http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/landscape-appreciation/ Landscape Appreciation Wed, 04 Nov 2009 16:47:44 GMT Jorge http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/landscape-appreciation/message/237 http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/landscape-appreciation/message/237 Regarding the second question posed by landscaperian in his Post 229: "b) Which of the various ways of categorization that have been proposed is the most Wed, 21 Oct 2009 20:38:20 GMT Jorge http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/landscape-appreciation/message/236 http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/landscape-appreciation/message/236 I have added a new webpage to the Landscape Genres website: The Classical Landscape. It contains the original text of Norberg-Schulz on this topic, illustrated Sun, 11 Oct 2009 19:11:35 GMT Jorge http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/landscape-appreciation/message/235 http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/landscape-appreciation/message/235 In her Post #232 E. Fernandez points our attention to cultural factors; these are quite relevant to our current subject of landscape typologies and deserve, I Tue, 06 Oct 2009 17:45:59 GMT tittivulus http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/landscape-appreciation/message/234 http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/landscape-appreciation/message/234 The lattest Posts trying to reply the questions of Landscaperian made me remember what a philosopher of name I don't remember said about questions and answers: Tue, 29 Sep 2009 19:05:22 GMT eddington http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/landscape-appreciation/message/233 http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/landscape-appreciation/message/233 Continuing from my Post # 230 , regarding the importance of classification in appreciating landscapes? Ellen Fernandez writes in her Post # 232: " This Fri, 25 Sep 2009 15:07:45 GMT Ellen Fernandez-Sacco, Ph.D. http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/landscape-appreciation/message/232 http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/landscape-appreciation/message/232 A question for you.. Is the 'freezing' of landscape whether in photography, painting or memory simply a question of style? And as far as beer and brandy go, it Fri, 25 Sep 2009 15:02:49 GMT eddington http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/landscape-appreciation/message/231 http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/landscape-appreciation/message/231 Only recently I discovered that Group Members can post images and even create albums in the Photos section of our Yahoo Landscape Appreciation site. Cool! as Thu, 24 Sep 2009 21:27:18 GMT eddington http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/landscape-appreciation/message/230 http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/landscape-appreciation/message/230 Re. the first question posed by Landscaperian in Post # 229: " a) Is categorization useful for the appreciation of landscapes?" I would say that not only it is Mon, 21 Sep 2009 20:55:20 GMT landscaperian http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/landscape-appreciation/message/229 http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/landscape-appreciation/message/229 In his last Post (Sp.,16) Jorgeg proposes that "we continue our exchange of views on landscape types according to C. Norberg-Schulz.". I am all for it; but Wed, 16 Sep 2009 15:45:30 GMT jorgeg34 http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/landscape-appreciation/message/228 http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/landscape-appreciation/message/228 Greetings to all members! After a prolonged summer recess I propose we continue our exchange of views on landscape types according to C. Norberg-Schulz. I have Mon, 11 May 2009 12:39:19 GMT jorgeg34 http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/landscape-appreciation/message/227 http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/landscape-appreciation/message/227 In Post #224, concerning Norberg-Schulz category of complex landscapes I wrote: "On this point I am afraid I part ways with the Norberg-Schulz scheme. If most Tue, 21 Apr 2009 18:42:14 GMT jorgeg34 http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/landscape-appreciation/message/226 http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/landscape-appreciation/message/226 In his Post #225, Eddington7 wrote: I am sort of puzzled about how it came to be that the four types became 'styles' when N-S ideas were quoted or interpreted Sun, 29 Mar 2009 17:51:42 GMT eddington7 http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/landscape-appreciation/message/225 http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/landscape-appreciation/message/225 Now that we've covered all four of the Norberg-Schulz types of landscapes perhaps it is the opportunity of clarifying what sort of 'types' they are supposed to Sun, 22 Mar 2009 21:32:52 GMT jorgeg34 http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/landscape-appreciation/message/224 http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/landscape-appreciation/message/224 Having reviewed the romantic, classical and cosmic landscape according to the ideas proposed by Norberg-Schulz, it is time now to present his last type: the Sun, 08 Mar 2009 20:38:14 GMT jorgeg34 http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/landscape-appreciation/message/223 http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/landscape-appreciation/message/223 Tim: Perhaps the following quote will make for an added argument. Our much quoted Norberg-Schulz eloquently writes in his book Nightlands (pp.15): " ?But