journalcon at Yahoo! Groups

JournalCon 2003

Ryan Ozawa — Sun, 01 Jun 2003 09:55:19 GMT

Sorry that spam leaked through. It's been a while! This list is now moderated (as most, sadly, clearly need to be). Not that messages have been flooding

Writing Contest!

lepon@... — Sun, 02 Mar 2003 09:20:18 GMT

WRITING CONTEST! Published author and editor Shoshana Lepon wants to hear about the challenges you have faced in life and what you have gained from your

Re: JournalCon 2003

Ryan Kawailani Ozawa — Thu, 09 Jan 2003 07:52:38 GMT

Not a small detail... The Austin bid recommends October 17-19, 2002 as the date for JournalCon. Are there any objections? It doesn't conflict with Canada's

Re: JournalCon 2003

Ryan Kawailani Ozawa — Thu, 09 Jan 2003 07:27:09 GMT

... Yes. Given the feedback to date, an extension was unreasonable, but better planning next time is. Congratulations, Jette, and good luck to you and the

Re: JournalCon 2003

jette@... — Wed, 08 Jan 2003 16:59:26 GMT

... So are you saying that Austin officially has the bid at this point? ... I actually think the Call for Proposals and voting for 2004 should be even

Re: JournalCon 2003

Melissa Posten — Wed, 08 Jan 2003 03:40:40 GMT

Re: JournalCon 2003 - I don't think there are any other bids because the consensus has seemed to be for months that Austin, having lost the last time, would

Re: JournalCon 2003

Amanda Page — Wed, 08 Jan 2003 03:02:52 GMT

I'll chime in with a me too on both issues, Austin for 2003, and calling for bids sooner. A. ... From: "Ryan Kawailani Ozawa" To:

Re: JournalCon 2003

Ryan Kawailani Ozawa — Wed, 08 Jan 2003 01:46:48 GMT

Thanks for all the quick feedback - Jason, Beth, Eileene, Athena... I, personally, agree with Eileen and Beth et. al. to proceed with Austin. And Iko's

Re: JournalCon 2003

Alice — Wed, 08 Jan 2003 01:03:28 GMT

I have to agree Jette and her group spent a lot of time and energy over the holidays to get the bid in on time... Texas should be it! Colleen I'd proceed with

Re: JournalCon 2003

Athena — Wed, 08 Jan 2003 00:58:06 GMT

I agree with Beth. -- Athena ... From: Beth Campbell To: journalcon@yahoogroups.com Sent: Tuesday, January 07, 2003 4:13 PM Subject: Re: [JournalCon]

Re: JournalCon 2003

Eileene Coscolluela — Wed, 08 Jan 2003 00:56:48 GMT

... I'd proceed with Texas. There were clear requirements for bids and if they are the only ones to come up to those requirements, then so be it. Iko PS --

Re: JournalCon 2003

Beth Campbell — Wed, 08 Jan 2003 00:13:49 GMT

I think it's only fair for Austin to get it. They got their bid in on time in spite of the odds. I think if anyone else were really in a position to be

Re: JournalCon 2003

Jason Tamez — Tue, 07 Jan 2003 23:56:00 GMT

... Give em a couple more weeks. I had no idea it was bid time until the Austin bid posted here. (But then, I wasn't really looking.) -- Jason

JournalCon 2003

Ryan Kawailani Ozawa — Tue, 07 Jan 2003 23:43:32 GMT

Aloha mai! As of today, there is only one bid submitted for JournalCon 4. Honestly, I wasn't aware of any others in the works besides an early, early inquiry

Re: Austin bid for 2003

Ryan Kawailani Ozawa — Tue, 07 Jan 2003 02:53:13 GMT

Thanks, Jette, and great work. Your work given the challenges with the time frame of the request for bids and trying to get information out of hotels is