korgpolyex at Yahoo! Groups

Re: AtomaHawk FM-800 - major improvement

Michael Hawkins — Wed, 06 Jan 2010 02:18:48 GMT

HAHA! For those of you who already have an AtomaHawk and HAWK-800, the upgrade cost is ZERO. And I will take any currency! The moog slayer under

Re: S&H random modulation generation.

gordonjcp — Tue, 05 Jan 2010 21:23:33 GMT

... "Pseudo-random". The Moog MG-1 used a single-chip pseudo-random noise generator, the MM5837. Since its output *does* repeat, then sampling at a low rate

Re: S&H random modulation generation.

Atom Smasher — Tue, 05 Jan 2010 20:26:39 GMT

... ================= i'm not familiar with that synth in particular, but having a fast wave sampled by a slow wave is a "random" LFO design that i recall from

Re: AtomaHawk FM-800 - major improvement

Atom Smasher — Tue, 05 Jan 2010 20:13:46 GMT

... =============== reminds me of the fact that most "log taper" pots are actually two linear regions forming a "bent knee" shape. will this optimization also

S&H random modulation generation.

Russ — Tue, 05 Jan 2010 18:24:19 GMT

"A high frequency sine wave sampled at low frequency will resemble a random number generator. An infinitely high frequency sine wave sampled at infinitely low

AtomaHawk FM-800 - major improvement

korgpolyex800 — Tue, 05 Jan 2010 16:58:53 GMT

A new software release for the HAWK-800/AtomaHawk will be coming out within a week or so. It includes a very important improvement to the AtomaHawk FM-800 mod

Random sample and hold - control parameters - TO DO LIST

korgpolyex800 — Tue, 05 Jan 2010 16:23:46 GMT

I would love to hear this too... I've added it into the HAWK-800 "to do list". And just so as you know how much I appreciate this list too, I want to send out

Re: Random sample and hold - please explain

Electrohead — Tue, 05 Jan 2010 15:21:37 GMT

Wow! Looping a set of S&H results.. That's another really great idea!!! I'd love to hear that!! I'm on Yahoo groups for every vintage/classic synth I own and

Re: Random sample and hold - please explain

Alex Drinkwater — Mon, 04 Jan 2010 23:32:01 GMT

That's a really good point. I have an original (G1) Nord Modular, and one of the coolest features is a bank of 128 x128 'random' patterns. In fact, they're not

Re: Random sample and hold - please explain

gordonjcp — Mon, 04 Jan 2010 23:20:22 GMT

... It also leads to the possibility that you could have a start and a loop parameter to restrict the range within the lookup table that the "random" S&H uses.

Re: Random sample and hold - please explain

Atom Smasher — Mon, 04 Jan 2010 22:01:12 GMT

a seemingly simple problem that isn't simple at all... http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pseudorandom_number_generator there's random, and then there's *RANDOM*.

Re: Random sample and hold - please explain

gordonjcp — Mon, 04 Jan 2010 18:39:22 GMT

... Although this approach is used for the hihat/cymbal generator in a lot of analogue drum machines - look at the circuit for the TR606 for example. A single

Re: Joystick knob replacement - who wants one?

Michael Hawkins — Mon, 04 Jan 2010 18:37:01 GMT

Paul, I have Poly-800,DW-6000,DW-8000 joystick knobs available. hawk800.com Enjoy! Mike. ________________________________ From: PC To:

Re: Random sample and hold - please explain

Michael Hawkins — Mon, 04 Jan 2010 18:23:36 GMT

Yes, you're quite right. I was wrong. Back to school for me. Mike ________________________________ From: ASSI To:

Re: Random sample and hold - please explain

ASSI — Mon, 04 Jan 2010 18:07:33 GMT

... No. It would resemble DC. :-) If you're curious why this happens, the "natural" reconstructed signal in this case lies between DC and the sampling