<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" ?>
<rss xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>jslint_com at Yahoo! Groups</title>
    <link>http://groups.yahoo.com/group/jslint_com/</link>
    <description>This group has moved to Google Plus.</description>

    <item>
      <title>Moving to Google Plus</title>
      <pubDate>Fri, 05 Apr 2013 17:22:11 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>douglascrockford</dc:creator>
      <link>http://groups.yahoo.com/group/jslint_com/message/3202</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://groups.yahoo.com/group/jslint_com/message/3202</guid>
      <description>Yahoo Groups has aged really badly, and recently I was locked out of this group a number of times because of Yahoo&#39;s operational problems. So I am moving the</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: option.closure</title>
      <pubDate>Thu, 28 Mar 2013 13:12:26 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>Jos van den Oever</dc:creator>
      <link>http://groups.yahoo.com/group/jslint_com/message/3199</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://groups.yahoo.com/group/jslint_com/message/3199</guid>
      <description>... The parentheses are required to limit the scope of the type cast. The use of @type for casting is not documented on that page, but there is information on</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: option.closure</title>
      <pubDate>Thu, 28 Mar 2013 12:42:54 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>douglascrockford</dc:creator>
      <link>http://groups.yahoo.com/group/jslint_com/message/3198</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://groups.yahoo.com/group/jslint_com/message/3198</guid>
      <description>... Thanks. Please try it now. https://developers.google.com/closure/compiler/docs/js-for-compiler does not indicate that the parens are required. Why are they</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: option.closure</title>
      <pubDate>Thu, 28 Mar 2013 09:34:22 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>Jos van den Oever</dc:creator>
      <link>http://groups.yahoo.com/group/jslint_com/message/3197</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://groups.yahoo.com/group/jslint_com/message/3197</guid>
      <description>... I have tried on jslint.com with this fragment: === /*jslint closure: true, white: true */ function cast(arg) { &quot;use strict&quot;; return</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: get & set</title>
      <pubDate>Wed, 27 Mar 2013 23:54:43 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>rodobrist</dc:creator>
      <link>http://groups.yahoo.com/group/jslint_com/message/3196</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://groups.yahoo.com/group/jslint_com/message/3196</guid>
      <description>... I use get and set sometimes, I am aware that they are: 1. Not overly performant (js perf type diagnostics). 2. Not compatible in IE &lt; 9 browsers. But in</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: get & set</title>
      <pubDate>Wed, 27 Mar 2013 23:47:39 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>Felix E. Klee</dc:creator>
      <link>http://groups.yahoo.com/group/jslint_com/message/3195</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://groups.yahoo.com/group/jslint_com/message/3195</guid>
      <description>On Wed, Mar 27, 2013 at 11:27 PM, douglascrockford ... The idea is that JSLint would warn when it sees something as the following? o.getX = function () {</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>get & set</title>
      <pubDate>Wed, 27 Mar 2013 23:27:37 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>douglascrockford</dc:creator>
      <link>http://groups.yahoo.com/group/jslint_com/message/3194</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://groups.yahoo.com/group/jslint_com/message/3194</guid>
      <description>I have been asked to have JSLint always warn on use of get and set. How would you feel about that?</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>option.closure</title>
      <pubDate>Wed, 27 Mar 2013 21:20:37 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>douglascrockford</dc:creator>
      <link>http://groups.yahoo.com/group/jslint_com/message/3193</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://groups.yahoo.com/group/jslint_com/message/3193</guid>
      <description>I am experimenting with a new option that will tolerate Google Closure declarations. Please let me know if you see problems or omissions.</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: combining Closure Compiler type casting with JSLint</title>
      <pubDate>Wed, 27 Mar 2013 07:18:35 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>Jos van den Oever</dc:creator>
      <link>http://groups.yahoo.com/group/jslint_com/message/3192</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://groups.yahoo.com/group/jslint_com/message/3192</guid>
      <description>... Writing var a = /**@type{!number}*/(b); also has effect on the white-space. JSLint expects the &#39;b&#39; to be much closer to the &#39;=&#39;. This is a check that can</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: combining Closure Compiler type casting with JSLint</title>
      <pubDate>Tue, 26 Mar 2013 22:23:44 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>douglascrockford</dc:creator>
      <link>http://groups.yahoo.com/group/jslint_com/message/3191</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://groups.yahoo.com/group/jslint_com/message/3191</guid>
      <description>... I may add option.closure. Is there any more weirdness?</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>combining Closure Compiler type casting with JSLint</title>
      <pubDate>Tue, 26 Mar 2013 20:33:49 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>Jos van den Oever</dc:creator>
      <link>http://groups.yahoo.com/group/jslint_com/message/3190</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://groups.yahoo.com/group/jslint_com/message/3190</guid>
      <description>In WebODF, we&#39;ve been happily using JSLint for some time. It is a terrific tool for non-trivial JavaScript project. In addition to JSLint we are using Closure</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: JSLint and HTML</title>
      <pubDate>Mon, 25 Mar 2013 18:13:46 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>hemanrobinson</dc:creator>
      <link>http://groups.yahoo.com/group/jslint_com/message/3189</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://groups.yahoo.com/group/jslint_com/message/3189</guid>
      <description>Thanks for all the advice.  We have found a workaround. I am sorry to lose the HTML parsing; it was a useful feature.</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: JSLint and HTML</title>
      <pubDate>Fri, 22 Mar 2013 17:09:39 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>Andrew Todd</dc:creator>
      <link>http://groups.yahoo.com/group/jslint_com/message/3188</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://groups.yahoo.com/group/jslint_com/message/3188</guid>
      <description>... You will be better off moving to a build and templating system that pulls in your JavaScript source files and your HTML templates, checks them separately,</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: JSLint and HTML</title>
      <pubDate>Fri, 22 Mar 2013 06:14:45 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>falk.werner@...</dc:creator>
      <link>http://groups.yahoo.com/group/jslint_com/message/3187</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://groups.yahoo.com/group/jslint_com/message/3187</guid>
      <description>... Is it good practice to only check parts of a product and not the assembled product (&quot;a single output file&quot;) itself?</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: JSLint and HTML</title>
      <pubDate>Thu, 21 Mar 2013 16:47:39 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>Felix E. Klee</dc:creator>
      <link>http://groups.yahoo.com/group/jslint_com/message/3186</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://groups.yahoo.com/group/jslint_com/message/3186</guid>
      <description>On Thu, Mar 21, 2013 at 3:37 PM, hemanrobinson &lt;hemanrobinson@...&gt; ... Good practice is to use separate files during development, and then </description>
    </item>

  </channel>
</rss>
<!-- rss1.grp.bf1.yahoo.com uncompressed Tue Jun 18 21:00:52 PDT 2013 -->
