it integrated with github. For example, you could type: iopackage johnsmith/foobar and it would grab it Wed, 04 Nov 2009 01:01:28 GMT Andreas Schipplock http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/iolanguage/message/11904 http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/iolanguage/message/11904 looks clean, so it's good. I like the mouseover "effect" :). -- Kind regards, Andreas Schipplock. Wed, 04 Nov 2009 00:46:32 GMT Steve Dekorte http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/iolanguage/message/11903 http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/iolanguage/message/11903 The old nav was slot to traverse, so I tried to put all the links on one page: http://iolanguage.com/ feedback welcome Tue, 03 Nov 2009 20:30:53 GMT Justin Poliey http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/iolanguage/message/11902 http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/iolanguage/message/11902 I've outlined the whole problem here: http://github.com/stevedekorte/io/issues#issue/7 Basically, I did a clean pull of Io, a clean pull of Yajl, then made and Tue, 03 Nov 2009 19:02:45 GMT Samuel A. Falvo II http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/iolanguage/message/11901 http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/iolanguage/message/11901 ... You are mistaken; you still need IOPATH to use the symlinked approach too. You can still have a centralized IOPKGS path and a user-specific IOPKGS (or