kanbandev at Yahoo! Groups

Re: Kanban vs. DBR (was Kanban and Retrospectives)

Jef Newsom — Sat, 30 Aug 2008 15:41:36 GMT

Agreed - I thoroughly enjoyed the insight. Jef Newsom | 214.728.0650 | Improving - It's what we do. Rural Sourcing | Learning Solutions | Certified Consulting

Re: Kanban vs. DBR (was Kanban and Retrospectives)

Matt — Sat, 30 Aug 2008 15:36:34 GMT

David, Might be more than Brad was bargaining for but was exactly what I was hoping for... thanks for the taking the time :) Matt ... kanban. ... DBR.

Re: Kanban and Retrospectives

Matt — Sat, 30 Aug 2008 15:33:50 GMT

Jef, ... prioritize, it requests the next prioritized item. Your customer uses some reasonable process to pick that next one, and *that* is prioritization. The

Re: Kanban vs. DBR (was Kanban and Retrospectives)

David J Anderson — Sat, 30 Aug 2008 03:47:05 GMT

The buffer is there to protect the constraint from becoming idle. It's actually the rope that is the equivalent of the kanban tokens. However, in DBR only the

Re: Kanban and Timeboxes (was Kanban and Restrospectives)

Brad Appleton — Sat, 30 Aug 2008 03:14:35 GMT

... Actually - I dont think timeboxes went away. It looks like they simply moved from the "development" side of thing over to the "release" side when the two

Re: Kanban vs. DBR (was Kanban and Retrospectives)

Brad Appleton — Sat, 30 Aug 2008 03:06:14 GMT

... Argghh - I think you explained this once before but I'm having trouble finding it. Remind me again what the difference is between the WIP-limit, and a

Re: Kanban down under

Andrei Nadin — Sat, 30 Aug 2008 02:17:14 GMT

Yup, I am doing it in Melbourne 2008/8/28 David J Anderson

Re: Kanban and Retrospectives

Jef Newsom — Fri, 29 Aug 2008 22:14:15 GMT

Sorry - it may be semantics, but what you described doesn't prioritize, it requests the next prioritized item. Your customer uses some reasonable process to

Re: Kanban with different-sized features?

Rob Park — Fri, 29 Aug 2008 21:19:37 GMT

On Fri, Aug 29, 2008 at 12:47 PM, rob_hathaway74 < ... If a user story is really going to take 3 weeks then breaking it down only diverts the teams focus away

Re: Kanban with different-sized features?

David J Anderson — Fri, 29 Aug 2008 21:15:35 GMT

This is cool! Thanks for sharing! What I feel is key is a focus on reducing variation - and on reducing granularity - they tend to go hand in hand. The net

Re: Kanban and Retrospectives

David J Anderson — Fri, 29 Aug 2008 21:09:48 GMT

As we discussed earlier in the thread, it makes sense to have a separate kaizen kanban rather than mix it with the product backlog. I'm sorry I don't agree

Re: Kanban with different-sized features?

Rob Park — Fri, 29 Aug 2008 21:04:42 GMT

Go Matt! Very nice! .rob.

Re: Kanban with different-sized features?

Rob Park — Fri, 29 Aug 2008 21:00:42 GMT

I've understood this to be the preferred method on most groups. Post the url + plus a synopsis. If the synopsis is intriguing, go to the url, but don't clog

Re: Kanban and Retrospectives

Jef Newsom — Fri, 29 Aug 2008 20:19:35 GMT

itchy trigger finger... If that is the process, then do you push the items from kaizen events unto the unprioritized backlog to feed the kanban and allow them

Re: Kanban and Retrospectives

Jef Newsom — Fri, 29 Aug 2008 20:00:57 GMT

OK. No offense, but that isn't actually a prioritization process, is it? That is everything up to the prioritization process, or else everything up to the