<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" ?>
<rss xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>jts_discussion at Yahoo! Groups</title>
    <link>http://ca.groups.yahoo.com/group/jts_discussion/</link>
    <description>JTS Topology Suite</description>

    <item>
      <title>Retiring this Email List</title>
      <pubDate>Sat, 31 Jan 2004 21:45:42 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>Paul Ramsey</dc:creator>
      <link>http://ca.groups.yahoo.com/group/jts_discussion/message/620</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://ca.groups.yahoo.com/group/jts_discussion/message/620</guid>
      <description>JTS&#39;ers, As part the new &quot;JUMP Project&quot;, the JTS discussion mailing list is going to be moved to jump-project.org, as a new list: </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>ANN: Open Topology Suite - discussions...</title>
      <pubDate>Thu, 29 Jan 2004 10:05:58 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>Paul Selormey</dc:creator>
      <link>http://ca.groups.yahoo.com/group/jts_discussion/message/619</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://ca.groups.yahoo.com/group/jts_discussion/message/619</guid>
      <description>Hello All, To anyone interested in the .NET version of the JTS 1.4 (Open Topology Suite) I have created a mailing list at </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Holes in Polygons</title>
      <pubDate>Tue, 27 Jan 2004 21:31:23 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>Jonathan Aquino</dc:creator>
      <link>http://ca.groups.yahoo.com/group/jts_discussion/message/618</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://ca.groups.yahoo.com/group/jts_discussion/message/618</guid>
      <description>How about something brute force like: for each polygon i in polygons for each polygon j in polygons if i.contains(j) { polygonsContainingOtherPolygons.add(i) }</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Holes in Polygons</title>
      <pubDate>Tue, 27 Jan 2004 18:50:05 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>Martin Davis</dc:creator>
      <link>http://ca.groups.yahoo.com/group/jts_discussion/message/617</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://ca.groups.yahoo.com/group/jts_discussion/message/617</guid>
      <description>You could use the Polygonizer class - it will assign holes to polygons. Martin Davis, Senior Technical Architect Vivid Solutions Inc. Suite #1A-2328 Government</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Holes in Polygons</title>
      <pubDate>Tue, 27 Jan 2004 17:11:15 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>guillen20042003</dc:creator>
      <link>http://ca.groups.yahoo.com/group/jts_discussion/message/616</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://ca.groups.yahoo.com/group/jts_discussion/message/616</guid>
      <description>Hi, I use JTS for some days, it&#39;s very efficient. But I have a pb: I have using JTS build from a set of linestring a set of polygons. I want know the polgygons</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Open Topology Suite</title>
      <pubDate>Tue, 27 Jan 2004 03:29:19 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>Paul Selormey</dc:creator>
      <link>http://ca.groups.yahoo.com/group/jts_discussion/message/615</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://ca.groups.yahoo.com/group/jts_discussion/message/615</guid>
      <description>Hello David, I will say it is a nice theory, but as you rightly said &quot;in practice...&quot; A Java programmer will love his/her pure Java stuff so is the .NET </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Open Topology Suite</title>
      <pubDate>Tue, 27 Jan 2004 00:54:29 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>David Blasby</dc:creator>
      <link>http://ca.groups.yahoo.com/group/jts_discussion/message/614</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://ca.groups.yahoo.com/group/jts_discussion/message/614</guid>
      <description>There&#39;s been some discussion on porting JTS to other languages. I&#39;d like to throw out the idea that this isnt really necessary - you should be able to write a</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Open Topology Suite</title>
      <pubDate>Tue, 27 Jan 2004 00:48:34 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>Paul Selormey</dc:creator>
      <link>http://ca.groups.yahoo.com/group/jts_discussion/message/613</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://ca.groups.yahoo.com/group/jts_discussion/message/613</guid>
      <description>Hello Jon, Thanks for the response - you really like HTML mails :-) ... Actually, I need it not just the fun of porting to .NET, so yes I am happy I got the</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Open Topology Suite</title>
      <pubDate>Tue, 27 Jan 2004 00:44:22 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>Paul Selormey</dc:creator>
      <link>http://ca.groups.yahoo.com/group/jts_discussion/message/612</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://ca.groups.yahoo.com/group/jts_discussion/message/612</guid>
      <description>Hello Andrew, Thanks for the interest. ... minor ... seemed to work. ... be installed ... To be frank, I have never like the VJ&#43;+6.0 and its update J#, it is</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Open Topology Suite</title>
      <pubDate>Mon, 26 Jan 2004 18:39:47 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>Jonathan Aquino</dc:creator>
      <link>http://ca.groups.yahoo.com/group/jts_discussion/message/611</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://ca.groups.yahoo.com/group/jts_discussion/message/611</guid>
      <description>Hi Paul -- Sounds like you&#39;re proud of your achievement! Regarding your question of why WKTReader uses StreamTokenizer rather than StringTokenizer: the only</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Finding the direction of the begining of a new segment</title>
      <pubDate>Mon, 26 Jan 2004 18:32:53 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>Jonathan Aquino</dc:creator>
      <link>http://ca.groups.yahoo.com/group/jts_discussion/message/610</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://ca.groups.yahoo.com/group/jts_discussion/message/610</guid>
      <description>Check out the functions in the Angle class, specifically #getTurn and #angle. -- Jon Aquino  Programmer/Analyst  250-385-6040  www.vividsolutions.com ... From:</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Finding the direction of the begining of a new segment</title>
      <pubDate>Mon, 26 Jan 2004 15:04:05 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>Aurélio Calegari</dc:creator>
      <link>http://ca.groups.yahoo.com/group/jts_discussion/message/609</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://ca.groups.yahoo.com/group/jts_discussion/message/609</guid>
      <description>Hello, Well, I&#39;m new to JTS, and I&#39;m developing a tool to calculate path of a given city. I&#39;m using the GeoTools Toolkit, geoServer, opsResearch API, etc. For</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Open Topology Suite</title>
      <pubDate>Mon, 26 Jan 2004 12:48:29 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>Coats, Andy W</dc:creator>
      <link>http://ca.groups.yahoo.com/group/jts_discussion/message/608</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://ca.groups.yahoo.com/group/jts_discussion/message/608</guid>
      <description>Another member of our team used J# to compile JTS. There were about 8 minor compilation errors to be fixed. We&#39;ve not run the tests, but everything seemed to</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Open Topology Suite</title>
      <pubDate>Mon, 26 Jan 2004 11:21:20 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>Paul Selormey</dc:creator>
      <link>http://ca.groups.yahoo.com/group/jts_discussion/message/607</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://ca.groups.yahoo.com/group/jts_discussion/message/607</guid>
      <description>MessageHello All, I have &quot;successfully&quot; ported the JTS to .NET, based on the JTS 1.4. All my initial tests were successful; buffer, intersection etc. I started</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Unrelated questions</title>
      <pubDate>Fri, 23 Jan 2004 19:13:19 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>Jonathan Aquino</dc:creator>
      <link>http://ca.groups.yahoo.com/group/jts_discussion/message/606</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://ca.groups.yahoo.com/group/jts_discussion/message/606</guid>
      <description>Yes ProGuard is great for finding dead code and PMD for warning about suspicious code. Eclipse is another good tool for generating warnings about suspicious</description>
    </item>

  </channel>
</rss>
<!-- wr2.grp.sp2.yahoo.com uncompressed/chunked Thu Dec 31 10:12:11 PST 2009 -->
