<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" ?>
<rss xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>javax_compiler at Yahoo! Groups</title>
    <link>http://groups.yahoo.com/group/javax_compiler/</link>
    <description>javax_compiler</description>

    <item>
      <title>J2SE source download under JRL</title>
      <pubDate>Fri, 05 Nov 2004 19:49:14 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>Peter von der Ahé</dc:creator>
      <link>http://groups.yahoo.com/group/javax_compiler/message/103</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://groups.yahoo.com/group/javax_compiler/message/103</guid>
      <description>Hello, I know some of you have been waiting a long time for access to javac sources.  They can be downloaded here: http://java.sun.com/j2se/jrl_download.html </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>jsr199 status</title>
      <pubDate>Tue, 12 Oct 2004 19:08:46 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>Neal Gafter</dc:creator>
      <link>http://groups.yahoo.com/group/javax_compiler/message/102</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://groups.yahoo.com/group/javax_compiler/message/102</guid>
      <description>I have left Sun and now work at Google.  Peter Ahe maintains javac at Sun, and is now the owner of this group.  Peter will probably take on spec leadership for</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: JSR199, How goes it?</title>
      <pubDate>Fri, 26 Sep 2003 16:42:00 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>Neal M Gafter</dc:creator>
      <link>http://groups.yahoo.com/group/javax_compiler/message/101</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://groups.yahoo.com/group/javax_compiler/message/101</guid>
      <description>Huw- The J2SE 1.5 (Tiger) planning folks have further scaled back how much of something like JSR199 they want in Tiger.  Now all that&#39;s going in to Tiger is a </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Welcome to the discussion group for JSR199 (standard API for Ja</title>
      <pubDate>Sun, 17 Aug 2003 22:41:00 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>Neal Gafter</dc:creator>
      <link>http://groups.yahoo.com/group/javax_compiler/message/100</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://groups.yahoo.com/group/javax_compiler/message/100</guid>
      <description>... That is exactly right: the proposed simple tool API is little more than an abstraction of the entry point to the compiler.  The &quot;little more&quot; is that you</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Updated API</title>
      <pubDate>Thu, 14 Aug 2003 21:22:09 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>Neal Gafter</dc:creator>
      <link>http://groups.yahoo.com/group/javax_compiler/message/99</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://groups.yahoo.com/group/javax_compiler/message/99</guid>
      <description>I&#39;ve updated the API to repond to a number of comments.  David Flanagan&#39;s comments were typical of those I am responding to, so I&#39;ve included his comments with</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: JSR 199 comments</title>
      <pubDate>Thu, 14 Aug 2003 21:16:57 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>Neal Gafter</dc:creator>
      <link>http://groups.yahoo.com/group/javax_compiler/message/98</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://groups.yahoo.com/group/javax_compiler/message/98</guid>
      <description>... The mechanism for implementing a command (now tool) should not be specified in the API, as it is up to the vendor of a JDK to implement them however they</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Welcome to the discussion group for JSR199 (standard API for Ja</title>
      <pubDate>Thu, 07 Aug 2003 09:04:27 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>Olivier Lefevre</dc:creator>
      <link>http://groups.yahoo.com/group/javax_compiler/message/97</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://groups.yahoo.com/group/javax_compiler/message/97</guid>
      <description>... That would be nice. If there is no document outlining its design philosophy, that is not very conducive to taking it into account when researching existing</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Welcome to the discussion group for JSR199 (standard API for Ja</title>
      <pubDate>Wed, 06 Aug 2003 08:47:32 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>Philippe P Mulet</dc:creator>
      <link>http://groups.yahoo.com/group/javax_compiler/message/96</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://groups.yahoo.com/group/javax_compiler/message/96</guid>
      <description>I was only mentionning alternate APIs for the long term story when we want to address this JSR. There is no existing documentation reflecting the Eclipse</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Welcome to the discussion group for JSR199 (standard API for Ja</title>
      <pubDate>Fri, 25 Jul 2003 20:47:49 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>Olivier Lefevre</dc:creator>
      <link>http://groups.yahoo.com/group/javax_compiler/message/95</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://groups.yahoo.com/group/javax_compiler/message/95</guid>
      <description>... Oops, sorry. You may have said this earlier and I may have noted it but there is so little traffic on this list that I forgot ;-) ... You misunderstood me.</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Welcome to the discussion group for JSR199 (standard API for Ja</title>
      <pubDate>Fri, 25 Jul 2003 20:28:28 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>Neal M Gafter</dc:creator>
      <link>http://groups.yahoo.com/group/javax_compiler/message/94</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://groups.yahoo.com/group/javax_compiler/message/94</guid>
      <description>Please, folks: when you reply to an email to this list, edit the recipient field.  It defaults to javax_compiler_owner@yahoogroups.com, which means it only</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Welcome to the discussion group for JSR199 (standard API for Ja</title>
      <pubDate>Fri, 25 Jul 2003 13:07:38 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>pmulet2003</dc:creator>
      <link>http://groups.yahoo.com/group/javax_compiler/message/93</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://groups.yahoo.com/group/javax_compiler/message/93</guid>
      <description>The middle road approach suits us. The long term story should however consider existing alternate API, such as the one our Eclipse compiler provides as of</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Simplified API</title>
      <pubDate>Thu, 26 Jun 2003 06:18:58 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>Neal Gafter</dc:creator>
      <link>http://groups.yahoo.com/group/javax_compiler/message/92</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://groups.yahoo.com/group/javax_compiler/message/92</guid>
      <description>... The basic constraints are time and resources.  To be included in Tiger, we have to be substantially done with the spec and reference implementation by </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Using this mailing list</title>
      <pubDate>Wed, 25 Jun 2003 16:17:04 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>Neal Gafter</dc:creator>
      <link>http://groups.yahoo.com/group/javax_compiler/message/91</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://groups.yahoo.com/group/javax_compiler/message/91</guid>
      <description>I&#39;ve been getting some follow-up messages, but all of them in private email.  Please make a point of sending your replies to the mailing list (if you&#39;re a</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Welcome to the discussion group for JSR199 (standard API for Ja</title>
      <pubDate>Tue, 24 Jun 2003 07:20:54 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>Neal M Gafter</dc:creator>
      <link>http://groups.yahoo.com/group/javax_compiler/message/90</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://groups.yahoo.com/group/javax_compiler/message/90</guid>
      <description>... I think this is an excellent idea. ... This too is a good idea.  However, different complers may have completely different command lines, which means a</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Also...</title>
      <pubDate>Tue, 24 Jun 2003 06:54:33 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>Neal Gafter</dc:creator>
      <link>http://groups.yahoo.com/group/javax_compiler/message/89</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://groups.yahoo.com/group/javax_compiler/message/89</guid>
      <description>I&#39;ve also placed the draft simple API in the files section at http://groups.yahoo.com/group/javax_compiler/files/</description>
    </item>

  </channel>
</rss>
<!-- rss1.grp.bf1.yahoo.com uncompressed Sat May 25 15:43:14 PDT 2013 -->
